A Swedish court has ruled that the Eritrean migrant who raped 16-year-old Meya Åberg won’t be deported because the rape didn’t last long enough.
The rape took place on September 1st last year when Meya missed her bus and was walking through a pedestrian tunnel after finishing her shift at McDonald’s.
Meya and her family immediately reported it to the police.
The 18-year-old Eritrean migrant, named Yazied Mohamed, was sentenced to 3 years in prison for rape.
Mohamed is a citizen of Eritrea, and the prosecutor sought his deportation.
However, the Court of Appeal noted that the man has refugee status. Under Swedish law, deporting a refugee requires that the crime committed constitutes an “exceptionally serious offense” and that allowing them to remain in Sweden would pose a “serious threat to public order and safety.”
The rape of 16-year-old Meya was not deemed serious enough to justify deportation, with the Court of Appeal citing, among other factors, the “duration” of the rape in its assessment.
“Rape is, in many cases, considered an exceptionally serious offense that could lead to the deportation of a refugee, but an assessment must be made based on all circumstances in the individual case. Given the nature and duration of the offense in question, the Court of Appeal finds that while the crime is serious, it does not constitute an exceptionally serious offense that would warrant a deportation order for Yazied Mohamed. The request for deportation is therefore rejected,” the Court of Appeal for Upper Norrland wrote in its ruling.
Max about lap record he set today
"I mean, its also the new asphalt, different curbs, the track has also just gotten quicker. I think if you put the 2020 Mercedes here, you'll go quicker."
"Especially if you put me in that car. Then we go even faster."
bro @aadit_palicha why am i seeing 100 ads on zepto instead of the order tracking screen? i just want to know where the delivery partner is so i can perfectly time when i need to get up from the couch and walk to my door!
@Amitgho74952376 Surviving doesn’t mean thriving. Just because they aren’t ‘starving’ doesn’t justify unpaid labour or dismiss the need for recognition and compensation. Economic survival through dependence isn’t empowerment.
One of them is doing a job, has paid leaves, insurance, respect from her peers. The other is doing unpaid labour?? The picture also implies being a flight attendant is somehow bad? A flight attendant is educated and earns a shit ton of money! Why are men so dense in the head?
i had a guy in my dm’s saying “indian laws favour women” and when i said men roam around freely after raping women he said “there’s a lot of politics involved in ‘all that’ actually” he isn’t wrong because the court condones it now :))
according to miss ma’am here, women can’t carry a suitcase, drive, or use google maps. women can do allll that but majority of the men will not be able to do household chores without asking 100 questions to the women in their life.