@lauprobablyidk He kinda would do that if their fountain kept flowing. They're delicate flowers in glass cases that need a lot of care. And such care cannot be done from within the dark world. So yea...
@SullivanBarsan1@zachary_isaacz If you complete the secret fight and take all of the gear you can you'll get the option to buy the scarf for one flowery dollar
@AnotherJooby Literally my favourite art for Silksong that Ari made. I'm so glad we got it during the time when Silksong wasn't out (and wouldn't be for a long time). Kept my hopes up. It's still set up as my browser's theme for how awesome it is
We definitely need to continue to make noise and vent our frustration about this.
Sega’s been using GenAI as a support tool for a few years now, even before this Crazy Taxi sitch, and I’m worried it’ll reach a point that they won’t care about what the fans think anymore.
PSA TO GAME DEVELOPERS/PUBLISHERS: I will not buy your game if you used genAI at any point during production, and neither will anyone who likes and RTs this post.
Hope this helps! ❤️
Okay but like you know WHY there's "pushback" right?
Have you not heard abt the people who don't have clean drinking water near data centers?
Plagiarism is one issue, but putting human rights on the back burner to "generate a concept" instead of jus using your brain is severe ⬇️
I'm really not ok with creative work being replaced by AI.
Anyone who thinks it's ok cuz it's "just background assets" will be cool when it's more than that, too. You watch. They're literally relying on that spinelessness to get the gaming community used to accepting Gen AI.
Can we stop with this "at least it's not-" shit. The environment is still damaged, the water is still polluted, the price of energy still goes up, and the artistic process is still tainted. I don't and YOU shouldn't gaf how much or little it was used, damage is done regardless.
Yeah, no. There is no valid reason to use AI even for this usage. Reference materials exist, artists are paid to develop their ideas, you don’t need to run an idea through genAI to then draw it anyways.
I’d rather things I pay for be crafted by humans from start to finish.
Why would I care about the ideas in your game if you didn't actually care enough to conceptualize them yourselves?
Do you actually think so little of the art you're creating that you think this is elevating it in any way?
The goal for companies eventually is to hide that they use AI in the future so they launch and make their money. Then when it’s inevitably found out it’s too late for a boycott to do any damage.
It’s why it’s important to keep talking about this.
This is still beyond unacceptable stop using generative ai for anything you've literally been better off for longer without it than with it
@SEGA@SEGA_OFFICIAL
“It’s only being used for coding and stuff”
I don’t care Coders are getting put out of jobs for AI replacement, you shouldn’t value them less cause they aren’t on the creative art side of development
Gen AI is inexcusable no matter where its used. It hurts the environment & is anti art. Do not give anyone slack cuz "well at least they didnt use it that much" we should not be ok with anyone using it AT ALL. Make art with your own hands, dont give part of the art process to ai.