@ksliz22 No, it doesn’t. That’s the point though. Teach ed. programs (I was assuming you were saying college) are teaching inquiry as the key and primary way of instructing. However, I think may teachers understand that it is does not work or work well consistently.
Yes. If I were forced to use the curriculum programs given by our district I would be heavily modifing. Its only worse to use your own stuff if you are given something halfway decent in the first place.
I would rather see a hodgepodge of materials than OpenSciEd for example
📘 My new Teaching for Attention Playbook is a 70+ page, evidence-informed guide that breaks down the science of attention and provides 6 practical strategies to support teachers.
It covers how to:
🎯 Secure Attention: Create the conditions for students to focus
🎯 Direct Attention: Guide students towards important information
🎯 Orchestrate Attention: Manage where attention goes as learning unfolds
👉 Want a free copy? REPOST and comment ATTENTION below, and I’ll DM you the link.
⏰ Available free until Wednesday 30 September at 11:59pm AWST
@dylanwiliam@tombennett71 SoL with an emphasis on examples and non- examples in context, concrete modeling, and practicing, that would be help. However, knowledge of something is often not enough to change practice.
Show me a school that serves disadvantaged students that gets excellent test scores (ie growth) that uses permissive behavior management methods and so-called progressive teaching approaches.
@MrZachG Here is an issue: everyone pointing fingers, but I only feel like I can find the “inquiry curriculums” like open sci ed freely available. So if we want to make a change, we need curricula built different and easily accessible.
This is one reason why it’s so critical for teachers to have a mental model of how learning happens. When you know for example that the overwhelming consensus of cognitive psychologists is that knowledge deeply encoded in long-term memory & readily accessible facilitates higher order thinking you should be instantly skeptical of, say, Boaler-esque research claiming to have found the opposite. You don’t have to dismiss it out of hand but your first reaction should be: that is very surprising & goes against consensus. Let me look closer…
@adamboxer1 The real danger of "when done well" is that many educational interventions require considerable teacher skill to do well, so looking only at the results of those teachers is cherry-picking the data. It looks like an intervention effect, but it's really a teacher quality effect.