My talk from #ixd19 "Using randomness to break down biases" is now online. I talk about crazy eights, @OblStrats, @trytriggers, and product tarot readings. Part of #adversarial#prodmgmt. https://t.co/6433vanrp3
@emollick Totally agree! There are some interesting directions to go with this to adapt to the rituals that people do together and invite the agents in.
Screenshot of a vibe-generated possible kickoff meeting screen.
@emollick Agents could trigger when we need to reconvene as a team to update our assumptions/plans (e.g. new competitive threat, customer behavior changes, user research disagrees). Not sure what to call it though...
8 min speculative talk about this: https://t.co/xmrIP75WhY
I'd argue we should generate leadership personas from more intimate meeting transcripts. It will get much closer to the real thing. This avoids blindspots and less ideal characteristics that are real. The leader could still offer commentary on why they are like that.
@kenneth0stanley It seems the evidence is against there being system 1/2 in human cognition which is interesting that we keep trying to apply this concept other areas.
I've been really interested in the emergence of reasoning through discourse from this book: https://t.co/76avpcSxYg
@IAmClintMurphy I'm not sure most of these are decision making tools as much as they are heuristics and common biases...
Decision making can be simplified when we take a simple lens but then we can't understand the complicatedness or complexity that is more appropriate for other decisions.
๐พ๐ฅ๏ธ๐ Inside the Personal Computer: An Illustrated Introduction in 3 Dimensions: A Pop-Up Guide. Text by Sharon Gallagher. Paper engineering and design by Ron van der Meer (1984). Posting this and more as we get our #retrocomputing series ready for next month!
๐พ๐ฅ๏ธ๐ Inside the Personal Computer: An Illustrated Introduction in 3 Dimensions: A Pop-Up Guide. Text by Sharon Gallagher. Paper engineering and design by Ron van der Meer (1984). Posting this and more as we get our #retrocomputing series ready for next month!
@PawelHuryn I think it is important to identify these as uncertainties that need to be worked with rather than risks that need to be mitigated. @vaughn_tan has a great piece about the differences between these two things: https://t.co/KZ6WjfCStG
@josh_alby@nurijanian@RichardRumelt Yes, absolutely. You can read the original canvas post with all of the background from Rumelt here: https://t.co/vA7n8lSrsl
A completely packed room for a controversial take from the Chaotic Good Product Manager at GitHub - @chrizbot
"Product operations in the real world: meetings are good, actually"
At #Agile2024
@hnshah I've been thinking a lot about this while reading "The Problem with Change" and "The Friction Project" at the same time. Maybe the exceptional variation in our lives should be less and the ability to find meaning should be more?