@burgert88 @RicciGeri@RepRaskin So it doesn’t matter that the “cop” was protecting Congress, and Babbitt was part of an invading mob? You think their skin colors would have more important than that? You’re delusional.
@RepJoeNeguse Thank you, Rep. Joe Neguse, for calling out Mark Green, using his own words. That’s a verbal punch in the face. Professional combat, against dangerous adversaries. Thank you. Keep it up.
@ksorbs 2016-2020, Kimmel was succeeding in his career, thinking clearly about narcissistic fascists, and treating his family well. Bet you weren’t doing any of those.
@VivekGRamaswamy It’s a classic weasel move to make open ended predictions. Name the person you say is so obviously anointed, or most of us will call you for your BS. This post is a poll to see who your respondents THINK you’re talking about. Take a stand or take a seat. Not both.
@drivingtipdaily@LeadingReport It didn’t take four years. This was already in the court cases that Trump’s team lost. The hand counted ballots were there, but they didn’t have digital images. It’s not new, it’s not true, and it’s how MAGA is treating you like a sucker.
@gwoodak@LeadingReport This didn’t “just come out”. It was part of the court cases that Trump’s team lost, and it was nothing because the hand counted ballots were there. Just no digital images. The claim is a lie, and it’s an old one and that.
@SpeakerJohnson I’ll believe you when you’ve released them. Looking forward to the MAGA voters seeing their own mob’s chaos and hatred themselves, since their echo chamber media doesn’t cover it honestly.
@TiffMoodNukes@SpeakerJohnson I’m progressive, and I’m looking forward to the tapes being released. Then everyone can see the chaos and hatred from the MAGA mob for themselves. That is, IF Mike Johnson ACTUALLY follows through.
@TerryTheDude73@BassProShops Asking for ID isn’t harming your second amendment rights. 2A doesn’t say “anonymous”, “unregulated”, “private citizen”, or anything similar. 2A ensures that you can get and own guns. Privacy not promised.
@LaughingGravely@OmarRiverosays How will a legal conviction for undermining democracy (or whatever fits exactly, in legal terms) prove that they were correct? Is it Opposite Day in your town?
@MBrace777@OmarRiverosays Over 90% of the TINY AMOUNT of fraud discovered by ALL INVESTIGATORS (including all Republican-led agencies) was committed by Republican voters for Republican politicians. And it was not enough to change ANY RESULTS in ANY DISTRICT OR STATE. 60 court cases showed NOTHING.
@gschuman@OmarRiverosays The First Amendment DOES NOT PROTECT slander, incitement to violence, incitement to panic, and many other things. Learn what the law is before you claim it’s a violation. Facts don’t care about your feelings, remember?
@RepMTG MTG, you can’t tell the difference between terrorists and citizens. Whether it’s Hamas vs Palestinians, MAGA vs Americans, you don’t see who is a terrorist and who is not.
@joshspahr@laurenboebert His First Amendment rights are not changed at all. It is always illegal to intimidate witnesses, to threaten violence, incite violence, or doxx people. He wasn’t following these laws; she just put him on notice to stop breaking the law, or face consequences.
@laurenboebert Boebert, you are ignorant of the law, and the ruling. Trump can discuss his case. He is only barred from threatening or doxxing ANYONE involved in the case. If whining about being caught at his crimes is his only topic for the campaign, maybe he should not run.