Audrey @cheekyrascal19 - Twitter Profile

@EricMahon4 @walesfam2025 Work full time but can still manage to take time off to spend with my children during their school holidays. I’ll really enjoy my time off now knowing poor you is out working 😊

1

0

16

Audrey @cheekyrascal19

5 months ago

@TwoBrf @RE_DailyMail Charles wasn’t King during the time in question, and why would William have known anything?

0

2

0

29

cheekyrascal19 retweeted

Rangers Football Club @RangersFC

5 months ago

👊 HIS FIRST RANGERS GOAL

53

4K

230

7

122K

cheekyrascal19 retweeted

Queen Esther

@XOQueenEsther

6 months ago

So let me get this straight. Prince Harry walked away from duty, responsibility, and service. He trashed the institution. Monetised his grievances. Accused his family, his country, and his people of cruelty and abuse. Moved to California to cosplay as a persecuted celebrity. And now, after all that, the UK taxpayer is expected to automatically fund armed police protection for his visits. Not because he serves the country. Not because he represents the Crown. But because he made himself a global target by running his mouth for money. This is not “fairness.” This is rewarding recklessness. Security risk is not something that magically appears. It is created. By interviews. By books. By Netflix tantrums. By deliberately inflaming hatred while cashing the cheque. You do not get to light the fire and then demand the public pay for the fire brigade. And let’s address the emotional blackmail being wheeled out right on cue. “Family visits.” “Children’s safety.” “Grandfather.” Interesting how the kids only become relevant when taxpayer-funded perks are on the table. Meghan Markle chose to leave. They both chose to leave. They chose distance. They chose exposure. They chose profit over privacy. The UK did not exile them. They flounced. Calling this a “formality” is insulting. Calling it compassion is dishonest. Calling it necessary is absurd. Millions of people face threats without armed police escorts. Public servants who actually work for the country do not get this level of protection. But a California resident who despises Britain apparently does. If he wants state protection, he can return to state duty. If he wants a private life, he can pay for private security. What he does not get is all the benefits with none of the responsibility. This is not about safety. It is about entitlement. And the British public should be furious.