Last week the story was that TikTok censored anti-Trump/ICE/Pretti videos after the U.S. ownership change. We investigated with a large set of US TikTok data and found some interesting results, short thread...
TikTok said a power outage caused glitches that some creators attributed to political bias and censorship. "I believe it," writes @enbrown. Do you? https://t.co/ZUVnCseoet
We've made significant progress in recovering our U.S. infrastructure with our U.S. data center partner. However, the U.S. user experience may still have some technical issues, including when posting new content. We're committed to bringing TikTok back to its full capacity as soon as possible. We'll continue to provide updates. Thanks for your patience.
Your TikTok is not being censored.
The app is down.
The NFL has posts from yesterday with zero views.
If you believe they bought TikTok for $14 billion and would willingly pull the plug on the whole app for 36+ hours then sure, I guess you're being censored.
#digitaldiplomacy is about authenticity, trust, and long-lasting partnerships. We at the Italian Embassy believe engaging with platforms, creators, and influencers is key. Conversations like yesterday's only prove this! Thanks to all who participated.
/1 🚨 @TikTok_US is launching AMBER Alerts in the US with @NCMEC, bringing important, real-time alerts directly to peoples’ For You feeds to raise awareness of missing children. Together we can make a difference. 🔗 Learn more: https://t.co/QREwNhyDD9 #AMBERAlert#TikTok
General Manager of @TikTok U.S. Data Security, Andy Bonillo, sat down with @LisaRemillard to share more about the concrete steps we’ve taken to safeguard U.S. user data, going far and beyond what any other company is doing.
Watch the full interview here: https://t.co/bPcstM6XDZ
/1 A NEW report by @OxfordEconomics highlights TikTok's role in driving job growth. In 2024 alone, 7.5 MILLION U.S. businesses used TikTok, powering 28 MILLION jobs. 🇺🇸 From small startups to major brands, businesses of all sizes are leveraging TikTok to expand, engage, and thrive. 💼
Congressman admits mistake in voting for TikTok ban
Applause to @WesleyHuntTX for this powerful and courageous oped @FoxNews@FoxNewsAI
https://t.co/UglECg8x7y
TikTok Ban Is Misguided Attack on Free Speech
"Democrats are not the only ones who have lost touch with voters. There are several Republicans who have joined the fight to ban an app loved by millions of voting Americans."
https://t.co/BxuiCvqpwm via @RCPolitics
STATEMENT FROM TIKTOK:
In agreement with our service providers, TikTok is in the process of restoring service. We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive.
It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States.
ICYMI: I join @tiktok_us today as a form of civil disobedience. To the 170 million Americans using @tiktok_us: Don’t give in and don’t give up. Resist.
Find me on Tiktok: https://t.co/cPLjMV3sbq
Whatever its status under the First Amendment, the so-called TikTok law serves to limit and control speech. Remember: It doesn’t just apply to TikTok. That’s a key fact that is consistently overlooked.
It’s an effort to intimidate U.S. owners of social media companies (again, not just TikTok) with a threat of forced divestment if they don’t comply with potentially unlawful government demands. Play ball or face accusations you’re “subject to the direction or control” of a foreign adversary.
The Trump administration must work with Congress to repeal it.
If TikTok is not sold before the law goes into effect, the United States will join these countries that have also completely banned the app:
China
India
Iran
Afghanistan
Somalia
Nepal
Senegal
Kyrgyzstan
Uzbekistan
STATEMENT: Our unique national commitment to freedom of expression requires more caution than today’s ruling delivers. The unprecedented ban of a communication platform used by 170 million Americans demands strict judicial scrutiny, not the rushed and highly deferential review the Supreme Court instead conducted.
The Court explicitly notes the “inherent narrowness” of today’s decision. FIRE will hold it to that promise, and fight to contain the threat the ruling poses to our First Amendment rights.