@happysadhag@CrewkerneGaz It takes a pretty horrible evil person to make an unpleasant comment on such a post. Perhaps the world would be better without you mistaking free speech for accurate speech? Just a thought!
@MatofKilburnia@rosie_wrighting You were not taken in by my words to start with and made an assumption as to who I do or don’t support.
Whoever is in power will need tax revenue to pay for public services. It’s not a party political point.
@jeffrey_bowers@rosie_wrighting If referencing the GINI coefficient as the measure of inequality it’s certainly prescient to consider the increasing number of people not working. They are included in calculating such a measure.
@indiboonan@rosie_wrighting It’s not clear who is doing the slinging. Labour are in Government and having to grapple with the very real complexity of that. That’s what we are witnessing.
@MatofKilburnia@rosie_wrighting I’m a supporter of honesty. The Labour MP has a point in raising the fact the sums do not work and you need to take an independent look at the figures… do not be taken in by Zac’s words which have no detail behind them.
@joewrighting_ A rounding error is a good way, a succinct way of putting it. In my opinion it would be good if during such debates the numbers could be displayed in graphs alongside the debate because it would really focus minds!
@robjeffecology@rosie_wrighting Depends on your choice of robot. What on earth do you think you mean by a Corporation which is the general term for a separate legal entity? Do you have any knowledge whatsoever on the matter?
@Pale333@rosie_wrighting The retweet was Terence Williams not Charlie Kirk. One imagines you can read and those who like your comment could take the time to check. However, it’s the same process of not thinking, following through in a detailed and realistic way which permits you to like Zac’s ideas.
@DDoom75094@danwootton There is a considerable degree of balkanisation happening in Britain which is rendering the wider geographical statement of ‘born in Britain’ less meaningful with respect to explaining the cultivation of ideologies.
@ElderGrizzly@danwootton On the balance of probability, you believe that two people have met up to stab other people randomly without any form of political or ideological underpinning? It was done for pleasure?
Charlie Kirk was not a racist and I will not sit back and allow people to spread that lie
I gave Charlie Kirk his flowers last year and thanked him for helping 100s of young black people get an invite to the White House back in 2019
He helped pay for most of their flights and hotels because it cost so much to travel and he didn’t want them to miss out
He have gave them an experience & opportunity of a lifetime and yes he helped me get an invite as well.
I’m going to miss him so much! ❤️
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
@ClarkeMicah@K_el_ph Interviewer continually played to the camera. Statements made at the end not genuinely to Peter but for the camera. If sincere, multiple occasions needed to move on, just 20 minutes in, notably at the point he didn’t process point legalisation increased availability to children.
@ClarkeMicah Fortunately, your mind alone remains open Peter. As you look upon us ‘thick’ people, who have it all backwards, you can use our uninformed remarks and opinions to sooth your ego. Sleep well 😴