Now I understand the trick to tweeting: selectively picking data that supports my conclusion from a seemingly authoritative source (or not mentioning the source at all).
Firstly, the research focuses on ranking, not percentages, because some cultures tend to mention only one thing that gives them meaning. For example, “19% of South Koreans mention material well-being, while 42% say the same in Spain, but the topic is ranked first in South Korea and second in Spain.” The tweet only cites percentage images, implying that East Asians only care about material success while Westerners care less about it. I don’t know why you still do that when the researcher already state this in the first several pages.
Second, you ignores the most important conclusion graph from this research. The summary of the conclusion ranking is on the very first page (I’m not sure why you didn’t pick it), clearly showing a conclusion very different from what you imply here.
Source of the research: https://t.co/gTa3MufKTN
I don’t really remember how I was introduced to @collabfund newsletters but I’m so glad I did.
I find a piece that resonates with me in every single one of them.
https://t.co/tfUYjERhIh