And to top it all off let’s just say you’re being truthful about not paying for the Quality Inn interviews until 8/6, which I don’t believe you are because they wouldn’t have been included in ABCS bulk release because her cut off date was 8/5 when she paid the invoice for the bulk FOIA. However let’s just pretend you’re being truthful.
If this were true your issue should be with MPD not AD or ABCs and you should be requesting for a refund from MPD due to paying full price and then them releasing the interviews to someone else before you even paid for them as Julez even tried to explain to you in your meltdown post.
You shouldn’t be attacking a Creator for posting interviews that they were ASKED TO POST ON BEHALF OF SOMEONE ELSE BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO SUBMITTED THE FOIA RECEIVED 150+ FILES FROM MPD AND THEY ASKED AD TO POST THEM ON BEHALF OF THEM BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE THEIR OWN CHANNEL.
And let’s not forget you sure loved to go like and comment on AD’s other video releases and let’s not forget her response back to you when she found out that you originally paid the full price for the hotel interviews! Then you attacked her!
Bock bock 🐔
You keep saying people privately thanked you for “calling her out.” Funny — everyone who’s actually followed the records thinks you’re a chaotic mess who still doesn’t understand how FOIAs work.
Here’s what actually happened:
You submitted one FOIA on 5/24/2026 for both the Hayden surveillance and the Quality Inn interviews.
You got the Hayden footage weeks before your 7/18 post (the one where you claimed you already had it “several weeks ago”) and never released it.
Someone else later paid a small duplication fee and put it out.
You then paid the production cost for the hotel interviews and received them around that same mid-July window. You sat on them.
On 8/5 ABCS paid a duplication fee for all files that had already been released by MPD. The hotel interviews were in that batch of 150+ files. That’s how they ended up public.
You now want to claim MPD didn’t give you the hotel interviews until 8/6 when you supposedly paid. If that were true, those interviews would not have been included in ABCS’s 8/5 bulk release. The cutoff was 8/5. They were already produced and available.
That’s how it’s known you’re lying about the timeline.
Let’s talk about this too: Connor paid the full production price for the Martha Smith interview. Lana paid a duplication fee and released it first — before Connor even had the chance. Did Connor lose his mind and start a public crusade? No. Because what you’re doing isn’t normal.
Same thing with the Jack D. interviews from 11/21/22 and 11/22/22. Accomplished_Day got those after paying a duplication fee, which means someone out there paid full price for them first. They were never released. To this day no one even knows who originally had them. If AD never posted them, none of you would have ever heard those interviews — just like these Quality Inn ones.
The dates don’t care about your meltdown, your “receipts,” or who you think is a sock.
Cluck cluck.
Bock bock 🐔
You keep saying people privately thanked you for “calling her out.” Funny. Everyone who’s actually followed the communication thinks you’re a chaotic mess who still doesn’t understand how FOIAs work.
Here’s what actually happened:
You submitted one FOIA on 5/24/2026 for both the Hayden surveillance and the Quality Inn interviews.
You got the Hayden footage weeks before your 7/18 post (the one where you claimed you already had it “several weeks ago”) and never released it. Someone else later paid a small duplication fee, 4 weeks ago to be EXACT & RELEASED IT.
You then paid the production cost for the hotel interviews and received them around that same mid-July window, but you sat on them.
On 8/5 ABCS paid a duplication fee for all files that had already been released by MPD. The hotel interviews were in that batch of 150+ files. That’s how they ended up public.
You now want to claim MPD didn’t give you the hotel interviews until 8/6 when you supposedly paid. If that were true, those interviews would not have been included in ABCS’s 8/5 bulk release. The cutoff was 8/5. They were already produced and available.
That’s how it’s clear that you’re lying about the timeline. However if our assumption is wrong you should be taking this up with MPD and getting a refund as JULEZ tried explaining to you as well.
And let’s talk about this too: Connor paid the full production price for the Martha Smith interview. Lana paid a duplication fee and released it first — before Connor even had the chance. Did Connor lose his mind and start a public crusade? No. Because what you’re doing isn’t normal.
Same thing with the Jack D. interviews from 11/21/22 and 11/22/22.
Accomplished_Day got those after paying a duplication fee, which means someone out there paid full price for them first. They were never released. To this day no one even knows who originally had them. If AD never posted them, none of you would have ever heard those interviews just like these Quality Inn ones.
The dates don’t care about your meltdown, your “receipts,” or who you think is a sock.
Cluck cluck.
@KateArete released them before you did — especially when you sat on them for almost a month with no release.
Keep yelling “receipts” and “sock account” all you want. The dates don’t care.
Cluck cluck.
@KateArete released them before you did — especially when you sat on them for almost a month with no release. Keep yelling “receipts” and “sock account” all you want. The dates don’t care.
Cluck cluck.
@KateArete Bock bock 🐔 You don’t know how FOIAs work.
You requested both on 5/24. You claimed on 7/18 you already had the Hayden footage “several weeks ago.” The hotel interviews only hit the public after the 8/5 bulk release. End of story: you received these records a few weeks prior to
@KateArete Bock bock 🐔The receipts are louder than your https://t.co/TtEGdNh8wG FOIA’d the Hayden surveillance & the hotel interviews on 5/24/2026 in the same request.On 7/18/2026 you posted that you “already had the Hayden surveillance several weeks ago.”
MPD doesn’t sit on records for 3
@KateArete So you sat on it… and now you’re mad a newer creator had someone reach out to them who paid a dup fee for it and posted it before you. something’s not adding up