citydreaming

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@Field_FTP @51chappie City have always evidenced their sponsorship with etihad was paid from Etihad. in 2015 and now. Etihad/UAE gov are the same funds. its a state airline. prem believes different, payments are from ADUG, city deny that.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@Field_FTP @51chappie not denied gov money - etihad is state owned and paid by UAE gov. all etihad sponsorship was declared each season and the prem signed off on city’s accounts. £960 over 9 years was declared and recorded. prem just believes etihad paid it from ADUG, city evidenced otherwise.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@JimOhSoSpurs IC found no evidence that contradicts city’s contracts or proof people lied, they just didn’t believe the evidence shown. 3 FFP breaches went to CAS and only one was over 5 yrs the other two had no evidence and city were fined €10m for lack of compliance.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@Therealbubbledj @51chappie city like to think so

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@Gunneruni @51chappie clearly

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@Field_FTP @51chappie read the IC decision yourself

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@JimOhSoSpurs and city say it were paid from the correct account. lack of evidence on the prem side, like what uefa lost their case on at cas.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@ManCityKD prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it as income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@____TJ_______ prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it as income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@TheClubLiveTw prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it as income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@mammutly prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it as income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@DanisMCFC prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it as income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@pundit_jay prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported by city btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was income but claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@GeronimoMorgans prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was fair value but has claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@WeAreTheOverlap prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was fair value but has claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@talkSPORT prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was fair value but has claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@FPLMaineRoad prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was fair value but has claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.

[citydreaming @citydrm]

@SJR78758844 prem hasn’t found city guilty of receiving £840m more in sponsorship money than reported btw that money was always meant to be paid to city over the 9 years they agreed with etihad. prem approved it was fair value but has claimed the money was paid out of the wrong bank account.