THIS was WORTH REPOSTING …
This Canadian girl just said what millions are thinking but are too afraid to say out loud.
“Can somebody please tell me how we’re still calling Canada a free country?”
Then she laid out the receipts:
- We can’t access certain news channels without the government or platforms getting in the way.
- We can’t even pray in peace without someone trying to shut it down.
- Don’t fill out the census? Get fined.
- Someone breaks into your house? You can’t defend yourself properly — you can’t even hurt them without risking jail.
- We can’t own guns to protect our families.
- The government now decides what your kids can see on social media — not you.
- And we don’t even get to decide what goes into our own bodies… or our babies’.
This isn’t freedom.
This is a managed population.
Year after year, the Liberals chipped away at it — one “reasonable” restriction at a time — until regular Canadians started asking the question this woman is asking.
Mark Carney and the people running this country didn’t inherit a free nation.
They inherited one they could control.
And they’ve been very busy.
If this still feels like “Canada” to you, you’re either not paying attention… or you’re part of the problem.
Watch this.
Share it.
Then ask yourself the same question she did.
#cdnpoli #CarneyResign #LiberalFail #Freedom #ParentalRights #SelfDefense #NannyState
This wasn’t about your health, it was an unquestioned marketing campaign to get people to take this experimental product. Billions of people were just guinea pigs.
Headlines like this, with zero evidence to back them up, were pumped out to the public daily.
We can’t ever forget what they did.
‼️MAJOR BREAKING
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA RULES 9-0
and overrules all lower courts
to confirm that governments cannot place themselves above the law
specifically, that the political oversight over Justin Trudeau's WE Charity scandal does not replace judicial review.
Canadian Law is Clear - the Covid-19 Vaccines were not proven to be safe or effective.
The Allison Inquiry reproduces the law governing the approval of the Covid-19 vaccines.
The relentless messaging during Covid that the vaccines were proven to be safe and effective was political messaging aimed at manipulating the population to be vaccinated. This political messaging is in direct conflict with published Canadian Law.
So either Canadian Law is wrong, or the political messaging that the vaccines were proven to be safe and effective is wrong.
Read my new Substack article here:
https://t.co/lZGKozyvpC
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Canada strikes down Section 66 of the Conflict of Interest Act, allowing Democracy Watch to proceed with its case against the Ethics Commissioner’s clearance of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
for the full story : https://t.co/O2AoBcu9Xu
It's called 'Criminal Negligence Causing Injury or Death' - Contrary to the Criminal Code of Canada.
Authorities knew - THEY KNEW - that the so-called COVID vaccines killed and injured babies in the womb and newborns.
Yet... they still told pregnant women "Safe and Effective"
In 2021-2022 @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus suspected a problem and investigated unexplained infant deaths that were TRIPLE the normal rate.
You need to know how and why the authorities shut down her investigation and charged Grus to deter other police officers from making the same inquiries.
https://t.co/oe5kmNtiPI
🚨 THE COVID COVER-UP IS BEING CHALLENGED FROM INSIDE PARLIAMENT
The silence is beginning to break.
In this explosive interview, I speak with serving Canadian MP Dean Allison and constitutional lawyer Shawn Buckley about their campaign to expose what they describe as one of the greatest public health scandals in modern history.
We discuss censorship, vaccine injury, the media, accountability, Canada's MAID programme and why they believe thousands of victims deserve to have their voices finally heard.
If they're right, the implications reach far beyond Canada.
This is an interview you cannot afford to miss.
🎥👇@DeanAllisonMP@shawnbuckleylaw@AllisonInquiry
While you wait for Fauci’s hearing to start, a reminder that when the U.S. government purchased Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, it contractually agreed to keep the PREP Act immunity in place for as long as their vaccines are administered in the United States.
What that means is that the U.S. government promised Pfizer and Moderna that it could not be sued for harms from its Covid-19 vaccines, irrespective of whether an emergency continued to exist.
But not only did our government contractually agree that Pfizer and Moderna can harm and kill Americans with impunity, it also guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars for this privilege.
Even worse, the U.S. government guaranteed this immunity in July 2020, months before it first authorized Covid-19 vaccines in December 2020. Meaning, the U.S. government pre-guaranteed these companies immunity from any harm caused by their products, thus, knowingly undermining any incentive for them to create a safe product.
