ClassE News

[ClassE News @classenews]

Nick Dargie is back with more from inside the Lindsay Clancy deliberation room and this detail is going to make your jaw drop.

The holdout juror, during deliberations, physically picked up an exercise band and a water bottle and MIMICKED how Lindsay killed her children in front of the entire jury.

It deeply disturbed every juror in that room.

Dargie also said the holdout was scrolling on his phone during deliberations and could not point to a single piece of testimony or evidence to back up his position. Not one.

After seven weeks of trial and seven days of deliberations, Dargie says the 911 call made by Patrick Clancy the night of the killings has haunted him ever since. He could not shake it.

And his verdict? Lindsay Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity. He is convinced of it.

He also believes if this case goes to retrial, a new jury will reach the exact same conclusion.

11 jurors believed she was mentally ill. One man mimicked the crime with a rubber band and a water bottle and called it deliberating.

🎥 Credit: GMA

Watch the full interview 👇

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨UPDATE: Former Colorado Forensics Analyst Handed 10-Year Prison Sentence for Manipulating DNA Results

​Yvonne “Missy” Woods, 66, was sentenced to 10 years in the Department of Corrections after pleading guilty to cybercrime, perjury, forgery, and attempting to influence a public servant. The former Colorado Bureau of Investigation analyst was immediately taken into custody following her hearing in Jefferson County.

​An investigation revealed that Woods altered or deleted crucial DNA values across a 15-year period spanning from 2008 to 2023. In multiple instances, she reported finding no male DNA despite its presence in the samples. Prosecutors confirmed that her deliberate misconduct compromised more than 1,000 cases, delivering a major blow to the state's criminal justice system and forensic reliability.

Yvonne “Missy” Woods was sentenced on Tuesday, September 8, 2026.

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨Defense Attorney Anticipates Charges Will Be Dropped for Gary Sr. After Incompetency Ruling
​Gary Sr. has been deemed incompetent to stand trial, according to his defense attorney.

With the court determining he is non-restorable, his legal team anticipates that all pending charges will soon be dismissed.

​While state authorities have the option to transfer him to a specialized care facility, his attorney noted that such a move is unnecessary, stating that Gary Sr. is currently "where he needs to be."

​With Gary Sr.’s legal proceedings drawing to a close, his attorney is shifting focus to his defense representation of Brandon Henderson.

​📸 Credit / Source: Doral Chenoweth / Columbus Dispatch
​#siders #ohio #vintoncounty

I apologize for the audio, the court audio is not the best.

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨DNA Analyst Tied to JonBenét Ramsey Case Gets 10 Years for Falsifying Evidence

[ClassE News @classenews]

A fifth Lindsay Clancy juror is now speaking out and this one hits different.

Nick Dargie, one of only TWO men who voted not guilty, sat down exclusively with ABC News and said he was devastated he could not set Lindsay Clancy free.

On the holdout, Dargie was direct:

"There were several times we would ask him to show us evidence or describe a witness testimony that helped prove what he was saying. And he couldn't. There was not a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was."

That is why the jury sent the note to the judge.

Dargie made clear there is nothing wrong with a holdout who has a genuine opposing view backed by evidence. That is the justice system working. But a holdout who cannot point to a single piece of evidence or a single witness to support their position?

That is something else entirely.

11 jurors. No evidence to counter. One man. One outcome.

🎥 Credit: Curtis Houck

[ClassE News @classenews]

🚨 The full juror interview is here and it is unlike anything we have heard yet from inside that deliberation room.

Paula Devlin, Roni Carlson, and Kellie Farina sat down with NBC10 Boston's Sue O'Connell and held nothing back.

On the medical system: All three believe the system failed Lindsay long before that night. They left this trial more aware of postpartum psychosis than they ever expected to be and they want the public to be too.

On the prosecution: They found the state's approach harsh, cold, and lacking any compassion. They did not feel the prosecution came close to proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt given the overwhelming evidence of Lindsay's mental state.

On the defense: They appreciated that Reddington kept the focus on the medical and psychiatric evidence without unnecessary delays. The evidence was clear to them. Lindsay was in the grip of severe mental illness.

On the emotional toll: These three jurors formed a bond just to survive the trauma of what they saw and heard inside that courtroom. They leaned on each other through the most heated moments of deliberations.

