Psychology of guilt and your internal conscience reacting to moral misalignment:
Narrated by An-Nawas: The Prophet ﷺ said: "Sin is that which wavers in your soul and you dislike that people should find out."
— Sahih Muslim 2553 (Sahih)
The Prophet ﷺ said:
"If a servant commits a sin, a black spot is cast into his heart. If he repents, it is polished; but if he continues, it increases."
— At-Tirmidhi, No. 3334 (Hasan)
psychology of anxiety and the exhausting illusion of trying to control future variables:
Ibn al-Uthaymeen said:
"Anxiety does not alter destiny, but it destroys the peace of the present moment."
— Sharh Riyad as-Salihin
@sadiq786_s@hasnain_313_ Watching rafida panic-backtrack to "I was just asking questions" after getting intellectually obliterated is hilarious.
Keep crying 🤡
@sadiq786_s@hasnain_313_ Imagine invoking the Hujjah in one tweet, then throwing a fit in the next because you got mathematically and historically humiliated. Your "scholarship" is an absolute joke, your calendar logic is broken, and your manners are non-existent. Clown behaviour.
@sadiq786_s@hasnain_313_ you just destroyed the posts primary argument. The entire original post relies on Leviticus 23, which explicitly commands a fast on the SEVENTH month. You just argued Muharram conformed to the NINTH month. You literally just debunked the "prophecy."
@hasnain_313_@sadiq786_s It is not restlessness, but care for the integrity of religious discourse. When a claim relies on fabricated Abjad and a calendar system banned by the Quran, it must be corrected. The truth stands clear from error.
@hasnain_313_@sadiq786_s True guidance belongs to Allah alone, but its prerequisite is humility before the truth. When presented with clear Quranic verses (9:37) and objective facts, the dignified path is reflection, not condescension. May Allah grant us sincerity above the desire to win.
@sadiq786_s@hasnain_313_ Using pre-Islamic Nasi' to force Muharram into Sept :/
Karbala was 61 AH, 50 years AFTER Islam strictly banned Nasi' in the Quran 9:37. By then, the calendar was purely lunar. Your defense relies on a pagan system the Quran calls an increase in disbelief. هدانا الله وإياكم
@hasnain_313_ Hiding behind "Husayn's RA martyrdom stands independent" is a cop-out. No one is questioning Karbala. I am questioning your fake math, broken astronomy, and hijacked scriptures. Propping up Ahl al-Bayt with forged evidence is the real embarrassment here. 4/4
@hasnain_313_ Throwing out "Preterist or Futurist" schools doesn't save you. Preterists map 666 to Nero. Futurists say he hasn't arrived. Literally ZERO historical or biblical schools map a 1st-century Greek cryptogram onto a 7th-century Umayyad Caliph. Laughable literally 3/4
@hasnain_313_ Your calendar point fails. Leviticus was post-Exodus, so "7th month" strictly means Tishrei. More importantly the Islamic calendar is purely lunar the Hebrew calendar is lunisolar. A permanent structural alignment between them is an astronomical impossibility. 2/4
@hasnain_313_ Dropping "Mashriqi vs Maghribi Abjad" is a massive bluff. The only letters that change between those systems are ص، ض، س، ظ، غ، ش. Not a SINGLE one of those is in عبد الملك بن مروان. It adds up to 546 in BOTH systems. You literally fabricated 666. 1/4
@hasnain_313_ The 666 in Revelation 13 uses 1st century Hebrew/Greek gematria, which historians universally agree points to Nero Caesar (Neron Qesar = 666). In Arabic Abjad, Abdul Malik ibn Marwan (عبد الملك بن مروان) adds up to 546, not 666. You literally fabricated the math.
@hasnain_313_ Leviticus 23:27 explicitly states this is the 10th day of the seventh month (Tishrei) for Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement). Muharram is the first month of the Islamic calendar. Trying to link the Hebrew calendar to Karbala by ignoring the text is wild confirmation bias.
@amaradunqas@LifeEnjoya4L How can you claim that summary sentence is a validation of existence when Ibn Kathir explicitly states in the same book that this 12th Imam "does not exist at all" (ليس بموجود بالكلية)? Which one reflects his actual belief: his direct theological verdicts, or a casual transition?