clair taylor

[Alan @A1an_M]

The legislation to mandate folic acid in all non-wholemeal flour (and therefore de facto, introducing it to almost all processed foods containing flour) was introduced in Parliament via a "statutory instrument".

There is an increasing trend for government to do this, rather than use primary legislation, and it means there is less scope for debate and scrutiny, allowing bad, and unwanted, law to end up on the statute books.

This needs to stop. It's just another example of how broken our "democracy" is.

Government might say "but this is just a detailed technical measure, uncontroversial, no need for a full debate or Act of Parliament ".

Wrong wrong wrong!

This is mass medication of the public, without informed consent, when there are known and acknowledged dangers to health.

[clair taylor @clairmtaylor]

So proud of these two students!

[岐阜聖徳学園大学 @shotokuu]

全国語学教育学会のイベントで人文学部の2年生2名が発表しました - https://t.co/DXGxkeygRR

[clair taylor @clairmtaylor]

:-)

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Six years on from lockdown.

Restore Britain will quash all convictions for non-violent breaches of lockdown rules - nobody will have a criminal record for breaking insane laws that should never have been implemented.

We will refund fines, and the state will apologise. A line will be drawn.

Vast non-COVID medical harm directly caused by lockdown and fear messaging will be properly investigated. The truth will not be concealed any longer by an establishment complicit in the guilt.

We will tell the truth.

Life years lost will be how we measure lockdown's impact - demonstrating the horrific suffering that was inflicted on the young. Delayed diagnosis/missed treatment for cancer, heart attacks, everything.

The impact on children's development will be fairly and independently analysed. The results will be presented, to show the damage that lockdown did to millions of children. For ZERO benefit.

Targeted tax breaks will be introduced to industries still reeling from the impact.

Those who lost their jobs because they refused to take the COVID vaccine will also be properly compensated for financial loss and reputational damage.

A Restore Britain Government would apologise for vaccine mandates and passports.

That was morally repugnant - it would be formally accepted by Parliament.

Those who have lost their lives because of that will be recognised. The Vaccine Damage Payment scheme will be overhauled to actually deliver proper compensation to those affected today, and to the families of those who have lost loved ones.

It should always have been an entirely free choice for adults - no persuasion, no blackmail, no mandates. None of it. I hated it.

Those who implemented all of this will be investigated by a fully independent commission.

If they have been found to falsely manipulate and twist the evidence to push a damaging pro-lockdown agenda, they will go to prison.

If they were found to allow the injection of healthy young children with that vaccine, knowing the damage that would be caused? Prosecutions will follow.

To the many decent Reform voters who hold the same concerns…

If you want to campaign to put Nadhim Zahawi into Parliament, that is your choice. Stay in Reform.

The man wanted to allow children to overrule their parents in order to take the COVID vaccine? Can you back him? Ask yourself that honestly.

Restore Britain will fight to keep him out.

Join us.

Accountability is what we need. And that is what Restore Britain would deliver. A political party to finally fight for lockdown accountability.

We won’t simply pretend none of it ever happened.

We will ensure that it doesn’t happen again, and we will ensure that those who were responsible are held accountable.

[clair taylor @clairmtaylor]

This

[Alexandra Wilson @amwilson_opera]

"A significant return to paper and pen is required...Everybody in higher education knows this already. But not everybody will admit it. University administrators in particular don’t want to admit it".

https://t.co/t2ljQNovXj

[clair taylor @clairmtaylor]

🙏 🙏 🙏

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Restore Britain’s policy on Digital ID is clear - it is one of the most dangerous shifts in the relationship between the individual and the state in modern British history.

A compulsory Digital ID has been temporarily halted, not permanently scrapped - this is important to remember.

Through systems like Gov UK One Login, millions of people are being pushed into a centralised identity system just to access basic services or operate a business. Company directors are being told to comply or lose the ability to function as a LTD company. This is unacceptable.

We are already seeing the expansion into digital wallets, digital driving licences, digital veteran cards and even schemes for children.

If you can control identity, you can control access to services, to work, to travel, to participation in everyday life. To vote. I detest it.

That is the direction of travel. And it must be stopped. A Restore Britain Government would end the mission creep of a surveillance state and allow people to easily live offline if they choose to do so.

We will scrap mandated enforcement of One Login and allow people to opt out fully, with a clear and reliable offline alternative using physical documentation.

