@unisontheunion@AndreaEganGS These people cannot see into the future when their videos and statements will remain there for all to see. They will not be able to hide when reality, intelligence and commonsense are totally back in the room. How embarassing for your grandchildren to watch.
@JournalismSEEN What I am reading here is something along lines of the court made a ruling, but we disagree with the ruling. So can you change the rules to violate the court order...
@PulaRJS 99% of trans women can be correctly sexed by looking at them, and, if not by looks, then the moment they speak. If you are experiencing difficulties, then a trip to SpecSavers will help and/or a hearing aid will do the job.
@PulaRJS So you’re saying it’s impossible to know what sex someone is, but everyone knows what sex they are pretending to be?
Do you hear yourself? Perhaps the men you want to treat with sensitivity should just stop breaking the law, and leave women alone.
This should be running on screens across the country, like airports, trains, buses, and supermarkets, and during ad breaks on prime-time television, so everyone sees the absolute incompetence of this government.
How is it possible that these unimpressive people who are clearly unqualified and seemingly don’t even care enough to try to look competent and professional seize control of the most powerful offices in the country?
They don’t have the capability to run a lemonade stand never mind steward a two trillion dollar economy.
Not sure I could love Germaine Greer any more than I do. Everytime I watch this clip 💜💜 her a little more. For all the sex denialists this is the original critique of “gender”. Take note: Women are a sex class.
Andy Burnham claims he commissioned the biggest grooming gang review the country has ever seen. He states that whilst other politicians looked away, he did not. Then came the line he should regret. Those are the facts, he told people. Look them up.
So I did. I read his own reports.
_________
I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry.
You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back.
I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing.
Sign Up Here:
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays
My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year).
Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy
If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help.
Raja 🙏
@micheal_olainn The vast majority of men who identify as women never get their penises removed. They are largely heterosexual men with autogynephilia, and they are nearly five times more likely to be incarcerated sex offenders than other men.
The Family Tree Problem Nobody Wants to Touch
Sweden has now done what Britain still tiptoes around: it banned cousin marriage.
Not “discouraged.” Not “sensitively debated.” Banned.
And once again the British political class reacts to an obvious biological and social problem as though it were an unspeakable mystery requiring another decade of consultations, diversity panels and carefully managed euphemisms.
The facts are not controversial. Repeated cousin marriage dramatically increases the risk of recessive genetic disorders, infant mortality, developmental disabilities and inherited disease. That is not “far-right misinformation.” That is basic genetics.
The risk doubles even in first-cousin marriages. In communities where cousin marriage repeats across generations, the consequences become exponentially worse because the same harmful mutations circulate within the same bloodlines for decades.
Doctors know this. Hospitals know this. Entire NHS wards know this.
Britain has spent years pretending this is merely a “cultural sensitivity issue” while taxpayers quietly absorb the medical, social and economic costs. Meanwhile Sweden looked at the data and concluded something revolutionary by modern Western standards: biology still exists.
What makes the debate even more absurd is that Europe itself understood this centuries ago. The Church restricted cousin marriage for generations because societies built around clan structures become tribal, insular and resistant to wider national cohesion. Joseph Henrich’s work on the development of Western societies points directly at this shift away from clan-based systems as one of the foundations of stable, prosperous democracies.
In simple terms: when people stop marrying inside the clan, loyalty gradually shifts from blood networks toward institutions, communities and the nation itself.
That matters.
Because cousin marriage is not just a medical issue. It reinforces clannism, arranged marriage systems, honour structures and parallel societies where family loyalty overrides social integration. In parts of Britain, particularly within some highly endogamous communities, cousin marriage remains common even after several generations in the UK. The result is not assimilation but permanent separation.
And yet every attempt to discuss the issue honestly is immediately buried under accusations of intolerance.
Curiously, the same politicians who would ban cigarettes, regulate sugar, lecture the public about obesity and monitor carbon footprints suddenly become libertarians the moment cousin marriage enters the conversation.
Sweden decided enough was enough.
Britain still behaves as though acknowledging genetics might offend somebody.