ClaDAn

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@GiorgiaMeloni Ma quindi niente Nobel?

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@NProtasoni Come mi metto la label “bimba di Protasoni”sul gruppo Reddit TBTF?
Sono accettate anche le bimbe maschio con la barba?

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@NProtasoni Aspetto con ansia la puntata Bond Vs Bond ETF solo per i dissing

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@hartsfwa @StephenKing

[Stephen King @StephenKing]

Alex Pretti was murdered.

[(TCAG) Командир Бред Кроуфорд (CDR Brad Crawford) @evo1tactical]

I do not usually comment on political posts, and this is not intended to be political. As we all know a tragic event happened in America. I am speaking strictly from a professional training and use of force perspective.

Before coming to train Ukrainians, I spent years training various law enforcement organizations through my company on use of force and high risk encounters. That background includes departmental policy, police training standards, threat assessment, de escalation, and the legal thresholds for justified and unjustified shootings.

Several facts matter here.

The individual involved was a licensed concealed carry holder from the state. He was legally permitted to carry a firearm, including in a public setting such as a protest. There was no violation of law simply by his possession of the weapon.

At no point did this individual draw, point, or openly brandish the firearm. The weapon was physically removed from him by law enforcement officers prior to the shooting. Once that occurred, the immediate deadly threat no longer existed.

When a weapon is secured and officers have physical control of a subject, the legal and training based justification for deadly force disappears. At that stage, the situation transitions to control, restraint, and de escalation. Deadly force is reserved for an active, imminent threat, not a past or hypothetical one.

Any use of deadly force also carries an absolute responsibility to consider public safety. Officers are trained to identify their backstop and ensure that rounds fired do not endanger civilians or fellow officers. In this case, there were multiple officers and civilians directly within the potential line of fire. The risk of catastrophic injury, friendly fire, or unintended civilian casualties was extremely high.

Equally important, this incident does not align with established de escalation principles. Rather than slowing the encounter, increasing distance, and reducing risk, the situation was escalated rapidly to lethal force after control had already been achieved. That is the opposite of what modern policing doctrine teaches.

Based on the available video footage, camera angles, and observable officer behavior, this incident reflects failures in threat assessment, use of force decision making, backstop awareness, and de escalation. From a professional standpoint, it represents a breakdown across multiple training and policy standards.

This is a tragic outcome. It deserves a serious, objective review grounded in established law enforcement practices, not emotion or politics.

This definatley deserves a full independent investigation and review.

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@GiorgiaMeloni Finalmente presidente, alziamo la testa davanti alle angherie di un bullo, la prego di non farcela più riabbassare.

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@saras76

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@bankeronwheels Official post of the white house account

[Magoo PhD @HodlMagoo]

1) Agent (a) calls “Gun”.

2) Agent (b) unholsters his weapon.

3) Agent (a) disarms suspects weapon, which was in its holster.

4) Agent (a) accidentally discharges confiscated handgun.

5) Agent (b) shoots suspect in back

[PoliticsGirl @IAmPoliticsGirl]

Today is the tipping point.

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@bankeronwheels That’s my first guess.
Probably MAGA people don’t love big professors that can calculate percentages and localize animals in the continents, so in this way he shows he doesn’t care about these irrelevant scientific details

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@NProtasoni Però indiscutibilmente numero 1 per copertina

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@NProtasoni Se leggi i commenti nel post originale ti cadono i capelli

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@ChrisRicchiuti Botta e risposta entrambe senza senso

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@andst7 @grok questa foto è realmente di ieri?

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@matteosalvinimi Siete al governo, quindi qual è il senso di questo post?
1) Stiamo per presentare il DDL
2) Cavalchiamo il fatto di cronaca berciando alla pancia del mio elettorato ma sapendo che non lo faremo mai

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@AnitaCecolin Ai rapinatori piace questo post

[ClaDAn @cladand]

@luigivanti Solita confusione tra clima e meteo