Chris “$8 peasant” Jones

Made you look.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@infogulch @ChrisPeikert I just checked with my 384 sided dice and it's 100%

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

To confuse your enemies, you must first confuse yourself.

[墨无归 @Moblacksoil]

埃隆·马斯克建议不要为太空芯片降温，反而——让它们在高温下工作。 这正是太空数据中心的真正悖论所在所有人都以为：“太空里可是−270°C，芯片会自己冷却。”实际上恰恰相反。在真空里没有空气，也没有水来带走热量。真空就像一个巨大的保温瓶：芯片产生的热量会留在了里面。唯一摆脱它的办法——就是通过大型散热板以红外光的形式辐射出去。 这时，严酷的物理定律就登场了。散热板越冷，它辐射的热量就越弱。
根据斯特藩-玻尔兹曼定律，辐射功率与**绝对温度的四次方**成正比。如果只是将芯片的工作温度在开尔文温标上提高20%，散热板就能辐射出两倍的热量。这意味着散热板可以做得小两倍、更轻。马斯克在视频中讲的正是这个： “如果将工作温度在开尔文温标上提高20%，散热板的质量就能减半。因此，在太空里工作在更高温度下更有利。” 在地球上，我们花费数十亿美元来保持芯片低温。在太空里，更划算的设计是让芯片能在100–120°C下稳定工作。那样散热板就会大幅减轻，发射成本也会急剧下降。而且神经网络对辐射引起的随机比特错误相当耐受——对于一个巨大的模型，几翻转的比特几乎没什么影响。 结果，空间人工智能的主要问题不是能量（太空里的太阳光免费且恒定），而正是散热。马斯克建议解决它的办法不是冷却，而是利用温度。

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@FeimiBeilun55 @orleanz @yvbbrjdr To confuse your enemies, you must first confuse yourself.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@orleanz @yvbbrjdr (ie they would be way way way less efficient for LLMs)

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@orleanz @yvbbrjdr Your snark here is recognised and appropriate, but we should note that it is possible to build chips that can tolerate much higher temperature and radiation envelopes, for industrial/military/spaceflight purposes.

The downside is that they're nowhere near leading edge nodes.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@JeremyMonjo As soon as I saw it, I instantly thought of one school friend. Sent it to him and he immediately appreciated it.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@AshtonForbes You were banned from Reddit for hate speech. You chose to give up your voice there bud.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@AshtonForbes "In their 2025 preprint simulation, a 1.5 GW fusion plant could make about 3 t of gold a year, which would need roughly 7–18 years of storage, depending on the radioactivity threshold. No such plant exists yet, and mines produce about 3,300 t a year."

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@BedfordJul99993 @adams_at_mh370 @AshtonForbes You haven't eliminated that the videos are fucking fake. Which they clearly are.
Occam's razor wins over Conan Doyle here. The videos are fake, the plane crashed, Ashton is a shameless grifting scumbag.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@YammyLand @lydiakauppi I'm not saying this is a *good* idea, but if you set Apple Music to repeat that single track, and turn on its "AutoMix" feature, you can listen to this looped until the world runs out of electricity.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@IamNotaCatalyst @Griffith_Femto_ @KRAVENMOVIES Wrong.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@Brian4401797972 @PillerRed “a tooth associated with her type of cancer”…

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@Sureshotsmokey @PillerRed No, you go to a fucking doctor, dipshit.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@7struhhturt7 @PillerRed No you’re not. If you have cancer, go to a fucking doctor and try real medicine that has been tested and shown to have a measurable success rate. You fucking ghoul.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@ThatGuyM77 @AustralisPiper @pdubl22 @ken_caudle @PeterCiszewski @space_audits @haprho @Roohyfnol @did8hurtu @NMS575 @LChange49238 @DrMikeHeffron The simple fact that on a clear, calm day out at sea, you observe a sharp horizon in all directions, is excellent evidence that the earth is curving down away from you in all directions.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@Letters1982 @vinniemalaguti @3mrwellington3 Your claim is wrong and nothing but a regurgitation of Nathan Oakley.
The earth is neither observed, measured, or navigated flat. It’s a globe in all of those scenarios.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@beesblaas47 @PearSpheroid @haprho You should spend some time studying geodetic surveying. Curve is measured all the time.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@isosteph I put this tweet into my Chat Gippity and it made a sad face.

[Chris “$8 peasant” Jones @cmsj]

@solomon_grundle @_cingraham When the rogue AIs take over, it will be by hijacking our brains with stuff like this.