Frank Doyle ⛧

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@butforwales Agnosticism and a/theism aren’t mutually exclusive.
The NT contains ethnocentrism, tribalism, slavery accommodation, and a whole lot of Paul negotiating practical realities instead of articulating universal moral principles.
So… sorry about your shitty morals.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@PhysicistTx @lippyent I mean, if its Rhoda it's Mary Richards ;)

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@darwintojesus yikes.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@Theg1Seese @Ernest1588761 Sorry, I'm not afraid of fairy-tales. Good luck with that :)

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@RameseSanders @Crypt0_Facts

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@rzdchxrry Katzenjammer - Demon Kitty Rag https://t.co/oouu0eVnFT via @YouTube

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@5FITCEO You don't need to feel guilty about it dude.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@FRosyrat96857 @amybordo @maklelan Maybe you should’ve learned that the 1st Amendment protects people from government restrictions on religion and speech — not from private companies enforcing their own uniform rules.

MLB isn’t the government.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@SaraForTexLege @CollierForTexas

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@CrusadrPatriot1

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@Diana152281

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@GianmarcoSoresi coming soon:

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@GodlessEngineer "love your neighbor" is from Leviticus .. and it isn't about "love" but tribalism.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@DeChristianguy Good job :)

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 I mean the exact same thing the first 12 times I said and you ignored it. Thanks for helping me prove my point. I'm not interested in continuing further with you. Be well :)

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 I literally said it doesn't prove that they "forced the narrative" ... I said it means the claims aren't as cut and dry as you say. Over and over again.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 This isn't a representation of what I've done, its what you're doing. You weren't there, but you've come to conclusion.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 because it makes sense to reject it. You are making evidence free claims that self-aggrandize. It's the least serious part of your argument.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 2c) But it does mean the truth of prophetic fulfillment claims and textual connections isn’t necessarily as straightforward as you’re presenting it.

You keep framing this as though I’m making claims about motives.

I’m not.

I’m talking about history and interpretation.

[Frank Doyle ⛧ @churble]

@toyosioyejobi @Michael64422597 @athiestboi @ragamuffinman33 1c) Right.

That’s literally the point I’ve been making.

The authors knew the texts, interpreted Jesus through those texts, and then wrote narratives connecting the two.

That doesn’t make them dishonest and it doesn’t mean they had “a bone to pick.”