ドライヘッドスパけい

掃除屋&時々ヘッドスパセラピスト💆資産防衛と自然栽培勉強中！ #XDC #XinFin #XLM #QNT #PLI #自然栽培

[玉ちゃん @tamazo2015]

トルコの名もなき兵士がカメラを向ける先は
戦闘車両に向かってくる名もなきシリア人の子供だった

よく見ると肌はすすだらけでその服装はボロボロだった

先の内戦で食べ物にありつけず、兵士のチョコレートを見て一目散に駆け付けたのだった

全て持っていけと少年に与えるが、持ちきれず落としてしまった

それを絶対欲しいはずなのに、少年は兵士に丁寧に返した

兵士はクッキーからありったけの物資を少年に渡すが

何度も振り返り手を振りお礼をする少年

この純粋な善意が拡散され醜い大人が起こした戦争は実に愚かだと世界中が涙した😢

[SEAMO @SEAMOjyukucho]

5年に一度のお願い⋯メガ粒子砲ばりに拡散お願いします🙇

🔗https://t.co/6AbvdjTLt0

#THEFIRSTTAKE
#SEAMO #マタアイマショウ

[ポン太 @pon_ta21]

母の年金は月7万円。そして毎月病院にかかっている。そんな人にまで3割負担は本当に辛い。結局、子どもである自分が負担することになるからだ。高齢者の医療費3割負担は、現役世代への負担増につながると分かっているのだろうか。

[Trilliana 華 @Trilliana_x]

拡散！
【移民に明確に反対です。】
原口一博
#ゆうこく連合は移民反対
#比例はゆうこく連合

[池田としえ @toshie_fujisan]

拡散希望‼️

[内海 聡 @touyoui]

まさに、と思ったかたはリツイート。

[Trilliana 華 @Trilliana_x]

📣ゆうこく支持の皆様！

AI分析によれば、ネット上のゆうこく連合拡散率は昨日より下がって⤵︎います！

▶︎ゆうこく関連ポストをがんがんリポスト！
▶︎#比例はゆうこく連合 を積極的にポスト！

あと２日、消費税廃止の為に、インボイスをなくす為に、薬害を無くす為に、日本を守る為に拡散✊！

[三宅洋平 @MIYAKE_YOHEI]

他の自治体にも波及してほしい動き

[11ppm @11ppm11]

--- 🇬🇧🇺🇸 --- ↓🇯🇵
XinFin is, in the context of the Globiance incident, both a victim and an institutional perpetrator. While XinFin formally presents itself as a decentralized network, when its decision-making structure, external conduct, and social influence are taken into account, it should be regarded in substance as a social entity that bears responsibilities equivalent to those of a corporation.

XinFin is no longer an experimental project operated by a small group of developers. It is an entity that partners with numerous developers and enterprises and seeks to operate across the globe. Given its scale and influence, XinFin must be far more consciously aware of the level of governance awareness and moral responsibility that is expected of it. Based on the current circumstances, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the awareness required of a corporate-level social actor has been severely lacking.

Unfortunately, within the blockchain space there are still individuals who blindly adhere to the notion that “everything in the blockchain world is a matter of self-responsibility.” However, this notion is an illusion in real society and is clearly mistaken. The more closely blockchain becomes integrated with existing society, the more what is required is not a lawless zone cloaked under the banner of “self-responsibility,” but governance, compliance, and moral responsibility. Awareness of these requirements has yet to sufficiently mature.

In particular, XinFin has emphasized compatibility with traditional finance and has deliberately adopted centralized structures such as KYC-enabled masternodes. If, under these conditions, Globiance was positioned as part of the ecosystem and investor trust was actively encouraged, then XinFin’s responsibility becomes all the more significant.

Mr. Atul Khekade (@atulkhekade), having received advice from third parties who clearly understood this structure—and having understood it himself—likely proposed the establishment of a recovery fund for this very reason. XinFin is a social victim betrayed by Globiance, while at the same time being a responsible party on the side of the institutional perpetrator. I understand the essence of his statement to be that he officially demonstrated a willingness to move toward resolution from that position.

