Clare Slattery

Comms for @ChuckGrassley and @SenJudiciaryGOP | @marcorubio alum | Midwest native, @UofDallas grad, and whole milk enthusiast

[Mike Fragoso @mike_frags]

Hero

[Flappr @flapprdotnet]

"The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die.”

- George Washington, July 2, 1776

[Charles Correll III @_CharlesCorrell]

D.C. Liberals will look you dead in the face and say B-2 flyovers on Fourth of July Weekend are psychological warfare, but teen takeovers on a random Wednesday are just part of living in a city.

[Sen. Grassley Press @GrassleyPress]

"If you could describe America in one word, what would it be?"

Hear what Sen. @ChuckGrassley shared with Iowans in Monona during his #99countymeetings.

[Comfortably Smug @ComfortablySmug]

LFG Chuck Grassley

[Congresswoman Kat Cammack @RepKatCammack]

https://t.co/td2GexJygh

[Chuck Grassley @ChuckGrassley]

@SenJohnKennedy Kennedy’s got the right tool (manure fork) to clean up Washington

[Ben Brody @BenBrodyDC]

White House endorses a bipartisan bill to deal with "sextortion" of kids, @SenJudiciaryGOP announces. The committee advanced the James T. Woods Act to the floor in Feb. @RepLaurelLee's House version passed the month before

[Clare Slattery @clare_slatts]

On top of passing historic border security funding, America's favorite farmer @ChuckGrassley spent the week teaching urban dwellers from Washington to Wall Street a thing or two about ag policy.

Take a lesson from a man with dirt under his fingernails👇🌽🐷

[Matt Whitlock @MattWhitlock]

This is why nobody treats the House seriously.

You have the Secretary of State in front of Congress at a time of war

And this nepo baby Congresswoman is playing a dumb gotcha game about the 2020 election for TikTok clout.

[Craig Caplan @CraigCaplan]

Now-Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Grassley presided over the U.S. Senate 40 years ago today on Day 1 of live gavel-to-gavel Senate coverage on @cspan 2.

[Department of State @StateDept]

Happy Birthday, Mr. Secretary.

[Secretary Marco Rubio @SecRubio]

🇺🇸🇨🇺

[Marco Rubio @marcorubio]

Last month #China banned me

Today they sanctioned me

I don’t want to be paranoid but I am starting to think they don’t like me

https://t.co/Pk9yH1io3Z

[Clare Slattery @clare_slatts]

Democrats think advocating for whistleblowers is “sketchy” and a sign of “corruption.”

News flash: Grassley always fights for whistleblowers. Democrats, on the other hand, smear, defame and use them to try and score political points. Absolutely shameful.

[House Judiciary Dems @HouseJudiciary]

Senator Grassley’s current staff has also ordered DOJ to issue these payments. Which would be weird enough in terms of the separation of powers but it turns out the people representing the disgraced agents are themselves former Grassley staffers. That’s sketchy.

(6/7)

[House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @JudiciaryGOP]

Democrats continue to smear brave whistleblowers without any evidence.

And their friends in Big media are helping.

It's always about politics instead of the truth.

[Jason Foster @JsnFostr]

“Democrats said…” is not journalism.

There’s nothing improper about advocating for DOJ to remedy illegal whistleblower retaliation.

[Clare Slattery @clare_slatts]

This is a clickbait headline from a reporter who obviously didn’t read the plain language of the bill text.

The bill provides funding for Secret Service security enhancements — and explicitly prohibits funds from going to non-security “ballroom” elements.

[Clare Slattery @clare_slatts]

Actually, if you read the literal bill text, it does: $0 on the ballroom, Sam.

[Sam Stein @samstein]

The Ballroom was pitched as a project that would not cost taxpayer money. Now, Senate Judiciary Republicans are requesting $1 billion for security features related to it (how much of that $1 b on the ballroom, it doesn't say)

https://t.co/UR0O7GOEHR

[Clare Slattery @clare_slatts]

@BenjaminSWeiss @SenWhitehouse U.S. Attorneys are technically executive nominees, not judicial. And the Senate has confirmed 31 U.S. Attorneys already this Congress with 21 more Attorneys/Marshals expected in the next nominations package -- 5 of them have blue slips.