We will guarantee that every citizen can access public services without digital verification. No one will be excluded, penalised, or locked out for choosing to live offline.

There will be no discrimination. Freedom of choice will be restored.

We will repeal the expansion of digital ID through the children and wellbeing schools bill legislation where NHS numbers are being converted into lifelong Digital IDs. The state has no right to build lifelong tracking systems for children.

We will oppose mandatory ID or biometric verification for accessing the internet. People must be free to speak, engage, and participate online without being forced to identify themselves.

We will end centralised data control. No single system should hold the keys to a person’s identity and access to society.

Restore Britain will end facial recognition in public spaces. We will roll back mass surveillance. The British public are not suspects or walking barcodes.

We will respect our veterans and not use them as guinea pigs to trial digital ID through digital veteran cards.

And most importantly, we will protect your right to live offline.

No government should be able to force digital ID onto the British people.

In a free country - you should not need permission, a login, or a digital profile to exist.

Restore Britain will defend that principle.

We will protect your right to live lawfully, freely and privately.

There is now a serious political party willing to draw a line and say enough is enough.

Restore Britain.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Cattle perform alchemy. They convert grass (inedible to humans) into:
- Meat, milk, butter, cheese
- Tallow, leather, bone tools
- Manure for fertilizer

This transformation built civilizations.

Humans can't eat grass. Grass grows on 70% of agricultural land.

Without ruminants, that land is useless for food.

The anti-cattle narrative ignores this.

"Land used for cattle should grow crops!"

65% of cattle grazing land is marginal terrain unsuitable for crops. Too steep, rocky, dry, poor soil.

You cannot grow soy on Scottish highlands. You can graze cattle.

Cattle aren't competing with crops. They're utilizing land that can't grow crops.

Historical civilizations that thrived all utilized ruminants:
- Nomadic herders (Mongols, Bedouins)
- Pastoral societies (Maasai, Plains Indians)

All converted marginal land into nutrition.

Modern policy wants to remove cattle, "rewild" land, import food from industrial agriculture.

Less efficient, not more.

Using cattle to convert grass to food on land that can't grow crops is optimal resource use.

Leaving land idle while importing Amazon soy is environmental destruction.

The grass-to-nutrition conversion is irreplaceable. Plant agriculture can't do this.

Humans evolved eating ruminants that converted grass to meat.

Not eating soybeans from cleared rainforest.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Cows are destroying the planet!" —Bill Gates, who’s invested millions in lab-grown meat while ignoring the real solution.

Turns out, he’s dead wrong.

At White Oak Pastures, regenerative farming doesn’t just offset emissions—it reverses them. Their beef is carbon-negative, with a footprint 111% lower than industrial systems. Their model is 6x more carbon-efficient than the U.S. average, proving beef can heal the land, not harm it.

Michigan State University found regenerative grazing sequesters 3,678 lbs of CO₂ per acre yearly, cutting emissions by 32% vs. factory farming. The Soil Carbon Cowboys show well-managed grazing locks away 1 ton of carbon per acre. And Rodale Institute? Up to 3.5 tons per acre—beating forests.

While Gates pushes fake meat, real farmers are fixing the climate with soil, sun, and smart grazing. The future isn’t synthetic—it’s regenerative.

Want to fight climate change? Skip the lab-grown hype. Buy beef that builds soil, not billionaires’ portfolios.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

One by one the Gates' conspiracies are falling apart.

Researchers at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln have discovered that pastures where cattle graze can capture more emissions than what the cattle produce themselves.

"Grasslands can take up more CO₂... that offsets the CO₂ the cattle are producing, but also offsets the methane."

[Freedom Alliance @UKFreeAlliance]

The list of MPs opposing digital ID is growing but not fast enough.

We must encourage others to write to their MPs. The more pressure they are under from their constituents, the more likely they will oppose.

Freedom Alliance have a template letter you can use. Visit our website today and join the fight. https://t.co/eUyO9QBIkx

[clair taylor @clairmtaylor]

@RupertLowe10 @AlecShelbrooke @morton_wendy @RosieDuffield1 please, please sign the letter.

[岐阜聖徳学園大学 @shotokuu]

第９回高校生英語レシテーションコンテストが開催されました - https://t.co/G760m9rn8F

[岐阜聖徳学園大学 @shotokuu]

大垣市で開催されたコミュニティ英語イベントでボランティアをしました - https://t.co/QG7OA4ABPd

[Rowena da Silva trindade @miccamaccamoo]

To any other company directors and those worried about Digital ID.

