I like the minimalist approach some phone companies are taking, physical keyboards, no distractions mode but it’s missing a privacy approach, stock android is NOT secure
El gobierno mexicano utilizando IA para generar vídeos con texto ilegible, errores y deformaciones en pleno desfile.
¿De verdad nadie pudo revisarlo?
¿Cuántos freelancers, personas individuales o empresas mexicanas pudieron haberse beneficiado de ese trabajo, en lugar de simplemente aventarlo a la flojera?
We've identified an issue with an authentication component which is contributing to impact. To address this, we've developed a remediation strategy and we're applying it to a portion of infrastructure to test its efficacy. Once we've confirmed this resolves impact, we'll apply the solution more broadly. For more information, please see EX1464935 in the admin center.
Internal platforms do not fail only because the tech is weak. They fail when nobody owns the boring middle: migrations, exceptions, documentation, support, and the awkward process changes users actually feel.
@mantancino_ This is why I distrust language popularity charts as architecture evidence. In enterprise systems, the boring constraint is usually not what people like. It is what the org can hire for, support, review, and keep alive for years.
@nucocloud Yes. The dangerous part is not using one vendor. It is letting that vendor become part of your architecture contract without saying it out loud. Pricing changes are painful. Behavior changes are worse.
I'm hiring a fullstack tech lead for my company
.NET and JavaScript a must (we do lots of React, so that's ideal)
Must be personable and be able to talk to clients
Experience with AI, Azure, the "dev lops", squeals (we call it SQL for short)
Please RT for reach
@StockMKTNewz The interesting part is not "AI replacing vendors." It is whether Starbucks can own the workflow well enough to maintain the tools after the demo. Internal software saves money only when ownership is real.
Building internal tools to replace vendors only works if the company also builds internal ownership. Otherwise you just replace a subscription with a permanent support problem.
@mipsytipsy@StackOverflow That line hits harder inside large orgs. If engineering managers do not keep the standard clear, the standard gets replaced by whatever is easiest to measure. Usually speed, tickets, or visibility.