@Skoorbkaz That's the problem, just because consciousness is not visible, not observable, doesn't mean you can use that and assign it to software. There is the same level of difference between consciousness and software, as it is between robots and human.
@coinspectrum@BitcoinCashOG Currently building : https://t.co/qFGlatFqb7 the goal is to be the starting point for collaboration, learning and building keeping it consistent 🦦
A builders meet up network
CC : @BitcoinCashOG@bch_1_official
@Nurain_Dev I think we need more activity in app development, testing. Bitcoin Cash is focused entirely on real life merchant adoption. While the strength currently for large scale adoption remains in e-commerce. So I would focus more on e-commerce.
@Nurain_Dev Technology and Community are the strengths of Bitcoin Cash.
What is already good.
Funding.
Ecosystem coordination.
What could be improved.
Adoption.
Marketing.
@Nature Consciousness and intelligence should be assigned to natural - biological life to prevent confusion.
Robots can behave and look like human, but they are not identical, and we don't assign human name to robots, we shouldn't do so with intelligence and consciousness.
@God50828651@RVN_Maximalist@AltcoinDaily#RVN is currently on all time lows, and x25 will make it go 0.034$ nothing extraordinary considering previous ath range from 0.06$ to 0.20$ +.
A friend told me Bitcoin can't do 100x anymore because there isn't enough electricity to mine it. I ran the numbers. A 100x after the next halving means miners earn about $1.8 billion a day, enough to pay for around 500 GW of mining. That's about 14% of the world's electricity, or some 500 nuclear reactors, and nobody builds that in one halving cycle. Who gets the miners first: countries that can permit a dam or a reactor in months, or ones that don't require permits at all?
See the cost of mining vs. price correlation, about how hashrate follows price (not the other way around), based on mining cost (capital cost of ASICs and electricity)
https://t.co/QBsz7TBikU
Camera ≠ artificial eye.
Bycicle ≠ artificial horse.
Airplane ≠ artificial bird.
Bulb ≠ artificial sun.
CPU/GPU ≠ artificial brain.
Why would we name a software - "artificial intelligence" no matter how good it is?
@ripgarythegoat Because I apply the same rule everywhere.
A human can't emerge out of empty room.
Software can't emerge out of hardware.
Driver can't emerge out of vehicle components.
Captain and passengers can't emerge out of ship.
You disagree on consciousness because it's not observable.