There is no direct evidence it came from the wet market. Like I said it resides in data either China won't give up or destroyed. Which is explicity why it can't be ruled out and they explicitly wont rule it out as stated in SAGO. Yet you and Destiny seem to know bettter than the cohort and claim 100% cerntainty.
The mere presence of humanized animals is a risk in and of itself no editing of virsues needed. A humanized animal getting into the wild would be like opening pandoras box on potential pathogens. All of which would use said animal to undergo zoonosis to adapt to be potentially transmissable to humans.
They were caught deleting sequences from the database. Jesse Bloom recovered 13 of them. Why delete sequences? That doesnt prove anytging admittedly but it does bring into question transparency in the least. They also wont share safety audit data or early case data etc. Without this data you CAN NOT rule out lab involvement. Without the lab data total list of virus sequences, safety audits etc. You can't rule out the lab, zoonosis doesnt rule out the lab. Without an infected animal you can not point definitively to the market. You have deleted sequences, amd Chinas historical pattern of crossing ethical bounds. They litterally were the subject of international critique and ethical condemnation when CRISPR was first developed for editing a human embryo. Both scenarios remain plausible, the current AVAILABLE data seems to suggest a natural spillover but we do NOT know this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Pre-planned? It wouldnt need to be planned. No intent is required for a virus to be accidentally exposed to a humanized animal which would allow a natural virus adapt. Or a lab animal escape into the market etc. But you are correct China has witheld the data needed to say one way or the other to put this to bed.
@DerekDenhamAlan@denaltb@TheOmniLiberal@ezralevant Again you don't understand what Im saying. Do you not know what humanozed animals are for? The possibility isnt that science created it with some intent by a willful scientist. It enabled it to happen(potentially) by reducing the ecological and genetic threshold.
@BIGBAMofficial@EtanonLIVE@puddingmomentum@denaltb@TheOmniLiberal@ezralevant βSAGO cannot conclude with certainty where and when this occurred, nor if the Huanan Seafood Market was indeed the first instance of spillover into the human population, or the site of further spillover and/or amplification.β