On the holdout: He could not separate his moral judgment from the legal standard of reasonable doubt. That is not what a juror is there to do. They struggled with that for days.

On the jury system: Despite everything they went through they came out still believing in it. They took their civic duty seriously from day one and never wavered.

On what they want for Lindsay: Not a retrial. They want her to get the mental health care she needs.

🎥 Credit: NBC10 Boston

Watch the full interview 👇

[ClassE News @classenews]

🧑🏻‍⚖️ More from Kevin Reddington and this part of the interview is the most personal yet.

On Patrick Clancy: Lindsay is fully aware of the social media conspiracy theories targeting her husband. She does not agree with any of it. Reddington says she believes Patrick has been unfairly targeted and his life has been turned into a nightmare he does not deserve.

On Lindsay herself: Every single visitor who goes to see her at Tewksbury comes back saying the same thing. She asks about everyone else. The judge. The DA. She shows no anger toward the people who prosecuted her. And every single day she tells the people around her: "I want my babies."

On who she was before: A beloved labor and delivery nurse. An amazing mother. Reddington places the blame for what happened squarely on the prescribing doctor and says postpartum psychosis combined with those medications is what caused the atrocious act.

On Trump and the DA: Reddington said he does not care who pressures DA Tim Cruz. "I would invoke Mahatma Gandhi if I thought it would help." He believes the prosecution of Lindsay Clancy is not righteous and he will seek help from anyone and everyone available to resolve this case.

On the holdout juror speaking out: He has zero interest in hearing from them. His job was to present the evidence. The jury made their decision. That is all.

🎥 Credit : NBC 10 WJAR

Watch the full interview 👇

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨Kevin Reddington, the defense attorney for Lindsay Clancy, stated to NBC News anchor Laura Jarrett that Patrick Clancy "did not deserve" the ordeal he has endured. Reddington added that Lindsay "certainly does not agree" with the various theories about him being shared on social media.

🎥NBC

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨Kevin Reddington, defense attorney for Lindsay Clancy, announced Wednesday that he plans to file a motion to dismiss the case against his client during a status hearing scheduled for Sept. 29.

​The decision comes after Reddington spoke with several jurors from the highly publicized murder trial, which ended in a mistrial on Sept. 4 when the jury remained hopelessly deadlocked following more than seven days of deliberations.

#LindsayClancy

🎥Credit / Source CBS

[ClassE News @classenews]

Lindsay Clancy's attorney Kevin Reddington just sat down with CBS Mornings and dropped several major updates.

On the holdout juror: Reddington says he would defend anyone's right to be a holdout for a month. But once the foreperson confirmed in writing that the holdout had reasonable doubt and was still refusing to follow the judge's instructions on the law, that is when he had a problem.

On a motion to dismiss: He is filing a double jeopardy motion on September 29th arguing there was no manifest necessity to declare a mistrial. If he wins that motion, Lindsay cannot be retried. Period.

On a plea deal: He says it is entirely up to DA Tim Cruz. Options on the table include reducing the charge to second degree murder, a jury waived trial, or a lower charge with a mental health component. But Reddington was crystal clear: "I'm not going to ever agree that this young lady do a day in jail."

On President Trump: Reddington said if he could reach out to the King of England for help he would. He confirmed he has NOT heard from the White House but is hoping Trump calls DA Cruz directly.

On the police investigation: The single biggest failure? A cup with residue that everyone believes was crushed pills was never seized, never analyzed, never sent to a crime lab. Nobody bothered.

On how Lindsay is doing: Not well. She is disappointed and sad. She is receiving psychiatric treatment at Tewksbury.

On another trial: "Oh Lord no. Another 6 weeks and putting her through that? No."

📽️ Credit: CBS Morning News

Watch the full interview 👇

[ClassE News @classenews]

😱 BREAKING: Juror No. 5 from the Lindsay Clancy trial just broke their silence with WBZ-TV and their words are powerful.

"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt. The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it.' There was too much gray area."

On Lindsay's mental state:

"This is a woman who was not mentally healthy. She was someone who was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis. I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn't see her way out."