And how much were Pfizer and Moderna guaranteed to be paid by the U.S. government to develop a product that could harm its own citizens with impunity? A total of over $21 billion just in the initial rollout -- $8.63 billion for Moderna and $13.15 billion for Pfizer.
Sound unreal? See the actual contracts for yourself linked in my most recent restack.
The Fallout
The implications are incredible.
To start, Pfizer and Moderna could sue the U.S. government for breach of contract and potentially other relief if PREP Act immunity is terminated before the United States’ use of their COVID-19 vaccines ceases.
Only in an upside-down world would the U.S. government siphon over $21 billion of its citizen’s taxpayer dollars to Pfizer and Moderna and pre-guarantee a profit-motivated company sweeping immunity for harms its product causes to its own citizens.
Summing it up:
The U.S. government guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna immunity for injuries from their products before they were even developed, thereby eliminating the incentive for these companies to make their product safe. Worse, it gave these companies billions of dollars of its citizens’ money to develop these products, and even more incredible, it then spent billions more of its citizen’s money to promote Pfizer’s product as “safe and effective.” And in an ultimate slap to its citizens, then it required them to be injected with this product under the threat of grave consequences, including expulsion from school, losing their job, discharge from the military, etc.
Who is Being Protected?
Who exactly is the U.S. government working for? Whose interests is it protecting?
Government agencies have a well-documented history of being captured by industry. It is known in political science as regulatory capture. In this case, the capture is by pharma and the degree of capture is unprecedented.
You, the collective citizens of the United States, have paid Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars. You have paid with your taxes. You have paid with your bodies when you were injured without recourse against Pfizer or Moderna. You have paid with your right to freedom when you were forced to be injected with their products under penalty of losing basic civil rights, employment, or more.
And what have Pfizer and Moderna paid? Nothing. They instead raked in billions of dollars of your money as long as they developed a Covid-19 vaccine and were shielded from liability irrespective of how unsafe of a product they developed or how much harm it would cause the public that paid them.
The Solution
The above again brings into focus why no medical product should ever be mandated. This assures you can say “no” if you don’t want a product developed with pre-guaranteed immunity for harms. “No” where its clinical trial had more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. “No” where it generates over $55 billion in revenue but its morally-bankrupt manufacturers won’t spend a dollar to compensate those injured.
Even if you support all current vaccines, masks, etc., there may come a day when you may not want to take a mandated medical product or procedure. When that day comes, it may be too late to recapture the rights you have surrendered. Rights lost are rarely retrieved. This is why, while everyone should be free to take any medical product, everyone should also be free to decline any medical product without penalty.
It should be that simple.
Take Action
To that end, I encourage you to send the following proposed legislation to your legislative representatives:
“No law may require or coerce a person to receive or use a medical product, or impose a penalty or deprive a benefit for refusing a medical product or refusing to disclose whether a person has received a medical product.”
Medical freedom is freedom. If you cannot get a job, go to school, play sports, sit in a restaurant, or otherwise participate in civil society because you refuse a medical product, then what good are your rights if you can exercise them only at home by yourself? That is why medical freedom is a fundamental right that must be permanently fixed into the law of every civilized nation.
Thank you to all the warriors, veteran and new, who join arms in the battle to secure this fundamental right. As aptly stated in the Declaration of Independence, we “are endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and to safeguard those rights “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” We must never yield to the tyranny of permitting others to dictate what can or must be placed, administered, or injected onto or into our bodies. For once that right is ceded, none truly remains.
I’m an average Canadian.
For 11 years under this Liberal government my standard of living has fallen.
Not in a spreadsheet. In real life.
My dollars buy less every month.
Housing is a fantasy for my kids.
Groceries hurt.
Food banks are full of working people.
Good full-time jobs feel harder to find.
The dollar keeps sliding.
Investment has fled by a trillion dollars.
Companies are saying they can’t expand or even stay.
They call it “strong.”
They call it “resilient.”
They announce another committee, another photo-op, another trip to Europe.
Meanwhile they shut down scrutiny, hide the details of deals, and keep spending money we don’t have.
They have a majority. They can do whatever they want. And what they choose is more of the same — more regulations that choke the energy sector that actually pays the bills, more opacity, more gaslighting, and zero admission that their own policies are the problem.
