@YaBoiGAK I agree the current spot allocation is good and eu shouldn’t have more spots, all I’m saying is that eu was worthy of having 9 spots last year 👍
@YaBoiGAK #5 NOVO: Beat SSG 3-1 but lost in a double match point to top 4 RNTX, definitely worthy and a good debut performance
Top 4: Surely being top 4 in eu means you deserve worlds right. I mean TH did terrible but this kinda similar to SSG in Na
@YaBoiGAK #7 TTM: Good lcq run to make worlds. 1-1 against other regions, mid performance but still worlds worthy
#6 IC: Grouped by world champion CR and top 4 RNTX putting a good fight against both teams (1-3 and 2-3). Good chance they would have made worlds if not in group of death
@Ultra_110406@Devoid_5 Also, you haven’t seen TTM with joker play on lan since their win in 2023, how do you know they will be worse than TRB (who has nvr made past top 4)at LAN? Given Eu is more competitive, I would consider #4 TTM and #2 TRB around the same level, so it’s hard to tell
@Ultra_110406@Devoid_5 Most individual games in esports are close. I know the games will be close between TRB and FUT, but I am also 95% certain FUT will beat TRB. To me, I define ‘close’ from the bigger picture, match results, that’s why I consider it to not be close given how consistent EU beat NA
@Ultra_110406@Devoid_5 It has never been close eu has won 6 lans na has won 0. At lcq, Seed 7 and 8 Eu both beat na seed 4, that says a lot. Why does ttm not having success matter? That was with a diff roster, not the one that won a lan tgt with joker
@Ultra_110406@Devoid_5 But eu is more competitive no? So fut should be way better than trb than between trb seed 2 na and ttm seed 4 eu kinda hard to tell given trb good recent lan performance and the exact ttm roster won an international lan before