And this, precisely, is the posture that a corporation ought to take. If a company is unable to understand this point, then it must be said that it lacks, to a serious degree, the moral awareness required of a social actor in modern society.

Mr. André Casterman (@AndreCasterman) himself is also a victim, having suffered losses to assets entrusted to Globiance. At the same time, by accepting a role as an executive of Globiance, he suffered significant damage to his reputation. Nevertheless, what merits respect is that he has not fled from the responsibility that accompanied his name being listed as an executive, and has continued to fulfill his responsibilities within the recovery fund. This posture deserves deep respect.

As XinFin grows larger as an organization, and as more time passes, it must seriously consider the possibility of being sued by victims of the Globiance incident. If such litigation were to be lost, the amount of damages would tend to increase over time. For this reason, XinFin should act proactively and engage in recovery efforts in order to mitigate potential litigation risks. Anyone with experience in the business world should be able to understand this judgment.

This perspective is not radical or unconventional; rather, it is an approach that has long been recognized in real-world judicial practice.

For example, in the 2001 Enron scandal, investors pursued responsibility not only from the individuals who directly committed wrongdoing, but also from the auditing firm Arthur Andersen. Due to its failure to fulfill its duty to provide proper audits and assurances of reliability, Arthur Andersen faced criminal prosecution (with the conviction later overturned), civil litigation, and severe reputational damage, ultimately leading to its effective dissolution.

Similarly, in the 2018 1MDB scandal, Goldman Sachs was held responsible for its involvement in misconduct related to the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund and was fined billions of dollars for failures in KYC and internal controls.

Furthermore, following the collapse of FTX in 2022, victims filed class-action lawsuits against the exchange operator and related advisors, alleging misrepresentation as a “trustworthy platform” and breaches of supervisory duties.

These cases demonstrate that, in judicial practice, pursuing liability from organizations that conducted due diligence, made recommendations, or conferred trust is considered the orthodox and standard approach, rather than targeting individual perpetrators whose whereabouts cannot be ascertained.

In the Globiance incident as well, XDC publicly explained that KYC-enabled masternodes “provide an additional layer of trust and compliance, allowing enterprises and businesses to participate with confidence while ensuring regulatory alignment.” In addition, Globiance was explicitly positioned as part of the long-term strategy in official ecosystem pages and roadmaps, and was repeatedly endorsed by co-founders and key figures through public statements and praise, thereby being presented to the community as an entity worthy of trust.

These were not accidental associations. They demonstrate that Globiance rationally acquired trust within the official ecosystem framework constructed by XDC itself. Accordingly, this matter cannot be dismissed as merely a problem involving a single exchange. It is an issue that concerns the governance of the entire XDC Network and demands an official explanation and response.

Under these circumstances, it is far more reasonable, in terms of both practical feasibility and the realization of justice, for victims to pursue legal action based on XinFin’s social responsibility and influence, rather than attempting to sue individuals whose whereabouts are unknown. This approach is not merely theoretical; it represents a standard and orthodox strategy in litigation practice.

XinFin’s proposal of a recovery fund can therefore be interpreted as an acknowledgment of these potential litigation risks and an understanding of the necessity of acting proactively.

I sincerely thank @blocksec_xdc @B3lle888 @AndreCasterman @atulkhekade. You have all devoted significant effort to addressing an extremely difficult problem, and I hold each of your efforts in deep respect and gratitude. 🙏

However, if you are devoting your energy to the recovery fund at the direction of XinFin, then it is necessary to understand, from a judicial and institutional perspective, one step more deeply the reality of XinFin’s position—namely, that it is both a victim and an institutional perpetrator, and that it bears social and ethical responsibility to participate proactively in the recovery process.

Going forward, with respect to the reconstruction of KYC, I believe it is essential not only to proceed appropriately with the externalization of KYC processes, but also to establish rules that clearly define the legal responsibilities of both parties in relation to node operators, and to implement a mechanism by which explicit consent to those rules is obtained.

