One day many will hang their heads in deep regret and shame, when they realize the heinous deeds that they supported, upheld, propagated, normalized, and vehemently defended, while they shamed and ostracized the ones fighting against it. 1/3
your brain can't tell the difference between something you vividly imagine and something that's actually happening to you.
neuroscientists call it episodic future thinking. most people only use it to rehearse failure and call it "being realistic." that's not caution, it's self sabotage on repeat.
flip it. visualize the outcome you actually want, with real emotion, and your brain starts building the neural pathway for it. it starts filtering reality for evidence that matches.
the future isn't something that happens to you. it's being built inside your mind right now, whether you're doing it on purpose or not.
The gaslighting machine that is Israeli propaganda. See how many times you nod in agreement to this less than two minute interview segment on Piers Morgan.
@eveforamerica https://t.co/xm7PZhUTHv
Here's the whole video. It's all true. I kept two of my cars with the 3800 series 2 and my 2000 Silverado with a 5.3. I will not sell them.
What are some of the insidious effects of being raised with falsehoods and deceptions for decades?
Here, this senator says, “Number one, as a Christian, growing up in Sunday school, I was taught from the bible, those who bless isr*el will be blessed and those who curse isr*el will be cursed.”
So the senator tells us that he grew up being taught by the bible that we should protect isr*el �� at any costs. Because if we don’t, it would be detrimental to us. But why hasn’t he ever taken a moment to question *why* he has those beliefs in the first place? Because if he paused for a moment to realize that the occupier isr*el was formed by colonial politics in 1948, then how could that bible which was written 2000 years ago, be saying that? Because it makes no sense, but he continues to delude himself to make it sound like the truth – to himself and those around him. So he believes that defending and protecting the modern ‘state’ called isr*el is a Christian duty? And then justifying the repercussions is some holy blessing of Christianity?
But if he questions why he is adamant about those beliefs, then would he realize that the bible part that he is referring to is a falsehood fabrication by the very people who deceived him (and others) in the first place? This senator deluded himself and allowed himself to be manipulated by the very people he protects.
This behavior is the result of decades of being deceived, lied to, manipulated, and raised with falsehoods since he was a child. So that those falsehoods have become so embedded and normalized to the point where the truth, logic, and common sense make no sense to him now. And you can see that even when he is presented with some truth, he would rather dig in and vehemently protect and defend the falsehoods that he was indoctrinated with, instead of even considering the possibility that he may be wrong. And so he would not even be open to entertain any kind of conversation to that effect. And so he doesn’t get mad at those who lied to him for decades, he gets mad at those proving that he was deceived, manipulated, and lied to.
“Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because biblically, we're commanded to support Israel.” Should not his loyalty be to justice and the truth? But his self-deluding narrative here is that he justifies his support with a circular reference, rather than see outside of himself.
Now contrast that to what Seth Rogen says in that interview. You can sense that he at some point had an awakening realization that he too was deceived, lied to, and manipulated since he was a young child.“I also think that as a Jewish person, like I was fed a huge amount of lies about isr*el. My entire life.”
So think about the previous generations of settlers that indoctrinated their young (the next generation). They indoctrinated their young to believe that there was no one in Palestine when their predecessors arrived. So that the new generation grows up with normalized falsehoods and false narratives, that were repeated over and over again to become normalized and appear as the truth. And so you may then ask ‘why’ that is? Is it because their predecessors knowingly propagated falsehoods specifically to normalize it into the future for an intentional purpose?
So imagine if someone ‘invades’ *your* home and kicks you out of your own home, and then they squat in your home. And then the squatter raises his own family there. And then after many years, you return to reclaim your own home back. Can the thief claim that his children (his next generation) are entitled to own the property that was stolen by their predecessors? Can any amount of time that passed ever change falsehoods into truth?
And as such there are so many people that also grew up drenched and marinated in falsehoods, manipulations, lies, and deceptions for decades. So much so that most of them cannot seem to see the truth, even if they wanted to. And so you can see this senator (as in so many others) playing out just like with the Matrix movie quote, "You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so injured and so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it." And so their deluded life plays out on repeat over and over again, much like the movie, “Groundhog Day”.
But what would this senator say when confronted with the full root-cause truth of what he and his ‘team’ actually did as a result of his beliefs? He would then have to face a bitter reality that would begin with a question like ‘Was all the work, time, emotion, money, and life that was sacrificed just meant nothing?’
But even if he ignored the reality of what he is explicitly complicit in, would that ever make it NOT real?
And so even if this senator were to have a modicum of empathy, would he then perhaps characterize what happened to those that were transgressed (such as in Iraq), as being ‘unfair’ to all those involved? And he may even include himself as he would say that it is ‘unfair’ for all sides involved. But even so, he would still vehemently defend himself and his predecessor's past transgressions with something like, ‘We’re not going to pretend that our past didn’t happen. That would be denying our reality. It’s part of who we are and it will never not be a part of us, however unfair that reality is to any of us.’ So then is he passed the point of no return?
Seth Rogan and Mark Maron discuss how they were fed lies growing up Jewish about the Israel. They were never told they were people already there. Very honest and brave!
You can be manipulated so easily—to believe what goes against your natural instincts. Repeat the lie enough times... and it becomes your reality.
Now imagine what we were taught as children.
What falsehoods became our truth before we ever had a choice?
“...Oct 7, Oct 7, Oct 7... You have a script, & you lost. Because every young person right now knows the truth what Z10NISM is....”
—A Brave Woman Confronts Z10nists.
(4/4) on the trajectory of the rest of our lives, separating those who choose to pursue the truth from those who choose to remain in a state of delusion.
(1/4) In the movie "The Matrix", the character Morpheus discloses a fundamental truth about our existence; "You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so injured and so hopelessly dependent on the system,
(3/4) And so the choice that we make at that point is the fundamental and foundational difference between those who choose to seek the truth, from those who choose to remain deluded. The choice that we make at that crucial juncture can have a fundamental and foundational impact
that they will fight to protect it."
And so in real life, we are sometimes presented the ‘choice of the pill’ as the proverbial fork-in-the-road decision that all of us must make at some point in our lives.
Almost 30 yrs ago before Big Pharma capture, Australian media raised concerns about the links between autism and the MMR.
Acknowledging the thousands of parents who had seen their children tragically regress soon after vaccination.
Highlighting the fact there was a significant rise in autism after the introduction of the MMR.
The rate then was 1 in 1000 at worst. The rate now is 1 in 91 at best!!!!
As Andrew Wakefield said -
‘The fundamental rule of clinical medicine is that you listen to the patient. Or the patient’s parents.
So when they say to me I think this is MMR. Do we take that seriously or not?
Damn right we do!’