chris farina

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Do it!

[TJ Morris @tjmorris_bear]

Hey y’all, we’ve got just 9 days left to get this list 100% complete to benefit Kaleb House, our countertrafficking & restoration non-profit. Please share and help out however you can!

https://t.co/rGgGoQa8o1

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

You're in the final examine. You better be paying attention and you better be ready.

[Linuxhippie @linuxhippie]

This is "Open Communications" to the Revolution to escalate.

If you disagree, you're wrong.

She's former CIA she knows exactly what she is doing and should not receive the benefit of doubt.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Wisdom yet the Marxists will push it until what is described becomes a reality. You better grasp this RIGHT NOW. Prepare. Find your tribe and be ready. All or nothing time approaches.

[Dave Parke @Dave_Parke]

I just caught up on some of the recent posts from @DataRepublican, and they’re chilling—not primarily because they outline a violent uprising, but because they reveal a strategy of manufacturing a constitutional crisis in which states declare the federal government illegitimate. What’s alarming is the sheer ignorance and hubris of the people treating this as a workable path. They appear to believe such a rupture can be contained or directed, yet they show little understanding of either American history or the practical consequences of delegitimizing the federal order.

The people driving this approach are largely led by academics who have never borne responsibility for real-world outcomes, military officers who couldn’t produce a coherent strategy to win a twenty-year war, and former intelligence officials whose records inspire little confidence. They seem prepared to sacrifice institutional stability—and the young idealists who would be drawn into the resulting chaos—while remaining safely removed from the fallout themselves.

What they fail to grasp is that the Constitution is not merely a set of rules that can be voided by state declaration. It is bound to the oaths of those sworn to defend it and to the habits of a population raised on the Bill of Rights. America is not Europe, China, or any other society in which a central authority can be nullified with limited resistance. Attempts to engineer a crisis of legitimacy will not remain a matter of legal posturing. They will collide with people who take their oaths seriously, and the resulting contest over authority is unlikely to stay bloodless.

The American Civil War remains the deadliest conflict in U.S. history. Roughly 2% of the population died—men, women, and children—in what was, by historical standards, a relatively conventional war fought between uniformed armies. Scaled to today’s population, that figure approaches 7.5 million dead. A modern breakdown in which states and the federal government treat one another as illegitimate would almost certainly be worse: a grinding conflict fought in neighborhoods, towns, and cities, where the line between friend and enemy would be unclear and ordinary life would become impossible. Anyone of consequence would carry a target, and trust would collapse.

This is not a call for violence. It is a plea to avoid the conditions that make violence probable. Many of us have seen what war actually does, and we understand the cost that would be imposed on the next generation because some believe their preferred political outcome can be forced by creating a crisis of legitimacy. Trump leaves office in two years. If the goal is to alter the constitutional order, the Framers already provided the mechanism for doing so. Use it. Do not manufacture a crisis that invites states to treat the federal government as illegitimate while others pay the price.

As Sherman put it: “It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.”

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

and the general public is in one of two camps. They support the "color revolution" or they support "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness". Everyone else is irrelevant.

[Eric Schwalm @Schwalm5132]

She's literally doing OPB on the legacy media, consistent with the "Delegitimizing the Federal Government Plan" that @DataRepublican has brought to light.

She's "sensitizing" the public to the statements they plan to issue when their CONOP goes into full effect, so what they say later on isn't near as shocking. The problem is she has the legacy media in her pocket, and the best we have is X.

We know what they are planning, but the legacy media and Facebook crowd have no clue about it. If we don't start getting the message out there, the general public is only going to see things one way.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Not dying is generally a worthwhile endeavor. Get well, Bear!

[TJ Morris @tjmorris_bear]

Hey Bear, whatcha been up to?

TRYING TO NOT DIE.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

I would advise that nothing should happen to Musk. Some capable people are watching and should anything happen there will be a reckoning.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Those who pick fights with me should understand that I will find out who is really pulling the strings and come for them, not just their puppets …

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

This did not happen as related from this post. Musk could not have done that. Someone in the admin or a "US Official" if they said that has something against Musk.

[OSINTtechnical @Osinttechnical]

Musk ordered the slowdown of a military-grade version of Starlink relied on by Ukraine, a decision that sparked panic in Kyiv and confusion inside the Trump administration - US officials to the WSJ

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

and yet most will fail to understand this....

[Linuxhippie @linuxhippie]

Islam. There's nothing "radical" about it.

Everything you call radical is straight out their "approved religious texts" and meets with Scholary Consesus which is authoritative.

It is simply a fact we chose to deny b/c it offends our sensibilities.

Keep making a distinction that jas no difference and we will be France or the UK in less than 20 years.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Yep. Most are

[TJ Morris @tjmorris_bear]

My timeline is half full of losers asking Grok dumb shit. These people vote.

Prepare accordingly.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Wisdom. Pay attention.

[AGAVE @agave_redux]

For the record, a small group of local men, organized, capable, and ruthless would've prevented this if they'd acted probably 3 years ago.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

@MikeBelcher14 I don't think they lag. They have as good as if not better infrastructure though they are more patient. They won't expose their true capability/capacity until they are assured things go the way they want.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Everything at their disposal though state security forces have waited too long. A common problem in COIN. Welcome to the front.

