Good morning! Is this real can anyone confirm this? This quite concerning. I remember people saying #SierraMadre played a huge role in breaking typhoons strength before it hit the cities. I truly hope this isn't real!!!!
I rarely tweet but let me say this.
This is a VERY SICK MAN. Please sa mga botante ng Pasig, do not vote for candidates like these. Read what he said. This man is gross.
Let me translate in English, “To all the single mothers who are still menstruating, you can sleep with me”
Ito ang kalidad ng mga kandidato natin. Please lang po. Mag-isip isip tayo.
👀 to all RPh
PURCHASE BOOKLET IS NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR THE 20% SENIOR CITIZENS' DISCOUNT.
The DOH just released the AO 2024-0017 today, December 23, 2024.
Ano pa lang accountability ang gusto niyong mangyare kay Maris? Mamatay na lang? She said her side of the story, she said she is sorry, she said she will do better, she took the fall. Baket hindi sya pwedeng maging emotional eh totoo naman na NAKED na sya in public?
THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE CASE OF MARIS RACAL AND ANTHONY JENNINGS
Even before screenshots of text or chat messages between Maris Racal and Anthony Jennings were leaked today, many people - especially those who were cheated on - have always asked me before about the legality of posting and sharing screenshots of private conversations.
I have always told them that there is such a thing called as the right to privacy. Even cheaters have human rights.
The National Privacy Commission (NPC) clarified in a 2020 advisory opinion that the Data Privacy Act applies to screenshots if they reveal the identities of those involved: “It is worthy to note that the processing, i.e. sending out the screenshot to another person, will only come under the scope of the DPA if personal data is indeed involved—if the conversation/screenshot itself allows for the identification of the parties. If it is simply the content of the conversation, with names and other identities redacted or cropped out of the screenshot, it might not be within the scope of the DPA.”
So even if you were the victim of cheating, by posting screenshots of any alleged affair, not only are you exposing yourself to cyberlibel charges but also to charges for violating data privacy - which is punishable by stiffer and harsher penalties than cyberlibel.
And while the Supreme Court just recently said that there is no violation of the right to privacy if screenshots are used in a criminal case, that is the caveat - the screenshots must be used in a criminal case.
So what’s a girl to do?
Well, you should still take screenshots as evidence of cheating or an affair (especially if you’re married).
Then, what you should do is instead of posting on social media is to file a VAW (violence against women) case - psychological violence caused by infidelity.
And if you’re a public figure or celebrity, let the media report or cover it - then you’ll get the publicity you wanted anyway without the legal liabilities for cyberlibel and data privacy.
When you present the screenshots as evidence in court, that’s when the Supreme Court ruling will apply - that taking screenshots of private conversion is not a violation of the right to privacy when used as evidence in a criminal case.
What’s unfortunate and what I find personally wrong in leaking the screenshots of Maris Racal and Anthony Jennings through social media is the slutshaming of Maris Racal because of her supposed “thirst trap/hungry” messages.
Look what statements have gone viral. 3-4 messages from Maris Racal and only 1, barely viral, from Anthony Jennings (about him disgustingly using method acting as justification).
Cheating is bad. But so is misogyny, enabled by violating the right to privacy.
Victims have human rights. But vindicating your rights should not make more victims.
Even cheaters have human rights.
#Law101
#HumanRights
Mil gracias a todos
Many thanks to all
Merci beaucoup à tous
Grazie mille à tutti
谢谢大家
شكرا لكم جميعا
תודה לכולכם
Obrigado a todos
Vielen Dank euch allen
Tack alla
Хвала свима
Gràcies a tots
Wala tayong pakialam kung magsulat si Sara ng libro. Pero kung gagastos ang gobyerno na 10M para sa aklat niya, ibang usapan 'yun. Aklat niya yun, ba't hindi siya ang gumastos? Iniaasa ni Sara ang gastos niya sa taumbayan. Walang karapatan si Sara na waldasin ang pera ng bayan.
To our lawmakers,
Stop victim blaming.
Treat victims with compassion and sensitivity. Reliving a traumatic experience is horrific, more so in a public hearing.
Stop barraging, asking “why did it take you 5 years? You should’ve filed a complaint immediately”. Victims are scared. They feel ashamed.
And this kind of public shaming will not help victims to come out.
Let me remind our senators, you serve the people. You are not gods. Do not act like it.
Hay.... This is on Niño Muhlach. He allows his son to be treated like this. Poor Sandro, harassed in a hotel room, harassed in the Senate. 🥺
Can someone complain Jinggoy sa Ethics Committee?