Wake Forest SOS
Massey - 23
ESPN - 38
Those tend to be the two most commonly used.
What point are you trying to make by saying look at the schedule? Not like it’s top 10 but clearly isn’t just free wins…
October 10, 2015:
Wake Forest beats BC 3-0.
Watch this highlight to witness collective ineptitude the likes we may never see again. Interceptions fumbles, missed FGs, awful clock management. This game has it.
@mcblimp95 I don’t dislike your data, Chris. I never even challenged it. I joked that based on your posts Wake might as well give up 50. Multiple exchanges later, you’ve somehow arrived at “you just don’t like the data.”
Based on all of the analytics done here by Chris, Wake will give up 50 to NC State
I haven’t seen a single stat that says Wake can even win this game, Chris has disputed every statistic on Twitter revolving around this game. Clearly Chris knows ball.
NC State and Wake Forest have one game to compare to, and as an FYI these numbers David has provided are unadjusted EPA’s.
Wake vs Louisville had a 0.436 EPA/drive
NC State vs Louisville had 0.733 EPA/Drive
@mcblimp95 My friend, whether each caveat is individually defensible isn’t my point. It’s that every favorable Wake stat presented to you has produced a caveat, qualification or rebuttal. You can explain why each time, but at some point you’re just proving the pattern I was joking about.
@mcblimp95 You keep narrowing this to my replies. I’m talking about the pattern. Wake 4th in adjusted YPP? You asked for the source, then dismissed it. Favorable EPA? “Unadjusted.” You say you’re not disputing everything, but every favorable Wake stat seems to come with an asterisk.