It's quite a slippery slope to accept a government's control over speech, even the speech emitted by a machine, because how different really is the text you read from a book, or the text you read from an AI model?
Today for the first time I'm aware of, a government made an AI company turn of it's model to the general public. This is interesting, because all the model does is generate "speech." You could say it emits knowledge. Humans also emit knowledge, and speech. Would it make sense then for the government to shut up humans that could have said or transmitted the same information the AI model could do? That would be an obvious violation of several rights guaranteed under the constitution.
The most slippery of slopes.
re: "Anthropic"
Anthropic just dropped Fable 5, and our PLUSX dev team is already testing it.
At PlusX, with every major model release we do a security test of all our protocols.
We don't wait. We test right away.
AI Security is at the foundation of everything we build.
Since its launch, LPX has quietly burned over 16 billion PLSX.
LPX continues to become the platform of choice for earning yield on all your RH cores and any PRC-20 token.
In last 30 days, over $500,000 of value was deposited in LPX yield generating pools.
Real utility. Burning PLSX continuously.