My university tried something like this years ago. The winners were great resume optimisers but mediocre scientists, and it was a remarkable morale killer for everyone else
It wasn't really good, but I respect the weirdness of making a children's cartoon-looking thing that's clearly taking inspiration from Permutation City
Went to see TADC in the theatre. Weird experience. Lot of teens loudly memeing in the first half, and then the second half was so sad that people were audibly crying.
Can water intake prevent Alzheimer’s disease? No. This is fully AI-generated… but the data below could easily pass as real.
The new ChatGPT image model is truly impressive, but I think it poses a real risk for scientific integrity in future.
For example, I could just generate a dataset with a single prompt that appears to show something like water preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Ironically, we used to laugh at obvious “AI slop” (like those weird generated mice), but that’s changing pretty fast. If I were reviewing this fake figure today, I’m not sure I could reliably tell whether this figure is real or AI-generated?
The bigger issue is that the usual signals we rely on e.g., how realistic or plausible something looks are no longer enough.
I think we really need more comprehensive AI detection and, more importantly, stronger verification standards for scientific submissions going forward. We’ll probably also need better ways to digitize lab notebooks and ensure access to raw data, something closer to how code and version history are tracked...
i'm not joking my supervisor ASKED me to draw "the worm i always draw on my cells" because i didn't last week and all of them fucking died for NO REASON😭😭😭😭
Many neuro labs have an ephys guy who’s getting scammed bc he’s too autistic to either notice or care. and for some reason he also can’t tell that his coworkers aren’t anywhere near as technically talented