🚨The UK just secretly flew 24,000 Afghans into the country and made it illegal for the press to even cover the story. Now, it turns out all of them get free housing and welfare for "the rest of their lives" without ever having to work.
Doomed country.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.
This cxnt thinks he’s going to slip away into obscurity with millions in the bank and a fat pension!
Don’t forget what this evil vindictive dictator did !
So this cunt Andy Burnham welcomes illegal migrants while trying to start a war with Russia. Apparently, this is what keeping Britain safe looks like. What a fucking clown😂🇬🇧
27th August 1816 - The Bombardment of Algiers.
A British fleet under Admiral Lord Exmouth, supported by a smaller Dutch squadron, bombarded Algiers after demands to release enslaved Christians were refused. After hours of fierce fighting, the Dey capitulated, more than 1,000 Christian slaves were freed, and Algiers agreed to end the enslavement of white Europeans, a major British-led blow against the Barbary slave trade. 🏴
So labour can't find £4.5 bn for defence but they can find £13 bn for foreign aid. I fucking despair! There's literally a war in Europe with Putin threatening Britain and labour blow the money on foreign aid. They're mentally ill.
Metropolitan Police Officer Charged With Three Counts of Rape.
Mohammad Adil Waheed, 23, a serving Metropolitan Police officer currently suspended from duty, has been charged with three counts of rape following an investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary’s Sexual Offences Investigation Team.
The charges relate to alleged off-duty offences involving a woman in July 2025. He is due to appear at St Albans Magistrates Court on Thursday, 27 August 2026.
#UKNews #CrimeNews #Hertfordshire
We didn’t end up here by accident. We reasoned our way into this madness.
When police ignore a dying teenager to investigate an allegation of hurt feelings, it isn't an operational failure, it's the exact policy the establishment spent years demanding.
They spent a decade arguing for differential treatment. Now that the absurdity of that logic is exposed, they’re gaslighting us into believing we’re not seeing what we’re seeing.
David Lammy launched the biggest assault on English liberty — particularly free speech — in more than 800 years.
Rather than do the hard yards of governing and get the courts sitting, he made the political choice to curb one of our most precious rights.
Now that Andy Burnham has sacked Lammy, we need to know what he is going to do. Is he keeping Lammy’s reforms or axing them?
FSU research has shown that those charged with speech-related offences are almost twice as likely to be acquitted in a Crown Court with a jury than in a magistrates’ court without one.
Put simply, if Lammy’s reforms go through, more people will be banged up simply for exercising their right to free speech.
The FSU has been on the frontline of the campaign to defend our right to trial by jury. Our petition calling on the Government to guarantee that right has reached more than 50,000 signatures.
When Parliament returns from recess in September, Andy Burnham must drop this authoritarian plan to slash our right to jury trials.
Watch FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson 👇
Exactly 6 years ago, Kyle Rittenhouse shot 3 activists at a BLM riot in self-defense
- 1 was a convicted pedophile
- 1 was a convicted felon (burglary)
- 1 was a convicted domestic abuser
The Government must come clean over whether extremist groups were able to influence its Islamophobia definition — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
A Freedom of Information (FOI) request from Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy has revealed that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government deleted all responses submitted to the consultation carried out by the Working Group tasked with drafting the definition.
As Melanie Phillips writes in The Times: “When a government department starts shredding the evidence behind its decisions, it’s a fair bet that it has something to hide from the public.”
The whole process has been shrouded in secrecy. The Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group had previously been sympathetic to the need for a definition and had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments have maintained a policy of non-engagement with.
The Working Group ditched the term “Islamophobia”, following criticism from groups including the FSU, which warned that such a definition would have a chilling effect on free speech. Accusations of Islamophobia have long been used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam, and this definition risks exacerbating that problem.
Nick Timothy himself was branded an Islamophobe, reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and even faced calls to resign after criticising a public Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square.
The Communities Department has denied that extremist groups were involved in the process and says consultation responses were deleted in line with data-protection requirements.
But that does not explain why the Government cannot disclose which organisations contributed to the consultation.
The Muslim Council of Britain and MEND have long campaigned for an Islamophobia definition. The public deserves to know whether they — or other similar organisations — were given an opportunity to influence it.
There are already laws protecting people from religious hatred and discrimination. There is no need for this definition.
If the Government is serious about tackling genuine anti-Muslim hatred, it should enforce the laws already on the statute book — not introduce what risks becoming a de facto Islamic blasphemy law.
Yet the Government is actively encouraging public bodies, private organisations and charities to adopt the definition.
The FSU has already successfully challenged South Wales Police after it attempted to implement an even more zealous version, under which officers were instructed to record comments that went beyond “legitimate” discussion of Islam.
Just 45 minutes after the then Communities Secretary, Steve Reed, unveiled the definition in the House of Commons, pro-Gaza MP Iqbal Mohamed asked whether it could be incorporated into the Nolan Principles of Public Life.
Had that happened, parliamentarians could potentially have faced sanctions for raising concerns about issues such as Islamist extremism and the grooming gangs scandal.
Phillips concludes: “Self-censorship is bad enough. But now there has been government censorship of the process by which that self-censorship is to be turned into outright submission.”
The Government must come clean about who helped shape this definition.
Read more in The Times below 👇
Canada’s Prime Minister says: “We cannot trust America.”
Meanwhile, his wife lives in the United States, all four of his children live and study in the United States, 91% of his investment portfolio is reportedly tied to the United States, and he owns a home in the United States.
Yet he tells Canadians they can’t trust America.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
🚨BREAKING: A petition to “launch a public inquiry into illegal migration” has passed 34k signatures in a few days.
It’s currently gaining 1200 signatures per hour, let’s give it a massive push.
Please sign and share ✍️
https://t.co/9zZyTgSAY0
With hindsight the first act of Tony Blair’s New Labour Government in 1997 ro remove the death penalty from the Treason Act explains everything. They knew they were all committing treason against the people and they were ok with that, but they didn’t want to hang for it.
🚨NEWS: Andy Burnham faces pressure to sack climate tsar who has racked up enough air miles to get to the Moon
Rachel Kyte has flown 250,000 miles in under two years including business class trips that cost taxpayers £107,000
Critics say the £130,000 a year role is pure hypocrisy after her flights alone produced 100 tons of CO2 ten times the average persons annual emissions
Typical Labour...
This has been agreed privately because Labour know exactly how unpopular it would be.
Andy Burnham wants to increase foreign aid from 0.2% to 0.7% of GNI, almost trebling the foreign aid bill.
While Britain is DROWNING in debt and our public services are deteriorating.
Why are we sending vastly more money abroad when we can't even fix the problems at home?
This government does not have Britain's best interests at heart. 🇬🇧