On the holdout juror:

The 11 to 1 split created so much tension that Reddington filed an emergency petition to have the holdout REMOVED for allegedly refusing to apply the legal standard on reasonable doubt. The judge denied it.

Juror No. 5 made clear: if you acknowledge reasonable doubt exists and still vote to convict, you are violating the Constitution.

"To not follow that reasonable doubt and to acknowledge that it's there, you morally and legally cannot convict somebody for that."

The DA has not confirmed whether they will retry the case. A status hearing is set for September 29.

🎥 Credit / Source: WBZ-TV

Watch the full interview 👇

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨"Too Much Gray Area": Juror Breaks Silence After Mistrial Declared in Lindsay Clancy Case

​Following the declaration of a mistrial in the high-profile murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, a member of the jury has come forward to detail the deadlock that left 12 jurors unable to reach a consensus after more than 38 hours of deliberation.

​Speaking anonymously with WBZ-TV, Juror No. 5 shed light on the heavy atmosphere inside the jury room and why the prosecution’s case failed to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for every panelist.

​Key Takeaways from Juror No. 5
​Lack of Conclusive Proof: Despite initial inclinations toward a guilty finding, Juror No. 5 stated that the prosecution failed to deliver a definitive "smoking gun" regarding criminal responsibility.

​Severe Mental Health Crisis: The juror noted the panel struggled with evidence surrounding Clancy’s mental state, recognizing a woman deeply entrenched in a psychiatric crisis.

​Tensions Over the Holdout: The 11–1 split created high friction during deliberations. Defense attorneys even filed an emergency petition seeking to remove the single holdout juror for allegedly failing to apply legal standards on reasonable doubt.

​Chilling Evidence: Unreleased court evidence, specifically the emotional 911 call placed by Patrick Clancy, left a lasting mark on jurors and forcefully dispelled online conspiracy theories surrounding his involvement.

​Inside the Deliberation Room
​"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt. The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun.

There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it. There was too much gray area."
​
Juror No. 5
​Reflecting on the psychological evidence presented during the weeks-long trial, the juror added:

​"This is a woman who was not mentally healthy. She was someone who was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis... I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn't see her way out."

​Notes sent from the jury foreperson to Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan revealed that the impasse stemmed from a single holdout.

While the majority attempted to reason with the individual, Clancy's defense team argued that the holdout was violating constitutional guidelines by ignoring instructions on reasonable doubt.

​Juror No. 5 emphasized that jurors are bound by duty to uphold standard burden-of-proof requirements:

​"To not follow that reasonable doubt and to acknowledge that it's there, you morally and legally cannot convict somebody for that... Essentially, that is what we were there as a jury to do is to uphold that Constitution and give someone a fair trial of their peers."

​What's Next for the Case?
​With the court officially discharging the jury, the legal process resets.

The Plymouth County District Attorney's Office has not yet confirmed whether it will seek a retrial, while a status hearing has been scheduled for September 29 to determine the next procedural steps.

​#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Massachusetts #TrueCrime #BreakingNews

🎥Credit / Source WBZ-TV

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨Inside the Deliberation Room: 3 Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Silence in New Interview

​Three women who served on the Lindsay Clancy murder trial jury have spoken out in an exclusive interview with NBC10 Boston's Sue O'Connell following the case ending in a mistrial last week.

​Among those speaking out is the jury foreperson, who previously sent the note to the court expressing concern over a holdout juror who acknowledged reasonable doubt but refused to agree to a verdict.

​The Foreperson's Perspective: The foreperson recounted the pivotal moment inside the deliberation room when progress seemed imminent, stating, "He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited".

​The jurors offered direct insight into the internal dynamic and the specific impasse regarding the holdout juror that ultimately resulted in the mistrial.

🎥Credit/Source: NBC Boston10

[Amy Leigh @IAmyLeigh]

🚨Following the recent mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, several members of the jury panel including the foreperson have come forward to share their accounts of the tense deliberations inside Plymouth Superior Court.

​Key Details from Deliberations
​The 11–1 Split: Panel members confirmed the jury was deadlocked 11 to 1. Jurors described significant friction surrounding a single holdout who ultimately prevented a unanimous verdict.

​Disagreements Over Legal Standards: According to the foreperson, the holdout juror acknowledged during discussions that there was reasonable doubt regarding Clancy's mental state.

