@mto_on_x @ReubenR80027912 Nah, OP was correct in saying "is."
"There is no difference" = emphasizes the concept of "difference" as a singular abstraction.
"There are no differences" = emphasizes the distinct differences between two concepts.
OP was leaning for a more rhetorical tone. Ergo, "Is"
@hwangchewwwn@mai_komagata@mbacarella@LongZavier@ReubenR80027912 You expect someone with low literacy to understand that "...was portrayed by the author as being..." is the question they're trying to answer?
Funny how many people in these replies are proving the original point that there's a literacy crisis.
@XENONAISELSTEIN That's crazy, damn. The idea of using ST on DID is absolutely wild to me. Sorry that happened. :/
If you want resources, I got you: https://t.co/HAMEdPoKN8
Haven't updated it since ~2023, but it's still pretty good, I'd say.
โIโm about to engage in an extreme act of protest. But compared to what people have been experiencing in Palestine at the hands of their colonizers, itโs not extreme at all.
This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal.โ
Aaron Bushnell, 2/25/24 ๐คโค๏ธ
I know this is a made up question, but my guess is (d).
Because it's an "is it possible?" question with a correct answer, the answer must be objectively correctโyes & no simultaneously.
Only (c) offers that.
However, (c) ignores the variable of whether you've been convinced.
Since everyone is talking about LSAT questions, here's one of the "170 breaker questions." There are ~12 on each test and they are meant to be the hardest questions on the LSAT. Getting them right tends to predict scoring very highly (above 170)
"Is it possible IF you've been convinced?"
We have to remove the "IF" variable of the question. (b) removes it by making the question constant.
So, you need (b) to make a question with one answer, and (c) to incorporate the objectively correct answer (yes & no).
Thus, (d).