@alojohhardcore Loaded all the way to $998 today while heavy on margin… I wouldn't have had the guts or conviction to push like this before earning without AJ🙌🔥 Thank you so much!
@Yuri_Baranov@KennethWKnapp1@AhmedHegazy@alojohhardcore I can confirm that during the yen carry trade, Fidelity, Robinhood and Schwab were down for me. To Schwab’s credit, their Thinkorswim desktop app was up at the time.
@alojohhardcore Really enjoyed reading this report right at the inflection point! Is adding AMAT to the cockpit next? Eager to see how it ranks. Also, does a recent 45-60 day median multiple anchor make sense here, given the repricing likely happened around Q1 earnings (~30 days ago)?
Thanks for the breakdown. Building on your point about small-cap stocks—do you think exposing signals could make the group a target for predatory attacks? For instance, if you signal a smaller ticket like XPEV, could it attract extensive shorting from people trying to fade the group's momentum? Would love to get your thoughts on this risk.
This timeline aligns with Ken Griffin’s perspective. He recently laid out a compelling case for high oil prices: while the U.S. is relatively shielded, energy scarcity spreading across the developing world for 6 to 12 months would create the perfect conditions for a global recession. We’re likely looking at these prices being fully priced in by August.
That said, August may already be late for the Trump administration to effectively bring down costs before the midterm campaign hits its peak. Because of that political pressure, we might actually see a push to drive prices down well before August.
https://t.co/CioAp0lw4U
For anyone tracking $PLTR’s multiple compression, the PLTR deep dive (at 33:42) breaks it down: https://t.co/pDYFX1iUnH
TLDR:
1. Using the PEG ratio, Palantir is actually fairly valued.
2. The high multiple is in a "league of its own" due to massive growth acceleration.
3. Even with a flat stock price, the P/E naturally resets to the ~40x range in a year as EPS catches up.
So an upside is still possible.
If the multiple compresses to the 40x–45x range over the next year, does that imply the price stays stagnant or even corrects—unless we see massive EPS growth to offset that reset? Also, given your concern on crude, is a full exit a possible play if $100 oil starts to truly price in?
@alojohhardcore Front-running can set up a classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” reversal — thanks for flagging it. Looking at loading some UVXY as a hedge going into this week.
@alojohhardcore In this "crazy scenario": AMD’s median forward P/E (20.5x) is nearly identical to NVDA’s. AMD likely has fully priced in Su's guidance.
In 2024, AMD peaked at 60x vs NVDA’s 40x, showing AMD's much higher valuation volatility.
Trump's Truth Social claim: Iran is totally defeated, on its knees, practically apologizing.
Reality check
Significant damage to Iranian ballistic missile forces → true
But: Iran just destroyed a $300M US radar with a $30K drone. Some sources say the total damage to multiple radar sites is > 4 Billion $.
Iran hit US bases in 7 countries last week → While the US Navy is unable (at least not yet) to keep the Hormuz straits open. Oil at $90.
Iranian president: “We will never surrender”
No signs of collapse; likely to continue if China/Russia continues to back them with intelligence.
True—it's ultimately about whether enough crews and operators are willing to take the risk, even for significantly higher pay. Life-or-death stakes don't vanish just because insurance becomes available, so this will take time.
This mirrors Operation Earnest Will in the 1980s: once U.S. escorts stabilized perceptions, traffic resumed despite ongoing threats. Crew willingness often follows when financial exposure drops and naval protection is visible.
Variables to observe: How quickly/cheaply the DFC coverage rolls out;
How many lines actually sign up;
Whether Iran escalates asymmetric attacks (drones, small boats, mines);
I hope tanker flows restart within days, but it is probably more likely to be weeks.