--- ↓🇯🇵 ---

[ドライヘッドスパけい @cntcee]

このオンライン署名に賛同をお願いします！「孫の命を救って下さい！虐待によってPTSDを発症し心まで悲鳴をあげ、言葉にならないSOSを訴える子供を、虐待加害者に引き渡そうとする強制執行を停止させたい、絶対に孫を守りたい」 https://t.co/rsmAPASaZC @change_jpより

[あんどう裕(ひろし) 参政党参議院議員・税理士 @andouhiroshi]

これ、ぜひ読んで拡散してもらいたいです。

『食料品だけ消費税を下げるは、
マジで飲食店が潰れる政策。

消費税の話って難しいけど、
飲食店やってると身をもって理解します。』

#消費税は廃止一択
#いまこそ政策大転換

[チョーさん @chotokugi]

僕は代官山で、
自然食ダイニングバーを経営してます。

食料品だけ消費税を下げるは、
マジで飲食店が潰れる政策。

消費税の話って難しいけど、
飲食店やってると身をもって理解します。

簡単に言うと、

消費税は、
売上から勝手に抜かれる税金じゃなくて、利益を直接ぶっ潰す税金。

消費税は「お客さんの払った10%」を、
そのまま国に渡す税金じゃない。

一般の人ってこう思ってるよね。

「お客さんが1100円払ったら、
その中の100円が消費税で、
それを国に払うんでしょ？」

違う、違う。

現実はこうです。

消費税＝
（売上に含まれる税額）－（経費に含まれる税額）
＝ 差額を払う仕組み

ここに、とんでもない罠があるんです。

人件費には消費税がかからないという謎ルール

経費の大部分って、人件費でしょ？

・料理人の給料
・ホールスタッフの給料
・社会保険料
→ここに消費税は1円も乗ってない。

だから控除できないんです。

つまり飲食店は、

売上の消費税 → まるまる課税
経費の消費税 → 控除できない部分が莫大

結果どうなるか？

繁盛店で利益めっちゃ出てるなら
まだ絶えられるけど、

売り上げとんとん
少し赤字の店は

利益ゼロでも消費税だけ払う地獄。

これは飲食店オーナーなら、
全員知ってる闇の仕組み。

じゃあ、

「食料品の消費税だけ下げればいいじゃん」

という素人案が最悪な理由は、

一見、優しい政策に見えるけど現実は、

食材の消費税が下がる
↓
経費の中の“控除できる部分”が減る。

え、普通逆じゃない？と思うよね？

でもこれは本当に起きるんです。

要するに、

控除額が減る → 払う消費税は増える。

店の負担はガチで増します。

結果こうなります。

売上：変わらない
原価：変わらない
人件費：上がる
ガス電気：上がる
消費税負担：増える（←意味不明）

つまり、

「食料品の消費税減税」は、
飲食店にとって増税と同じ。

これ、飲食店やってない人には絶対わかりません。

しかも消費者からは、
「なんで値下げしないの？」と叩かれる。

食料品の消費税を下げたのに、
飲食店のラーメンや定食の価格が変わらないと、

「え？なんで安くしないの？」
「便乗値上げ？不誠実だよね」

と言われる。

現実はこれなのに…

店：控除減って消費税負担が増えた
客：値下げしない店が悪いと思う
→ 飲食店だけが一方的に苦しむ。

泣きっ面に蜂って、これのこと。

じゃあどうすればいいのか？

一部ではなく全部の消費税を
下げるか廃止しかない。

消費税5%に下げる。
消費税0%にする。

これは政治思想とか関係ない。

仕組みが狂ってる。

だから一部だけ下げると、
むしろ歪みが増します。

そしてインボイスで事務負担は爆増。

人件費は控除されないし、
輸出企業だけは控除が多くて得をする。

現場にいる僕らだけが苦しむ。

結論

食料品だけ消費税減税は、
飲食店を滅ぼします。

優しそうに見えて、最悪の政策。

代官山で、
自然食の店やってる僕は断言します。

飲食店の倒産は、
値上げのせいじゃない。
コロナだけでもない。

消費税の仕組みそのものが
飲食店の利益を根こそぎ奪ってる。

日本国民はマジで気付いた方がいい。
消費税は国民のための税じゃない。
国民を静かに殺す構造そのものなんです。

https://t.co/gz9vzUGv73

[11ppm @11ppm11]

--- 🇬🇧🇺🇸 --- ↓🇯🇵
The content of this post represents the personal opinion of Mr. blocksec @blocksec_xdc and not the official stance of XDC. This point must be clearly recognized.

