@MasonRZambrano Para mas lalo tumaas ang trust rating, harapin ang kaso. Kung walang bahid patunayan. Ganon lang ka simple kung ano ano pa ang naratibo niyo
@fierceLady08 Yung depensa na paulit ulit yung 32M, nung 2022 pa yun at malamang bawas na sila kc transparency & accountability ang issue ng kaso. Kung walang kasalanan harapin, kung walang bahid patunayan
Listening to Atty. Sison's opening argument is like listening to a low-tier DDS vlogger whose entire existence on YouTube is just a waste of data, server space, and oxygen.
Except she's wearing a corporate suit and speaking at a senate podium; while the low-tier DDS vloggers are just dugyot and chaka ad infinitum. ๐
Atty. Sison, letโs look at the 32M math youโre hallucinating over: half of those who voted for the useless VP in 2022 were actually solid PBBM supporters who now ABSOLUTELY ABHOR YOUR CLIENT AND WANT HER THROWN OUT OF OFFICE!
So, your data is an absolute
joke!
To stubbornly latch onto Sara Duterteโs dead 2022 vote count now that we are already into 2026 speaks volumes about how utterly flawed your logic is.
Youโre essentially parroting the dimwitted arguments of the DDS echo chamber on social media na matagal nang tinatawanan at kayo-kayo lang naman ang naniniwala.
In case you were living under a rock, let me remind you that public opinion shifts, political marriages shatter, and constitutional accountability doesn't freeze in time just to protect your client's feelings.
In fact, some of us are ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTED that we voted for your client.
So, donโt count us in that 32 million data, ok?
Dragging an expired 2022 alliance into a 2026 impeachment trial shows you didnโt really devour Cong. Luistro two weeks ago or so.
Sobrang pathetic ng arguments mo, Atty.
Youโre basically insulting the thinking class of this nation!
###
@YesYesYo13 Yung abogado ka pero mas lalo mo pinababa ang kalidad mo dahil sa isang post na walang kwenta. Kahit nakatawa ka sa post, behind is a different face