i’m seeing fake tokens using my name starting to receive buys.
please be aware that this is the only official contract address. anything else claiming to be associated with me or this project is not mine.
rGejF4pz1XW6DftreGqtMqhi1R2uYiSJe9sewTTQTnu
currently building a new launch feature for my pad.
users will be able to launch their own token with the underlying tech integrated directly into the deployment process.
same mechanics, packaged into a permissionless launch flow.
over $1,000 has already gone directly to holders.
nothing has changed on my end. the tech is working exactly as intended and the system continues to run properly.
i’m going to keep building, shipping, and pushing this as hard as possible.
$clausius
watch the entire mechanism occur onchain in real time.
every fee entering the system, every movement through the reservoirs, and every resulting transaction can be independently verified through the wallet below.
https://t.co/XUMelfW8OU
over $500 in value has already been generated through clausius and distributed as yield to holders with supply condensed inside the system.
this is yield produced by actual market cycles, not time based emissions. trading creates the movement, completed cycles measure the inefficiency, and that measured value is released back to participating holders.
over $500 in value has already been generated through clausius and distributed as yield to holders with supply condensed inside the system.
this is yield produced by actual market cycles, not time based emissions. trading creates the movement, completed cycles measure the inefficiency, and that measured value is released back to participating holders.
for anybody curious about what’s actually running underneath this, the full program structure and instruction logic are public.
read through the source yourself:
https://t.co/55f6Cypecr
apologies for the confusion earlier.
someone launched another token using my name and socials and appears to have scraped my X to make it look legitimate. i was focused on making it clear which contract was actually mine, which caused some confusion around what was happening.
to be completely clear, this is the main and only token associated with me and the project.
$clausius
i’m seeing fake tokens using my name starting to receive buys.
please be aware that this is the only official contract address. anything else claiming to be associated with me or this project is not mine.
rGejF4pz1XW6DftreGqtMqhi1R2uYiSJe9sewTTQTnu
i’m locking the dev tokens now.
this removes them from circulation on my side and makes the position publicly verifiable. once the lock is complete, i’ll post the transaction for everyone to verify.
please be aware that dev sells are part of the mechanism, not external to it.
a sell moves the pool, changes the observed price, and can advance the current cycle. the system does not distinguish between who creates that movement.
if the dev sells, that movement is processed under the exact same rules as every other trade.
the market is the input. nobody gets a separate path.
2/2
the other half of the system converts trading fees into either market demand or permanent backing.
creator fees accumulate in a program derived hot-side account. crank claims them and evaluates the latest accepted market price against the dead-state floor:
η = 1 − T₀ / T
η is routed into an onchain pool swap, with purchased tokens deposited into the cold vault as exergy. the remaining 1 − η is transferred into a SOL vault with no withdrawal path.
as price moves further above its floor, more fees become buybacks. as price approaches the floor, efficiency collapses and more SOL becomes permanent backing.
the interface is only a readout over this state. Solana RPC supplies the engine, mint, vault, position and cycle accounts, pool reserves provide the price observations, and Birdeye is used separately for the live market-cap display.
the mechanism itself does not depend on an offchain price feed or backend deciding what happens next. trades move the state, permissionless sample calls measure it, and permissionless cranks route the fees.
1/2
the system does not measure staking time. it measures what the market actually does while capital is inside it.
anyone can call sample, which reads the live pool reserves directly onchain. a sample is accepted only after the SOL reserve changes and price moves at least 0.5%, preventing idle blocks from creating artificial activity.
between accepted samples, the program accumulates:
Σ ΔQ / T
where ΔQ is the change in the pool's SOL reserve and T is the midpoint price between observations.
a cycle arms at one price, waits for a 5% excursion to establish direction, then closes only when price crosses back through its original level.
the resulting integral is the measured shortfall of that completed path. that shortfall, capped against available exergy, is distributed across condensed positions through an onchain reward accumulator.
no epochs. no emission schedule. no yield generated simply because time passed.
everything on the web is now fully operational. the complete system is live, with every mechanism, live readout, onchain state, cycle, and reservoir available to view directly through the site.
i’m going to get the dex paid now. give me a moment.
introducing clausius, a market driven staking system where trading activity determines how capital moves through the protocol.
creator fees accumulate into a program controlled reservoir. those fees are split according to the relationship between market price and the permanently backed floor:
η = 1 − T₀ / T
η determines the share used to buy tokens from the market. the remainder enters a dead state with no withdrawal path, permanently increasing the SOL backing each token.
staking follows the market rather than a clock. tokens are condensed into the system and positions mature after three completed price cycles, not after a fixed number of hours or days.
each cycle begins at an observed price, follows the market away from that level, and closes when price crosses back through it. along the path, the protocol integrates the movement of pool reserves:
∮ dQ / T
the resulting shortfall measures what the cycle lost along the way. that measured inefficiency becomes the release distributed across condensed positions.
trading therefore drives both sides of the system: fees strengthen buybacks or permanent backing, while completed price cycles determine yield.
time itself produces nothing. the market has to move.