The government can’t just decide that something has legal force — it must be lawfully served.
Let’s break that down in plain language so it’s crystal clear 👇

⚖️ 1️⃣ Service in law means proof of delivery

Under the Postal Services Act 2000 and the Interpretation Act 1978, a notice is only “served” when:

it’s delivered to your proper address, or

handed to you in person, or

sent electronically with your explicit consent.

If they never gained your explicit consent to accept “digital service,” they cannot presume it.

So if government departments, HMRC, or Home Office try to switch you to a digital identity or communication system (for example, a https://t.co/UndQeOVZL9 “One Login” or digital certificate) without you formally agreeing, you are not legally bound by it.

🪶 2️⃣ Digital systems still sit under postal law

Even where departments rely on the Electronic Communications Act 2000, they must:

inform you in writing that future communication will be digital,

obtain your consent, and

ensure there’s a verifiable record of receipt (digital signature, confirmation, or logged acceptance).

That Act does not override the Universal Postal Union conventions or domestic service rules — postal service remains the highest evidential standard in the UK for legal notices.

🛑 3️⃣ Digital ID ≠ Legal Identity

A digital ID (like the one https://t.co/UndQeOVZL9 is pushing) is an administrative tool, not a lawful replacement for natural or sovereign identity.
It can’t supersede your living status or property rights unless you voluntarily enrol and authenticate yourself.
So, yes — if they ever try to “serve” or impose a digital identity upon you, you can rightly insist:

“Until I am lawfully served, and I have freely consented, you have no authority to assign or compel a digital identity in my name.”

💬 4️⃣ What to say if challenged

If an agency insists on “digital-only service” or a “digital ID” requirement, your lawful response is:

“I require all notices to be served by post under the Postal Services Act 2000.
I do not consent to digital service. Please confirm that you have recorded my preference.”

That keeps you within the law and out of their automated trap.

[Andy Coates @AndyWoodturner]

Look at this display…every variety they grow. Glorious.

[ShotokuLiNK @ShotokuMELT]

Come listen to Shotoku students, Yuta and Hiyo, talk about their experiences doing Working Holiday in Australia and Canada! Tuesday, October 14th. Bring your lunch!

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

I am arranging to visit Reiner Fuellmich in prison in Germany as soon as possible. The World must not forget Reiner, he is a political prisoner, a good man and my friend.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

He Studied 10,000 of His Own Patients, Found a 400% Increase in Childhood Illnesses Linked to Vaccines, and Lost His License for Telling the Truth

Stanford's Prof. Annelise Barron reveals the story of Dr. Paul Thomas, an Oregon pediatrician who believed in informed choice. He typically recommended a conservative, Danish-style vaccine schedule (≈17 shots by age 5) instead of the full CDC schedule, but honored parents' decisions for any path, including zero vaccines.

Dr. Thomas then did what more should: he looked at the real-world data. He analyzed thousands of children born into his practice, tracking diagnoses before age five. His study compared health outcomes—from ear infections and allergic rhinitis to ADHD—between his largely partially vaccinated/selectively vaccinated patients and the completely unvaccinated cohort.

The findings were unequivocal and alarming. The vaccinated children had a 4x higher risk of a wide range of health issues.

For publishing this objective, practice-based data, the system made an example of him. His medical license was revoked. His paper was retracted. He was professionally destroyed for telling an inconvenient truth.

This case is about more than vaccines. It's about the suppression of scientific inquiry and the silencing of a doctor who simply reported what he found in his own patient population. As Prof. Barron states, this was "real data" that should have been headline news, prompting a serious scientific discussion. Instead, it was buried.

When we silence messengers for their data, we are not protecting public health—we are protecting a narrative. The truth has a cost, and Dr. Paul Thomas paid it.

[Stuart Helmer @stuarthelmer]

OMG

Just watching the brilliant Lucy Letby documentary on @ITVX.

She's been absolutely stitched up

[Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108]

Japanese MP Haraguchi has a deeply personal reason for demanding the mRNA shots be banned.

They found the spike protein in the cancer cells of his malignant lymphoma.

There must be a reckoning!!

[Christopher Talbot @Lord_Talbot64]

Despite close to 3 million signatures already on the No to Digital ID petition the government has responded that it intends to go ahead with it anyway. Can there be any doubt now we live in a dictatorship? Your freedom is at risk.