It is highly inappropriate for someone deeply involved in the Globiance matter to publicly state that “XDC has no standing to seek reimbursement from Globiance,” especially before any legal agreement between XDC and Globiance has been finalized. Such a statement should not be made from his position. Matters of legal responsibility or contractual judgment can only be communicated by XDC’s official representatives or legal counsel.

Even if Mr. Atul @atulkhekade were to state in an official setting that “XDC will not hold Globiance accountable,” such a decision would have to be explicitly written into a formal legal agreement between XDC and Globiance. Announcing such a conclusion publicly on social media beforehand risks misunderstanding and could create legal complications. While it is possible that he spoke privately with Atul, it was not appropriate to disclose such matters publicly. More discretion is needed.

In fact, XDC co-founder Atul Khekade has made a clear statement regarding the Globiance issue:
“The rescue fund should at a later date be recovered from Globiance.”
This makes it evident that XDC’s plan to lead the reimbursement process is based on the premise that responsibility will still rest with Globiance. Therefore, Mr. blocksec’s claim that “XDC will not recover the funds” or “has no standing to do so” directly contradicts Atul’s stated position.

Atul’s intent is not only to protect victims but also to clarify legal and structural accountability and to establish preventive measures for the future. Through this statement, he clearly expresses XDC’s intention to pursue proper recovery and legal recourse, rather than absolving Globiance of responsibility. This is the correct stance to maintain the community’s trust.

I believe XDC also bears a degree of responsibility for the Globiance incident. Therefore, the creation of the rescue fund is not merely an act of goodwill but a legally and ethically appropriate response. Otherwise, XDC itself might have faced legal action from affected users—and could very well have lost such a case. The Globiance issue is not solely the fault of Globiance; it is a structural problem stemming from XDC’s prolonged neglect of KYC and internal governance standards. Despite multiple community proposals to implement verified KYC vendors, these were delayed, which contributed to the circumstances that enabled this incident.

By acting proactively before potential lawsuits, XDC made a wise and forward-looking decision, one that also makes sound business sense. The next essential step is to establish a formal legal agreement with Globiance and conduct the reimbursement process with a solid legal foundation. Should Globiance breach that agreement, XDC must be prepared to take legal action. This is critical for ensuring accountability and preventing similar problems in the future.

As long as XDC maintains KYC requirements, some degree of centralization risk will remain. That is precisely why delegating KYC responsibilities to external, trusted vendors is crucial to distributing accountability and ensuring transparency. While full decentralization may not be feasible, institutional design can and should minimize these risks.

Finally, I remain grateful for Mr. blocksec’s dedication and continued efforts. 🙏

However, the content of his recent post could unintentionally undermine the diligent legal and negotiation work being carried out by Atul and the team. Going forward, I respectfully urge that all public statements be made only after the official position has been clearly defined.

[blocksec @blocksec_xdc]

Update on the Reimbursement Process

We’ll publish an uptake form for you to submit your reimbursement claim in the coming days. Each claim will be verified (among other things) against on-chain fund flows and the evidence you provide — including Globiance account balances, transaction history, and screenshots.

We’ll also ask for your X (Twitter) handle and Telegram username. These are optional, but a history of posts about your Globiance losses can help validate claims.

The reimbursement process will be overseen by me, @B3lle888, and @AndreCasterman. We may invite other trusted community members to assist in various ways. Please trust only updates from us, and beware of scammers pretending to represent this process.

So far, Globiance appears willing to share some user data with us — but only if users give explicit permission. A consent form for that will therefore be included with the uptake form. That said, whether Globiance provides enough reliable data for us to validate claims is beyond our control.

