Clyde C.

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

有时候，确实是越看不懂的玩意越赚💵 PnL就不发了hhh

[SpaceX @SpaceX]

Starship achieved orbit on its first attempt and successfully delivered Starlink V3 satellites to space for the first time → https://t.co/LwJ4g6dNZ3

[小手川峰｜Feng 🐝 @memeking_888]

我觉得 e/acc 这种还真不好复制，不止是打钱，也符合当下世界 "AI降速论 Vs. e/acc加速主义"两种思潮的碰撞，有很大舆论流量潜力，昨晚在群里还聊到e/acc 来着🙂 #eacc

另外Beff @beffjezos 这人也挺懂币圈的，提到当初的 $SHIB (Shiba Inu)相当于是支持AI威胁论/控制AI发展（V神捐款给FLI（Future of Life Institute) ； 现在e/acc 正好是当初SHIB的对立面，叙事直接拔高了，两种对于AI/科技发展的理念又对应上这两个meme币。

而且Beff说要用e/acc产生的收益用于成立一个非盈利组织(原话是：'Gonna use this random windfall to make a legit e/acc RAND Corp.')，以跨学科的方式深入阐述 e/acc 的科学，并设立一个智库/政策咨询部门作为该研究所的一部分。

这个事件很可能引发科技圈广泛关注。重视吧

PS: 2021 年狗币爆发期间，SHIB 匿名项目方为了营销（打着“V神有一半代币”的旗号），未经同意将总量 50% 的 SHIB 代币直接打进了以太坊创始人 V 神（Vitalik Buterin）的钱包。

V 神的处理方式：V 神不想持有这些代币，决定将其变现捐出：一部分捐给了印度 COVID 救助基金（CryptoRelief）（也就是大家熟知的给印度机构捐款）。另一部分直接捐给了 FLI（Future of Life Institute）。

在2026年初，V神公开抱怨称，他当年捐款时FLI承诺的是做“学术研究与和平倡议”，但后来FLI拿这5亿美元摇身一变成了巨大的政治公关/政策敲门砖机构，天天去游说政府“限制open-sourceAI(开源AI)”。V神表示自己对FLI的发展方向感到非常遗憾和不认同。

另外有趣的是PM @Polymarket 也下场凑热闹：突发：𝕏 用户报告称，他们遭受了“财务 DDOS”攻击，通过 𝕏 货币未经请求地收到数万美元。 //指的应该就是Beff e/acc这个事件哈哈

[比特币橙子Trader @oragnes]

AMC CEO 怒喷 Robinhood，我看到的不是保护股东，而是老钱第一次发现自己管不住新钱了！

AMC CEO Adam Aron 要求 Robinhood 立刻停止交易 AMC 股票代币，理由很简单：

这不是 AMC 授权的股票，没有投票权，不受公司控制，还跑到泽西岛发行。他甚至把这东西形容成虚假市场，准备让律师研究怎么强制叫停。

但这件事最讽刺的地方是：

AMC 当年恰恰是靠 Reddit 散户、Meme 股、Robinhood 这一代新钱文化救活的。

现在同一批资金开始把股票搬到链上、24/7 交易、全球流通，Aron 第一反应却不是怎么接住这批人，而是“这东西我没批准，给我关掉”。

这就是典型的老钱思维：资产必须在我规定的交易所交易，股东必须进入我认可的股东名册，���场必须在我能控制的时间里开门，金融产品最好还得先征得发行人的祝福。

但 Crypto 的思维完全相反——只要一种资产有价格，就有人会把它拆成价格敞口、抵押品、永续、代币，再拿到全世界 24 小时交易。

Robinhood 这张 AMC 代币当然不是法律意义上的 AMC 股票，这一点 Aron 没说错。

但如果 Robinhood 真按 1:1 买入正股托底，那么链上每新增一美元 AMC 需求，背后理论上都可能对应一美元正股购买。

AMC 没被稀释，现有股东没少一票，反而多出了一条全球资金进入 AMC 价格敞口的通道。

所以 Aron 最让我不理解的，不是他提醒投资者这不是股票，而是他对一条新资本入口的本能敌意。

2021 年的 AMC 靠新钱把老金融打懵了一次。

2026 年，当新钱开始自己造交易所、自己造股票市场、自己造 24/7 资本市场时，AMC 的 CEO 却站到了门口说：

你们不能这么玩。

这TMD哪跟哪啊？

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Starbase Louisiana will ultimately have over a dozen launch towers, enabling more than 30 Starship flights per day and making it the biggest launch site on Earth!

SpaceX makes sci-fi real.

[Morin @TraderMorin]

$XPL

200d base forming

4th retest of the 0.11$ s/r level

Looking to play both perp and spot once we flip that level.

Eyes on the isolated swing highs for targets.

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

🐂真的来了woc（？

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

I'm my own quant type shii

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

Under the radar cooks, and more. Your fomo KOLs are my EL.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Full stack engineering

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Neuralink progress

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Every time you get a cancer biopsy, the lab makes a tissue slide that costs about $5. It shows the shape of your cells under a microscope, and every cancer patient already has one on file.