Canada sits on some of the richest resources on earth. We should be thriving. Instead we are being governed by people who seem determined to dismantle what used to work while refusing to tell us their real agenda.
We are not “strong.”
We are stagnating.
Many of us are already in a personal recession.
And the cliff edge is getting closer.
How long before we fall?
As long as this government refuses to reverse course, admit failure, or put working Canadians ahead of their ideology and their overseas speeches, the answer is: not long enough.
They will never fix what they will not even acknowledge is broken.
And right now they are ramping up, not backing down.
I’m seriously worried about the viability of this country.
Not because Canada lacks potential.
But because the people running it no longer seem to care about the people living in it.
Enough.
#CanadaDeservesBetter
Beyond terrible. The Government is forcing the Amish Community…the healthiest unvaccinated control group left on Earth…to take ‘vaccines’ because nothing threatens the narrative like living proof that you don’t need them…
Simply put, create a fear, narrative, create the “other“ for the people being propagandized interfere to focus the frustration on, in this case being the “anti-vaxxers”, reinforce the scenario with a get out of jail free card called the “vaccine“, and then continue the fear narrative maintaining the need for the persecution of the “other“ in the meantime.
Same process the Nazis used in 1930s Germany, create a problem, single out people that allow the problem to continue, use that chaos to impose authoritarian dictates.
My cardiologist didn't prescribe a statin because he thought it would save my life.
He prescribed it because he had to.
His quality score depended on it. His reimbursement was tied to it. His insurance contracts required it. If my LDL was above the threshold and he didn't write the prescription, his performance metrics went red.
Not mine. His.
I spent three years wondering why every doctor I saw reached for the same drug. Then I looked at the system behind the prescription. What I found made everything make sense.
Your doctor is not free. 🧵
@DonaldBestCA@OttawaPolice Same for all levels of Gov in every Province & Territory. Crim neg causing death is considered culpable homicide in the criminal code. Intimidation too.
The proper term for what Pfizer did is 'Criminal Negligence Causing Death' - Contrary to the Criminal Code of Canada.
That's exactly what @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus was investigating concerning a cluster of unexplained infant deaths that was three times the normal rate.
Discover more at: https://t.co/oe5kmNtiPI
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) has this advice on their website regarding MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying):
"When completing a medical certificate of death for a person to whom MAID has been administered:
- The illness, disease or disability leading to the request for MAID is to be recorded as the cause of death.
- The certificate cannot include any reference to MAID or the medications administered."
They are literally instructing doctors to omit MAID from death certificates.
The cover-up continues.
Let’s be real:
All charges were dropped, because if this had gone to court the world would’ve seen how a great doctor was forced into fraudulent activity in order to actually help people. By giving saline, rather than dangerous Covid vaccines, he saved many lives. That would’ve been bad press if nationalized...
God bless
Spraying glyphosate over Ontario’s boreal forest to kill fire-resistant deciduous trees (aspen, birch, fireweed) and create flammable conifer monocultures was always risky.
Timeline: Glyphosate commercialized 1974, Canadian ag use 1976, forestry adoption ramped up late 1970s–1980s with widespread aerial spraying. Ontario continues spraying tens of thousands of hectares yearly; Quebec banned it on Crown land in 2001.
Wildfires have always been part of the boreal, but data shows increasing trends in area burned and large fire sizes since the 1980s onward, accelerating with climate-driven fire weather. Northern Ontario’s current blazes (100+ active, evacuations) are sending smoke over cottage country.
These conifer monocultures look orderly but are an ecological disaster waiting to happen. Conifers are vulnerable to pests, less hospitable to wildlife, and more flammable. Glyphosate kills moisture-retaining native plants, leaving drier landscapes that are practically begging for a spark. Studies near Thunder Bay show moose populations dropping from lost food sources. Traces contaminate berries and medicinal plants used by First Nations.
Spraying to “protect” timber yields turns forests into tinderboxes. IARC classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.” Aerosol drift from aerial apps raises inhalation and downwind exposure risks.
Fires are natural + climate-amplified, but management choices (monocultures over diverse, resilient mosaics) matter. Time to rethink before more smoky summers.
What say you, Ontario?