If Globiance cooperates fully, the process should run relatively smoothly. If not, some or even many cases may prove difficult to verify. Negotiations are ongoing, and we hope Globiance will provide the information needed to complete this effort properly.

A few key points to bear in mind:

Each claim must be independently verified. In some cases, we may reach out for additional information. We don’t yet know how many claims we’ll need to process — so please be patient.

Once a claim is approved, it will be submitted to the XDC team, who will disburse funds from their reserves.

There will be a vesting schedule for reimbursements. The specifics are still being finalized, but this step is economically necessary. For example, payouts might occur in tranches — such as one-third immediately, one-third after six months, and one-third after one year. The final schedule will depend on the number of claims and total XDC distributed.

The percentage reimbursed (e.g., 100%, 90%, 75%) will likewise depend on total verified losses. Atul and Ritesh remain committed to doing everything possible to make victims whole, while also protecting the economic integrity of the ecosystem and its existing holders.

Only XDC losses will be reimbursed (not BTC, ETH, etc.), and the staking rewards Globiance promised users will not be reimbursed.

Finally, once claims are validated and disbursements begin, we’ll provide periodic public updates, including:
• Total number of claims received
• Number of claims verified
• Total funds disbursed (with on-chain data)

Thanks for your continued patience. Once we reach an agreement with Globiance on data sharing, we'll be able to begin the process.

[トッポ @w2skwn3]

【🎙️恐怖のムコライス‼️何と日本人の主食の米にmRNAをぶち込む作戦🍚💉】

みなさん‼️信じられないニュースが飛び込んできました💥
日本政府と農林水産省が、国民の主食「お米」にワクチンを仕込む“ムコライス計画”を推進中です😱🍙💉

はい、注射じゃなくて、食べて摂取するワクチンです😨
その名も「ムコライス」‼️千葉大学と朝日工業社が共同開発したこの“経口ワクチン米”は、なんと常温保存OK😶‍🌫️インフルエンザワクチンなど年間4,000万人が打つワクチンに使われる可能性があるそうです💉🍚

しかも‼️問題は「知らないうちに口に入る」ことなんです😵‍💫
スーパーで売られるご飯や給食、外食に混ざってても分からない💦
選ぶ自由も拒否する権利も奪われて、気づいたら“体内mRNA改造”が完了してるって…これ、完全に人権侵害じゃないですか⁉️😤😤😤

💥農林水産省、いい加減にして‼️
💥日本政府、国民をモルモット扱いするな‼️
💥治験大国にして誰が得する⁉️
グローバル製薬とズブズブな利権政治屋さんは落選させよう🧬💸

アメリカでは市民が声を上げて政府が“予防原則”に戻りました😤
でも日本は？国民の同意なく進められるこの計画、誰も止めないの？
いまこそ声を上げる時です📢

ムコライスなんていらない‼️
お米は命、ワクチンじゃない🍚💔
私たちの食卓を、遺伝子組み換え実験場にするな🧬🔥

📢この投稿を広めて、みんなでこの“米ワクチン計画”を止めましょう😤💪💢
#ムコライス反対 #食の安全を守れ #ワクチンは注射でやれ #農水省仕事しろ #日本人の主食に手を出すな

[🌸🇯🇵TanakaSeiji橙🇯🇵🌸 @Tanakaseiji14]

岩屋毅外相が22日の「日中ハイレベル経済対話」で中国に精米の輸入拡大を求めた/産経新聞

日本米を輸出して！
中国米を輸入！おかしいだろ！
売国奴！岩屋！
#岩屋外務大臣の更迭を求めます

[サキガケ @nihonpatriot]

こども家庭庁、必要ないと思う人🖐️

【朗報】7兆3270億円に予算増額したこども家庭庁を解体すれば『新生児1人につき1000万円』配れる事が判明。こども家庭庁いる？ https://t.co/FYyZm7N3o4

[サキガケ @nihonpatriot]

こども家庭庁、必要ないと思う人RT

【朗報】7兆3270億円に予算増額したこども家庭庁を解体すれば『新生児1人につき1000万円』配れる事が判明。こども家庭庁いる？
https://t.co/FYyZm7N3o4