There’s a much fancier version of that test called multiplex immunofluorescence (basically a protein-level map showing which immune cells are near your tumor and what they’re doing). It costs thousands of dollars per sample, takes specialized equipment most hospitals don’t have, and barely scales. But it’s the kind of data oncologists need to figure out whether immunotherapy will actually work for you. Right now, only about 20 to 40% of cancer patients respond to immunotherapy, and one of the biggest reasons is that doctors can’t easily tell whether a tumor is “hot” (immune cells actively fighting it) or “cold” (immune system ignoring it).

Microsoft, Providence Health, and the University of Washington trained an AI to analyze the $5 slide and predict what the expensive test would show across 21 different protein markers. They called it GigaTIME, trained it on 40 million cells in which both the cheap slide and the expensive test coexisted, and then turned it loose on 14,256 real cancer patients across 51 hospitals in 7 US states.

The results landed in Cell, one of the most selective journals in biology. The model generated about 300,000 virtual protein maps covering 24 cancer types and 306 subtypes. It found 1,234 real, verified connections between immune cell behavior, genetic mutations, tumor staging, and patient survival that were previously invisible at this scale. When they tested it against a completely separate database of 10,200 cancer patients, the results matched up almost perfectly (0.88 out of 1.0 agreement).

Nature Methods named spatial proteomics (mapping where specific proteins sit inside your tissue) its Method of the Year in 2024, and specifically cited GigaTIME in a March 2026 update as a model that “democratizes” this kind of analysis. The full model is open-source on Hugging Face. Any cancer research lab with archived biopsy slides, and most of them have thousands, can now run virtual immune profiling without buying a single piece of new equipment.

[fannz @0xfannz]

i’m deeply disappointed with how jupiter’s team is communicating the jupuary postponement to may 2026. zero proper explanations, zero real reasons given – they just drop info on x and that’s it. zero professionalism and respect for people who’ve been holding and staking $jup for years.

and the info is being dropped by siong, who openly said he sees practically no value from $jup stakers. seriously? a guy managing one of the biggest projects on solana publicly dismisses the main long-term holder group. that’s a massive red flag for me.

this whole situation looks terrible. where did that positive jupiter vibe that once attracted the community go? it looks like the priority is to let mer holders peacefully realize their unlocks – big one in february, then more at the end of march and april. only after they exit will the community get jupuary – probably at a much lower price after a solid dump.

this isn’t a coincidence. if jupuary launched now or in the coming weeks, mers would have to sell parallel to the community and probably cheaper. so better to wait until the last asr closes (claim until end of april), they sell their tokens, and only then launch jupuary.

a project that massively delivers on products. simultaneously doesn’t give a fuck about the community that helped it reach this scale in the first place. it’s sick
and very demotivating.

i have a significant amount of $jup staked and selling now would mean a big loss, so i’m stuck. but trust is seriously undermined. for now i’m giving up any bigger involvement and waiting for the team to show that community is something more to them than just a source of volume and twitter hype.

red flag level expert. 😤

[川沐｜Trumoo🐮 @xiaomustock]

自从10.11号这天开始，btc直接与美股和黄金失去了关联性.
cz这俩口子那天是摧毁的整个行业.
cz：不承认不道歉不赔偿不要脸
我拿到的也只是他们那天强平接管我账户多扣走的10万u.但绝大部分人失去的是所有资产，同时未获得任何赔偿.

[Pickle Cat @0xPickleCati]

https://t.co/2ghAA5aLZB

[Tesla Owners Silicon Valley @teslaownersSV]

Be the penguin

[比特千里 @Qianbtcc]

10万变100万：普通人的稳健路径若你在币圈有10万U，是否想过把它变成100万U？
实现这个目标，其实有两条路径，认知不同，结果天差地别。
第一条路径：追求一步到位，盼着10万U直接翻10倍，
一口吃成100万U。这是大多数人最初的幻想，却极少有人能实现。
第二条路径：稳健复利，10万U先翻一倍变20万U，再翻一倍至40万U，
第三次翻倍达80万U，三次复利便无限接近100万U。
那些真正赚到钱的人，大多走的是这��路。
一定要吃透这条核心公式：收益=本金×波动率×时间。
举例来说，10万U本金，若一年涨幅达100%，
一年后就能翻倍至20万U，这就是复利的力量。
币圈多数韭菜的误区，是盲目放大波动率求快钱。
要么追涨杀跌，要么加杠杆博弈，哪怕一天仅涨5%，
拉长时间周期，用复利消化波动，稳步接近目标。
币圈从不缺一夜暴富的神话，但缺守住财富的清醒。
与其赌一次10倍的侥幸，不如赚三次翻倍的踏实，
复利才是普通人逆袭的核心密码。
选对标的、控好节奏、耐住性子，10万到100万的跨越，
从来不是靠赌，而是靠日复一日的稳健积累。
我始终坚持稳健复利逻辑，既能精选潜力标的，
也能把控时间节奏，避开波动率陷阱。
想跟着我走稳健复利路，从10万逐步迈向100万的兄弟，
随时跟上节奏，我们不赌神话，只赚确定的收益。

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

Only in @DegeneratesFnf

[ₕₐₘₚₜₒₙ @hamptonism]

i understand him now,

[Clyde C. @clydonymous]

Way too early into a new tiktok trend when no one spotted this..