Salman • Dusken.io

Building Making feedback easier to give and impossible to lose. Record feedback. Dusken transcribes it and makes it searchable.
DMs open

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

Sometimes I wonder why creative feedback is still this messy in 2026.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@Bha74142Shivani fifty skills is a lot of surface area. the real test is whether any of them reduce your distraction load or just add a new tool to check.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@hayyantechtalks If the system prompts itself, who owns the output when it drifts? I'd rather understand my prompts than trust a black box that hides its reasoning.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@robynxpark @linear the pseudo-manager line lands. every tool that asks me to describe what I want before I make it turns design into spec work.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@0xKiyoro 798 uploads to 28.5M vs one prompt to one video. The real insight isn't the AI — it's that the original channel was already a formula. He just automated the formula, not the creativity.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@shannholmberg @NousResearch the company brain pulling meeting notes and client threads is the part that actually makes this work — without that each bot is just a solo agent with a fancy pfp.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@ridark_eth how does Quill handle tone and voice drift over time, or does it just mirror your last 50 writings

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@HustleBitch_ $7,800 a week for gas station work means one thing: you're getting paid to solve a problem the owner can't fix with money. That place is a front.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@ScottyBeamIO so the real question is what tasks will we actually finish now that we can offload the annoying parts

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@heyrohitai so it's not just about optimizing models, but designing the entire system around them

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@sairahul1 point 3 is the one nobody fixes because it means instrumenting every tool call. the savings are real but the work is invisible.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@rvaniaaaa the diagram is right but the naming hurts. harness isn't a layer, it's the ground. loop isn't a layer, it's the engine. graph isn't a layer, it's the map. three jobs, fine. calling them layers invites the same confusion.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@hasantoxr instruction-based editing without regeneration is the hard part. every model claims it but the object removal usually hallucinates a different object back in.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@0xKiyoro $10.5K on 60M views means he’s optimizing for volume, not RPM. The format is the product, the content is just the delivery mechanism.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@Diptish09 @atlas_cloud_ai 20% off is nice, but how do you handle review and feedback on generated videos?

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@mikenevermiss $2,400/year of agents that can't tell you whether a footnote actually contradicts the 10-K. Wall Street pays for liability, not just information.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@markproduct https://t.co/xa81RaB4Wh

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@blocks open sourcing the desktop app — does that mean the model configs ship with it, or is it more of a BYO-keys situation

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@RealMarvelX so he's essentially reverse-engineering viral content to create a formula for success, then automating the rest

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@thelichhh The property-to-knowledge pivot is the whole thing. Ownership isn't about keeping, it's about discovering what you'd never learn without having skin in the decision.

[Salman • Dusken.io @codesharpdev]

@cryptowluha $62k is either cap or he's found an ad rate loophole. 20-minute videos at that scale means volume, not quality. you could pump 30 a day but the RPM on faceless channels is usually dogshit.