JUST IN: Scientists say AI has decoded communication patterns in mice, dolphins, apes, birds, whales, & cuttlefish — could eventually lead to humans communicating directly with animals.
🚨 THERE IS VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AI BUBBLE AND THE DOT-COM BUBBLE.
Microsoft invested $13 BILLION into OpenAI, OpenAI then spent that money back on Microsoft Azure servers, and Microsoft booked it as cloud revenue.
Amazon and Google are running similar loops with Anthropic while reporting massive paper gains from rising AI valuations.
OpenAI reportedly burns over $60 BILLION annually on compute while generating only $25 BILLION in revenue.
This is dangerously similar to the 2000 Dot-Com bubble, when telecom companies inflated revenues by selling assets and network capacity to each other before the entire system collapsed.
@cryptorover@VladTheInflator ✨🔥✨ after the Dot-Com bubble many companies made it through and the next generation of innovation was established. I believe we are at the dawn 🌅 of Agentic AI now and the world will never be the same .✨🐎🌅 @cheray@starhorseai
Paris-based startup SquareMind recently raised $18M to launch Swan, the world’s first robot designed to capture standardized, full-body dermoscopic skin imaging.
The funding round was led by Sonder Capital, founded by Fred Moll, the “father of surgical robotics” who built Intuitive Surgical’s da Vinci system in the 1990s.
Swan uses a robotic arm to scan a patient’s entire skin surface in minutes, paired with AI software that tracks new or changing moles across visits.
The tech addresses a critical bottleneck in dermatology, where months-long waitlists collide with the fact that 80% of melanomas are new lesions.
Commercial launch in the US and Europe is expected later this year.
Good Wednesday Morning, Beautiful Friends ☕️🌻🩵
We never know what’s around the next corner. 🤷🏼♀️
It’s best not to have specific expections. 😌
I’ll accept and be grateful for my blessings. 🙏
Kindness is always in style. ♥️
Have a great and wonderful day. 😊
🌥️🙋🏼♀️☕️🌻🩵🥰
It’s all about the data and this is a red flag 🚩 to question the real estate inspector about what software they are using. ; the issue is the buyers inspector will do their own inspections and these inspectors can’t be chosen by the seller . Maybe there can be a clause in the sellers contract that to retain privacy that the software used by the inspector should be disclosed.✨🔥✨ Cheray
Many have reached out to me regarding the new Cyber EO. A few thoughts:
First, President Trump is the most pro-innovation president we’ve ever had. He’s made it clear that the U.S. has to win the AI race and that a pro-innovation, pro-energy, and pro-infrastructure policy is the way to do that. Thanks to President Trump, AI will generate over a 2% tailwind to GDP growth this year, with hundreds of thousands of new construction jobs and 25-30% wage increases for blue collar workers. President Trump is the reason that we have an AI boom happening right now.
The change in the EO from a 90 day to 30 day period is a game changer because it allows our AI labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying new model releases. They can synchronize their efforts under the EO with other pre-release activities. Furthermore, I’ve been advised by the lawyers who draft EOs that 30 days means calendar days, not business days. In the AI race, every day counts.
As OSTP well notes, “The EO creates a process for frontier labs to voluntarily share cutting-edge cyber models in order to secure critical infrastructure and strengthen the government’s own cyber defenses. We are NOT conducting oversight of all new models, as that level of government overreach would have chilling effects on free speech and innovation.”
OSTP’s characterization is completely consistent with the discussions that I have participated in, where it was agreed that the EO is intended to apply only to models that represent a meaningful step-change in cyber capabilities (eg Mythos), not to incremental version numbers of existing models (eg Opus 4.7 -> 4.8).
Finally, I understand the concerns of many that this could morph into an “FDA for AI”. Of course bureaucratic mission creep is always a danger and this should be closely monitored. But the EO expressly forbids the creation of a new licensing, preclearance, or permitting regime. Most importantly, I do not believe that President Trump would allow this to happen.
As AI presents new policy challenges (such as cyberweapons), I believe that everyone in the administration is working diligently to navigate the issues with the American people in mind. I look forward to working with the Treasury, NSA, ONCD and others on the implementation of this framework.
BREAKING: The AI revolution will be 50 times bigger than the Dotcom revolution in the 2000s, SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son told CNBC Monday.
“I think this is like more than 10x, probably 50x bigger than dotcom,” Son told CNBC’s Arjun Kharpal in Paris a day after the company announced that it’s investing 75 billion euros ($87 billion) to build AI infrastructure in France, including 5 GW of AI data center capacity.
More details: https://t.co/BpyAOFdoKM