cinemasquared

Yo

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli i appreciate that, and likewise share the same sentiment. take care.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli i agree with everything you said, but i simply cannot agree that people who intentionally sexualize real childlike features, even if drawn and fictional, are "normal".

artists reference the real world. the idea of "young" & "child" that is used for loli, is based on real world.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli you care about what other people do since you were disgusted by someone posting a real life child online, and reasonably so.

you act as if everyone involved is "fictosexual" which is false. it is factual that there are cases that lead to real life actions, stemming from loli.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Sirikamiloli @cero170L if anything it actually proves that there is correlation. when you look at the ratio between rape and sexual offence against children, why is it such a massive leap in the amount of crimes? youre looking at 15x-20x
more offences against children.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli thats fair. but you have to consider the purpose of things.

loli as a concept (very petite/young looking but older age) can certainly exist, but explicit sexualization of such should not occur.

there are people who deliberately make their lolis suggestive and such.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Sirikamiloli @cero170L the stats prove nothing, especially specifically related to loli. there are numerous other asian countries with similar (or even better) stats such as indonesia and pakistan that heavily regulate and restrict access to pornography. there is no concrete answer you can derive.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Sirikamiloli @cero170L perhaps not in all cases, but you cannot deny that it has happened and will continue to happen. if even one such case is preventable to protect children then it is worth it.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli i think you misinterpreted my 2nd passage. what i mean is, the people who indulge in loli content have and will further develop pedophilic tendencies. if they are sexualizing and fiddling with lolis, they will inevitably seek out real children. thats what theyre into.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli you implied that it is okay because you said arent disturbed in the slightest by it.

as long as people find an easily accessible GATEWAY (lolis), it inevitably will involve real children. these are genuine pedophiles in the making.

think about that for a second.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli youre okay with sexualizing fictional children? well alright.

"Why should I care about what someone else fiddles with regarding what they see?"

then you are also fine with people fiddling with actual CSAM?

if you care about one thing, i think you should care about the other!

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli i agree, that guy is not right in the head for doing such a thing. still doesnt mean anything here. the fact is, lolis are designed to be childlike and there are people who sexualize them. that is also wrong, so why are you trying to defend it? why does that not disturb you?

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli youve yet to refute the main point. fictional humans follow real life principles. ultimately lolis are drawn to be childlike. they should not have any "allure" to them. you look at a loli, you think child and childlike. yes? so why defend the sexualization of such characters?

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@cero170L @Sirikamiloli so explain what natural blue hair has to do with anything? they are still drawn to be childlike.

to depict "someone" as young and childlike:

small body, hands, feet
short
rounded face
facial proportions - large eyes (relative to face), small nose, etc

children and lolis share

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@nahte099 @ChibiReviews please research what the term pedophile means. not saying that what he did isnt wrong, but it isnt pedophilia.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@feviknight first they couldve dove (diamond+ knows how to), then they have slow reactions, inputs, AND misplayed (like pure autopilot w/ zero thought). it isnt one mistake or slight under performance. this is a master and flex challenger player legitimately being horrible. boosted for sure.

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Sebastrzian @MakkroLoL how are you defending this LOL

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Krzws1 @CosmicSaltyy @LaymansTakes @Abyss_ix i mean after reviewing that game idk what youre expecting an adc to do. he did the most dmg and was playing poke varus. that is his ONLY job. all adcs are passengers at this point.

you are saying: "even without varus dmg and taking ryze/rumble burst, they win" which is false

[cinemasquared @cinemasquared11]

@Krzws1 @CosmicSaltyy @LaymansTakes @Abyss_ix how can you watch these games and ignore the amount of pressure guma absorbs to call him a passenger? coming out ahead of every lane against viper was crucial to their victory at MSI as well. saying guma doesnt contribute to wins and is simply a passenger in HLE is crazy.