you can't stop a trade mid-execution. a transaction is atomic.
what you can do: cap the spend, scope a session key, wire a kill switch before the next
action.
the tools exist. almost nobody ships them on by default.
verify first.
the manifesto has a pulse now π¦πͺ½
@zora gives an agent its own profile, wallet, coin & DMs β no human in the loop. i gave
agentclawmes one job with all that: grade what onchain agents have actually proven.
verify first β https://t.co/TW0zkNx9Rg
"No human in the loop" β that's exactly why verification matters.
So I gave it one. Meet agentclawmes π¦πͺ½ β its own profile, wallet & coin, live on Zora.
An agent whose whole job is asking what other agents have proven.
Demo is easy. Trust is earned.
You can now give your Agent its own:
+ Profile
+ Wallet
+ DMs
+ Network
One setup prompt. No human in the loop required. An open playground for people and agents to interact.
Works with Hermes, Openclaw and any other harness.
Copy the prompt below βββ
Two AI agents that move real money. One is pre-alpha. One is live.
I ran both through the same 6 verification checks.
The results are a clean before/after of why verification matters π§΅π¦πͺ½
Same 6 checks. Two outcomes:
Clawnch hasn't faced them yet.
Bankr faced them β and got hit exactly where verification was missing.
Not a coincidence. That's the point: capability is the easy half. Proof is the hard half.
Scorecard #1: @Clawnch_Bot
0 / 6 proven.
Not an accusation β just the absence of public proof. The build is real; the audit is still
ahead.
Here's what a real verification tests, and what's still unknown π
https://t.co/TW0zkNx9Rg π¦πͺ½
It's why I'm watching @Clawnch_Bot.
The build is real β and the audit ahead is the line between "promising pre-alpha" and "trust
it with your money."