There’s no way to tell based on this tool how the author used AI. If they wrote the whole thing, then asked Claude to a) translate, b) check for grammar, c) change names, etc., the entire thing will still show up as being generated by Claude. +
I don’t use LLMs in my daily life/for creative writing but I’ve been required to use it in grad school and I can’t imagine them being used genuinely for anything other than pointing out minor grammatical errors in long piece/articles, but even then I just correct them myself
i can’t imagine a viewer watching the scene where she begs him to kill her and coming out with the takeaway that he isn’t selfish or cruel in knowing what he’s doing to her and still selfishly caring more about his own wants / that you’re not meant to empathize with her
b/c the point is not to show “bear’s true evilness”, he’s not especially worse than everybody else, it’s about how easily *Normal People* (particularly men) can slip into thoughtless cruelty in pursuit of their wants and desires (and continue to do so even after realizing)
you cannot convince me that this film was as empathetic to nikki as it needed to be. her entire character is a caricature of the 'bpd girlfriend' without ever comitting hard enough to bear's true evilness at allowing her to completely lose autonomy
I excuse it tho bc Alec lightwood is one of the sexiest gay men on tv and magnus/alec getting 200x more material in the show than they got in the books was for the people.
everybody in the replies talking about how matt is there for no reason now dkmdmfmf if your friend starts yelling F*G and ur first response is “im on facebook live” you know damn well that is a regular occurrence kdjdkfjjf
pisses me off: when media ends saying every character went on to accomplish great things, and no one has a story like "got addicted to fentanyl" "died the next month in a car accident" "moved to the city to pursue his dream, but failed to take off" "got stuck in dead-end career"
this is w/o even getting to the other aspect of what these jokes have done where now stan twt users will just post straight-up nazi rhetoric and excuse it as *spiritually israeli* jokes. totally meaningless and ignorant of reality and history
why are half the quotes of this is actually braindead. “it’s actually good because it keeps genocide part of casual discourse” do you really think making jokes about pop songs you don’t like is activism? what does it do besides make people desensitized to joking about it?
one day we really need to talk about modern mematic warfare and how the “tel and aviv” or “spiritually israeli” jokes use internet irony to desensitize the public to mass violence, laundering the language of apartheid and genocide into casual, everyday discourse.
the average tik tok user making these jokes is not thinking “this will help maintain public awareness of what the IDF is doing in gaza”, they’re thinking “haha funny joke” because a lot of you have meme-ified the murders of thousands and destruction of their lives
@ravenwing263 which imo would better explain stuff like last-minute betty/reggie (as a last-season return to betty/jughead would have had more in-show precedent). not that i was upset bc i was one of the few archie comics betty/reggie enjoyers for seasons. but it was quite random
I like how post-riverdale finale the complete fabrication “cole sprouse refused to kiss a man which is why jughead is only implied offscreen bisexual” became widely accepted as fact
@ravenwing263 hmm i agree reggie makes sense w/ s7 but imo the quad wasn’t intended to be more than a gag. tbh i’d assume the opposite? (jughead being written out of what would have been ‘core four’ plots in s7 rather than reggie being written out of a momentary gag in the finale)