Some people would rather make rich people poorer than help poor people get richer.
They spend all day angry about someone else’s money and almost no time asking why a mother can work from morning to night and still struggle to feed her children.
If someone got rich by providing great value to the world, good for them.
We actually need more people like that!
But don’t tell me you care about the poor when you spend more time resenting the rich than asking what would actually help the poor.
@DecebalStalin Yeah those kids online are also more emotionally troubled if they keep engaging in useless arguments online instead of meeting in person. I wish for these times back but how can I move forward if the rest of the world keeps hiding in a cave?
Lucy described a sin. Schroeder described a system.
Greedy people exist under every arrangement. Capitalism is the one that makes them ask instead of take. You keep your property, I keep mine, we trade only if both of us expect to come out ahead. No committee assigns the loaf. No official owns your hours.
If the deal requires a badge or a bayonet, it isn’t a market. It’s a shakedown. The reason poor countries got less poor is not that men became nicer. It’s that more people were allowed to say no—and still got paid when they said yes.
Me and my MAGA friends wake up each day looking forward to what Trump did while we were all sleeping. We stay happy all day doing things Americans like to do while our counterparts with TDS wake up more miserable each day. Why? Because without their knowledge, they have been TRAINED to hate Trump. That only happens to low IQ brains that are easily manipulated. MAGA people see right through each one of the hoaxes and laugh at how ridiculous the TDS sufferers are in their quest to finally GET TRUMP. But they never will because Trump has done nothing wrong. What a waste of a life.
@TheCensoredRock Oh, so you're okay with people insulting you, saying your opinion doesn't matter, and dehumanizing you by calling you a bot or a troll, or some other form of slur?
They all act like corporations are the devil in disguise, but they're fooling themselves. All over a stupid hobby and a fleeting sense of entitlement. Their egos know no bounds. They're gluttonous parasites to the video game industry.
I'm getting sick of these no lifers on the internet.
True gamers do not care about any of the crap the "vocal minority" nuts claim. They're terminally online folk who are just blinded by nostalgia and wishing for their childhood because they're utterly miserable.
Sony’s lawyers are arguing that it should already be obvious that PlayStation digital games aren’t actually owned by the people who buy them.
In the lawsuit, Sony points to its Software Product Licensing Agreement, which says: “The Software is licensed to you, not sold.”
Sony also makes a more unusual argument: if a customer actually owned a digital game, another person wouldn’t be able to buy the same copy.
They use Resident Evil Requiem as an example. One customer bought the game on February 14, 2026, and another bought it on February 25 for $69.99.
Sony’s argument is basically: if the first customer actually owned the digital game, how could Sony sell the same game to someone else
Because guess what? Nobody argues like this in real life, the keyboard warriors only exist online because they're miserable in real life and have zero social skills, no jobs, and only cherry pick what aligns with their emotions.
@Garin_Mizzrym@Pirat_Nation good to see you didn't read a single word I said, and continue to live in your fantasy world instead of joining the real world like everybody else.
@Fay_Sa that's a shitty strawman. "Digital is not a finite product" is equivalent to telling them they should keep copying the game for free for all eternity, disregarding the server costs and employee wages. You're implying artists shouldn't be compensated for their work.