However, the juror was unwilling to officially sign off on a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.

​Doubt and Personal Convictions:

Another juror noted that members entered the jury room with strong convictions from the start.

While some initially leaned toward criminal responsibility, the trial exposed substantial gray areas regarding Clancy’s severe mental health crisis at the time of the events.

Deliberations spanned seven days and included multiple notes sent to Judge William Sullivan indicating an impasse. Tensions grew as the panel realized neither side was able to sway the other.

​The case remains unresolved, with a status hearing regarding a potential retrial scheduled for late September 2026.

🎥Credit/Source NBC Boston10

​#LindsayClancy
​#LindsayClancyTrial

[ClassE News @classenews]

RT @IAmyLeigh: 🚨Breakthrough revelations emerge from the Lindsay Clancy trial as jurors break their silence following the recent mistrial d…

[ClassE News @classenews]

👀 The Lindsay Clancy jurors just gave us a full look inside that deliberation room and it is a lot to take in.

Here is what they said:

All 11 agreed Lindsay was NOT criminally responsible. They said she loved her children. She begged for help and got help. Not a single witness, even for the prosecution, had one bad word to say about her. They believe she snapped and had no idea what she was doing was wrong.

The 911 call was so disturbing that jurors were crying in the jury room. Others had to wear earplugs and play music because they literally could not bear to hear it again.

All 18 original jurors stayed for the entire five weeks. Every single one. They took their civic duty seriously even when the evidence was destroying them emotionally.

Deliberations were tense. There was name calling. But they supported each other through it.

And then there was the one holdout.

Arrogant. Refused to listen. Dismissed the toxicology report even after nurses on the panel walked him through it. Admitted he had reasonable doubt and watched the foreperson fill out and sign all three not guilty forms.

Then said he still would not vote to acquit.

They also said the prosecution was excessively harsh. And Reddington? They called him arrogant but said he was entertaining and deeply compassionate toward Lindsay.

11 people believed this woman was sick, not evil.

One man decided that was not enough.

📽️: NBC 10 Boston

Watch the full interview 👇

[Surviving The Survivor Podcast @PodcastSTS]

#LindsayClancy jurors on holdout:

“He admitted he had reasonable doubt.”

What do you all think?

[ClassE News @classenews]

🚨The Lindsay Clancy jurors are speaking out and what they're saying about how they felt about Lindsay herself is just as revealing as what they said about the holdout.

All three jurors who spoke to NBC10 Boston made clear they believed her.

One juror said there was simply "so much doubt" she could not reach a guilty verdict.

Another described the deliberations as exhausting, saying: "Every one of us in the hours of our frustration would get up and walk the room, because you just couldn't sit anymore."

The holdout juror, they say, was the only one who could not get past the images of what Lindsay did to her children. "He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children," one juror said.

But here's the thing. He admitted he had reasonable doubt. The foreperson said she started filling out the NOT GUILTY forms. Signed all three. Then he said: "But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity."

The nurses on the jury pushed him on the toxicology report. He wouldn't listen.

"He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said."

11 jurors believed Lindsay Clancy was out of her mind when she killed her children. One man decided that didn't matter.

📽️: NBC 10 Boston

Watch the full interview 👇

[ClassE News @classenews]

🚨 BREAKING: Three Lindsay Clancy jurors are now speaking out exclusively to NBC10 Boston after the mistrial.

Here's what we know so far:

It was 11 to 1. 11 jurors were ready to vote NOT GUILTY by reason of insanity. ONE man stood in the way.

The jury foreperson said the holdout juror actually ADMITTED he had reasonable doubt during deliberations. She said she was so excited she started filling out the verdict forms.

Then he changed course and refused to commit to a verdict.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington blasted him after the mistrial was declared:

"They know they were robbed by one man, for whatever his agenda was, who stole seven weeks of the life of these other jurors. I hope that guy can sleep well at night."

The jury's final note to the judge read: "It is with heavy heart we are still unable to come to a decision and will not be able to."

Lindsay Clancy was THIS CLOSE to walking out of that courtroom.

Now the DA has to decide whether to put her through an entire second trial.

📽️ : NBC10 Boston

Watch the full juror interview 👇