Join @Coreysaling ( ⬅️ TurthSocial )as he test out my son’s impressive AR-15 he built from the ground up. From the range setup to that satisfying recoil, see how this custom build performs. Safety first, always! What do you think of his build? #Guns https://t.co/lxrk93okHz
Check out this asphalt paving crew laying down fresh pavement in the middle of a rainy day in Caldwell, Texas. Wet conditions make the job trickier, but they get it done. Real road work, no fluff. #Asphalt https://t.co/5s7W1OojZu
🚨 SHOCKING BETRAYAL AT THE SUPREME COURT! 🔥
Justice Clarence Thomas just EXPLODED in fury as the majority sells out America — rubber-stamping birthright citizenship for children of ILLEGAL INVADERS!
Thomas ROARED: The 14th Amendment was written for FREED SLAVES — NOT foreign lawbreakers flooding our nation!
This is EXACTLY what President Trump warned us about! The Constitution does NOT reward invasion!
America is being stolen in plain sight.
Thomas just DEMOLISHED the progressive lie that’s destroying our sovereignty.
WHO’S WITH US? Congress MUST act NOW before it’s too late!
🇺🇸 SAVE AMERICA 🇺🇸 #BirthrightCitizenship #SCOTUSScandal #TrumpWasRight #SecureTheBorder
CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG
Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.
📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent
💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference
Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.
The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.
Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.
I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.