Interesting but not surprising. She also refused to respond to the @TennFirearms 2nd Amendment Candidate survey. Both John Rose and Monty Fritts did respond. @JohnRoseforTN@MontyFritts4TN
https://t.co/Ob8MB6hd0y
Sometimes I wish our Founding Fathers had written every single law out in excruciating detail that was impossible to argue or misinterpret.
But then again, back then most people actually had common sense and didn't need "do not eat" instructions on packets of laundry detergent.
I don't think they could have ever fathomed how dumb future generations would become.
I dream of a world where people own themselves. It is a world where every individual truly owns the fruits of their labor, their properties and assets, their bodies, and their reputations. In this world, people freely and voluntarily choose to associate or disassociate with others as they see fit. Companies and people alike are judged solely on their merits, and no one has the ability to control anyone else. It is a world of liberty in its raw form. Taxation (extortion) does not exist as a societal norm. The norm is voluntary contributions to providers of goods and services at rates mandated acceptable by a truly free market.
While such a world is far from utiopian, and bad things will happen, it is a world that is truly just and fair. Bad actors will be exiled via mass disassociation, if not removed by some other permanent means. Societies will demand respect for every individual, as one's reputation is their most valuable currency. There is no government because there is self-governance.
The world does not need the state to exist. In fact, the natural state of the world is one without government. This is not some fairy tale. It is what the natural world has established. Every individual has been conditioned to believe it evil, unrealistic, or chaotic. The natural state of things cannot be any of those things.
The world I dream of is not fantasy. It can absolutely thrive if the state were abolished. The slaves just need to wake up decide to make it happen.
Just for context, here: Clarence Thomas is usually a very reserved writer. His opinions amount to something like 200 pages of material PER YEAR.
If you've managed to draw 91 pages out of this man on a single opinion, then you probably deserve a generational beatdown.