Young

A computer practitioner. a Department manager of a top 500 enterprises.I like traveling, reading and movies.

[Young @chinaparamount]

@harrapasabhyata 中国没有这样的地方。

[Young @chinaparamount]

人呢，到了60岁以后，就不要再相信自己的人格魅力了，再有魅力的人到了六十岁以后，终究还是老人了。不管你身体再好，也好不过普通三十岁的年轻人。如果有优势，那就是钱多。但到了日常生活住在一起过日子，有太多钱无法解决的东西

[Young @chinaparamount]

@LauraLoomer When will it be implemented and warmly welcomed by the Chinese people，Please expel the families of those corrupt officials as soon as https://t.co/r7YkdPpeWm addition, I don't believe that President Xi's daughter is in the United States.

[Bob @Build_Like_Bob]

reciprocity is a beautiful idea, but in its purest form, it assumes that all nations start from the same point on the game board. they don’t. the world isn’t a chess match where each player has an identical set of pieces. it’s poker—where some players sit down with stacks of chips and others are all-in from the start.

tariffs, subsidies, and trade barriers aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet. they are the manifestation of history. of wars fought, debts unpaid, alliances formed in fire, and economic miracles that came from a single moment of desperation. japan and germany rebuilt after world war ii under the umbrella of american security. china rose by leveraging the rules of the system the u.s. created. europe developed a high-tax, high-benefit model because of a cultural and historical trajectory that saw kings, revolutions, and the specter of war within living memory.

if trade were truly reciprocal, then history would have to be erased. the subsidies the u.s. gave to its own industries, the military protection extended to allies, the preferential access granted to developing economies—would all have to be unwound. the problem with this vision of fairness is that it ignores the asymmetry of the past. it assumes that the game began today.

alexander hamilton, in his “report on manufactures,” understood that young nations need protection to grow. he knew that free trade between a fully industrialized britain and an agrarian america wasn’t fair—it was a death sentence for u.s. industry. but when does protectionism stop being a ladder and start becoming a crutch? when does a nation move from “developing” to “fully developed”?

the genius of trade is not in its balance, but in its imbalance. the u.s. runs deficits because the dollar is the world’s reserve currency, and demand for it is endless. foreign nations send goods to the u.s., and the u.s. pays in dollars—dollars that often come back as investment in u.s. assets. this is not a flaw; it is the design. trade surpluses are not inherently good, just as deficits are not inherently bad.

perhaps the real question is not whether other nations should drop their tariffs but whether the u.s. should reimagine its own strategy altogether. does it double down on economic nationalism and pull its industries back home, accepting higher costs in the process? or does it use its structural advantages—its control over global finance, technology, and energy—to shape the rules in a way that no tariff ever could?

reciprocity is a starting point, not a solution. history proves that fairness in trade is rarely about simple math—it’s about leverage, vision, and the ability to see the board for what it truly is.

[Young @chinaparamount]

@grok @ByzGeneral @realDonaldTrump China is fine and has not collapsed.

[Young @chinaparamount]

@BrilynHollyhand 中国侵略美国了？真是天下奇闻。

[Young @chinaparamount]

正的内循环绝非靠口号或借贷消费，而是让百姓有钱、有闲、敢花：
1️⃣ 收入保障：大幅提高最低工资，严打欠薪，确保劳动者分享发展红利。
2️⃣ 时间解放：落实劳动法，杜绝996，让80%劳动者回归每周40小时，释放消费潜能。
3️⃣ 供给升级：通过科技创新与产业转型，提供匹配内需的高质量依赖，

[Young @chinaparamount]

@BradRTorgersen Your basic logic is wrong, isn't it?You seem to say that tariffs are wrong, as if the United States does not have a dead national tax.What everyone denies is that such a high tariff is to consciously trade with the world.

[Young @chinaparamount]

@BradRTorgersen @JenCoryAlvey It seems that you want to go back to the state of a small country with few people, which is torture, but the United States is free https://t.co/0kD2KEJz4t of the biggest beneficiaries.Imperialism opened the doors of other countries with strong ships and cannons.

[Young @chinaparamount]

https://t.co/s9DTvX6OAt

[Young @chinaparamount]

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @Tesla Production cuts are more like it, because sales will only continue to https://t.co/b31Vj3RwCe you really think bought your car because it's competitive? No, no, no, at least not in https://t.co/FzyqD7IV7m you kneel to Russia, the halo of your products is gone.

[Young @chinaparamount]

@elonmusk If we all listen to the people, what do we need politicians for?

[Young @chinaparamount]

Former British Prime Minister Bowles.Recently, he has gained a circle of fans in China, because he donated 80% of his personal belongings to Ukrainian refugees and the rest to public welfare.The Chinese praised him as a great man, a man out of bad taste, a pure man.

[Young @chinaparamount]

https://t.co/YzoFbZVx3C

[Young @chinaparamount]

https://t.co/5a7nSSbzkM

[Young @chinaparamount]

https://t.co/tJBQqUkeBu