NFL ranks in "Supporting Cast Rating" over the last five years
Supporting Cast Rating: Average team PFF grades in rushing, receiving, run blocking and pass blocking
Example: 49ers average five-year rank (3.6) gives them the best supporting cast, Giants (26) makes them the worst
I was the Justin Herbert vote.
The guy had the worst offensive line in the NFL all season and despite that he was working miracles in almost every single game.
Stafford's OL became 2/5ths as bad as Herbert's for 5 minutes and he became a turnover howitzer.
He embodied 'value'.
Meh, I don't know.
Why listen to Fred Warner, Tom Brady, Joe Montana or Peyton Manning when a casual Twitter troll is right there, ready to break down Justin Herbert like a true expert?
I'm not sure who to listen to.
Many are justifying the Kyle Tucker signing, by saying that any owner could spend like the Dodgers but “they just don’t want to win enough”. This is the most idiotic take I’ve ever seen. It shows you know nothing about the business side of the game.
MLB let Dodgers keep almost all of their TV Money. They are the only team that gets to do this because of negotiations during the McCourt Bankruptcy.
After the bankruptcy settlement, They negotiated the largest local TV deal in all of MLB but the settlement amount subject to revenue share was based on the OLD contract. They do not have to share most of their TV money and this is what allows the insane spending. Again, they are 1 of 30 teams to get this carveout from the league and the only team who could even attempt to spend like this.
Stop saying other owners are cheap. None of them have a special exemption on revenue sharing for their TV contracts like the Dodgers do. MLB Created this situation.
@FTFonFS1@DannyParkins Herbert combined for 216 yards passing/rushing while the Chargers had 207 yards of total offense.
… Against the second highest pressure rate any QB has faced this season (highest was him against Philly in the reg season).
What was he supposed to do?