@BohuslavskaKate To be fair, as of 2026 the U.S. provided three complete Patriot batteries from its stockpiles, as well as signing a deal in 2025 to provide 25 further systems. In addition, U.S. intelligence still provides information to Ukraine regarding launches, including in real time.
@magi_jay It’s kind of an initiation for every transplant. You’re now an official Minnesotan! You’ll get your certificate allowing unlimited passive/aggressive driving from MNDOT in 3-5 business days. (Get well soon!)
@Mylovanov One can always count on Sikorski for a bellicose but purely performative rant. Like Blumenthal and Graham, he’s great for sound bites, but in terms of actually influencing policy he’s pure sound and fury.
@BohuslavskaKate The Ukrainians, unfazed by Macron’s fantasy of a French-led European la gloire, understand the hard realities of current great power politics.
@yarotrof This clearly falls far below Ukraine's needs. However, with current production reaching only 600+ units in 2025 and massive global demand (i.e. the Middle East), European states cannot meet the necessary demand through purchase and donation without weakening their own defenses.
@BohuslavskaKate Russia’s 1.2 million casualties constitute about 0.8% of Russia’s population while Ukraine’s 600,000 losses mark about 1.4%. A truly catastrophic human toll.
https://t.co/ZkfhpVY0Er
@magi_jay Here’s one source from early last year from Pew. It mirrors nearly all the recent polling I found in a quick Google search.
https://t.co/eR2LrTXDst
@BohuslavskaKate Given the development, testing, and procurement process, it will be "Nightfall" in about a decade or so. However, it's still a positive that the UK is integrating potential Ukrainian needs in its long-term defense planning.
@shashj Unfortunately, Europe’s predicament in both instances illustrates European weakness as a result of decades of over dependence on the U.S. A Europe that invested adequately in its own defense capabilities wouldn’t be in either scenario.
@OlenaHalushka The Russians rarely fail to take advantage when other international issues dominate media attention, thus allowing them to strike with little fear of widespread coverage.