[Ezra A. Cohen @EzraACohen]

How much force should the Government of France use to repel an invasion?

[Mike Shelby @grayzoneintel]

This is far beyond what a police action can tackle, and there is no national will to shoot them.

The #1 mistake that governments make in low intensity conflict, by far, it’s not even close, is waiting too long to act.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

That and more. This is just the beginning of sorrows. Best be about doing the things America.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Y’all realize they have this planned for every western country, right?

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

The French people did not ask for this. Just like the American people did not ask for 30M invaders under Biden. State security forces by intent have waited to long to act. Their globalist focused leaders allowed this. What remains to be seen is backlash from the French citizenry.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:

Do not blame the French people for this.

We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.

Here are the numbers your media won't show you.

70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.

That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.

So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.

In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.

It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.

What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.

The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.

So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."

The French never chose this.

They were forced into it.

If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.

If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

She's going to run in 28..

[Clash Report @clashreport]

Hillary Clinton:

People ask me all the time, are we going to be able to rebuild and repair the damage? I hope so, but it's going to take time because a lot of people feel that they've been let down, maybe even lied to from time to time.

And that's not just a problem of our government. That's really a national problem.

We have to restore our trustworthiness in order to restore our leadership.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

and the corporation known as the OSS, later the CIA, took over America along with their mafioso and globalist allies.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Did you know:

In August 1940, the FBI secretly moved into Room 4332 of 30 Rockefeller Center called the RCA Building? It was the FBI's first known attempt to operate a cover/front company for the Special Intelligence Service. This was the US’s first civilian foreign intelligence service set up to counter Hitler’s spies. Their mission was to gathered intelligence about espionage, counterespionage, subversion, and sabotage links.

Why would the FBI select the Rockefeller Center? “It likely had something to do with the support that Nelson Rockefeller had provided to President Roosevelt’s intelligence work,” the FBI said. “Furthermore, on multiple occasions after the SIS’s creation, our personnel were afforded cover by Nelson Rockefeller’s Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs.

The FBI identified 887 Axis spies, 281 propaganda agents, and 222 agents smuggling strategic war materials in addition to radios and saboteurs according to the FBI.

Another reason the FBI chose this particular location is because there were many other 'spy' organizations located there. Rockefeller Center housed British Security Coordination (BSC) spies who operated under the guise of the British Passport Control Office. The BSC frequently used news organizations for propaganda; black propaganda, discrediting pro-Nazi or isolationist groups like 'America First.' Roald Dahl - later an author of children’s books including Willy Wonka - was one of 2,000 BSC spies. Many of its operatives were embedded in US newspapers, radio stations, and polling organizations. The British was manipulating US news, attacking any US organization that did not want the US to get involved in WW2.

Canadian-Scottish spy William Stephenson, who was a WWI fighter pilot and pal of 007 creator Ian Fleming - led the BSC from the 35th and 36th floors of Rockefeller Center where his team supplied intel on the Germans. The BSC used a 'news' organization called the Overseas News Agency to publish fake news stories to generate US support for the war. The BSC network also included its own radio station.

When US Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy to London returned to the US, MI6 spies present in the Rockefeller Center offices kept him under near constant surveillance. This was done with Winston Churchill's approval, according to Britain’s National Archives. https://t.co/H1TYQFy9CR

In one report that summarized the former ambassador’s recent trip to Hollywood. Britain was concerned that Kennedy, an outspoken opponent of US entry into WWII, could sway US public opinion. They deployed spies including British actor Douglas Fairbanks to keep an eye on Kennedy Sr. during his California trip.

Prior to WWII, US intelligence was done by the Department of State, Office of Naval Intelligence, and the War Department's Military Intelligence Division (MID). In 1941, FDR created the Coordinator of Information (COI) and named William ‘Wild Bill’ Donovan in charge.

Allen Dulles known for his role in the Rockefeller family oil interests in Turkey after WWI was appointed to run the OCI’s NYC office. Dulles took up shop in Room 3603 which was the same area as Stephenson’s BSC. They ran a joint intelligence operation. After Pearl Harbor, the COI became the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and Dulles moved to Switzerland.

Who else was in the building? The BSC operation was located three floors below the Japanese consulate initially. Rockefeller Center’s had 19 consulates in 1941. The Italian consul general closed theirs shortly after Pearl Harbor. American oilman William Rhodes Davis, who counted both Germany and Italy as customers and was located in the building was denied a lease renewal. The US Federal government eventually shut down the offices of German, Italian, and Japanese tenants.

Not to be left out, in 1948, the Allied Soviet Union opened an exhibit in Rockefeller Center featuring Russian exports such as vodka, sable furs, linen, and caviar. Alongside the delicacies were war posters and photographs showing Russians fighting against Nazi Germany. The exhibit attracted the Russian Ambassador and others to drop by Rockefeller Center during that time.

[TJ Morris @tjmorris_bear]

Insurance Companies BROKE | Natl Intel | Fresh Meat | Bear Brief 16OCT26

Also, the people at @TrulyFreeHome are DOPE AF and you should consider following them.

[chris farina @chrisfarina75]

Any time now...