Den

Just a girl having fun
🇲🇽
header by @valkyraelovebot
// back-up

[Una mujer cualquiera @CualquieraMujer]

Argentinos: "La afición mexicana es la peor que existe".

La afición mexicana:

[Mena @mena_ishere]

It’s not Egypt vs Argentina. It’s The People vs Argentina tonight.

[Quackity @Quackity]

Mexico vs England by far one of the greatest games of this World Cup

[𝐟𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐯 @heis_fede]

The football rules apply to everybody except you play for Argentina.

Not even a foul was called for this 😂😂😂

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

@TeamYouTube I’m respectfully requesting a manual review of my channel, ScalingStories.

After being flagged for “Inauthentic Content” on January 27, 2026, I spent three months reviewing the guidelines, deleted more than 1,000 older videos, rebuilt my channel, and reapplied with only new content. I was still denied for the same reason.

Every current video is voiced and manually edited by me, uses gameplay I record myself, and includes my original reactions, opinions, commentary, and custom avatars. My personal contribution is an integral part of every video.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

[Den @confi3312]

@riotgames @RiotSupport how come I played Sunset, and it is supposed to be off the pool map? This is comp, and it's one of my placement games, but what the heck? I could´ve lost RR because the map is barely playable, we couldn't see the mini map, we couldn't see pings

[Den @confi3312]

@riotgames @RiotSupport what the heck, isn't sunset supposed to be off the pool map? the mini map is messed up, everything is messed up and I still gonna lose RR?

[Den @confi3312]

Protejamos los bosques argentinos - ¡Firma la petición! https://t.co/40cqQgBhzo via @Change_Mex

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

I even asked YouTube’s own Studio AI what “inauthentic content” means, if I am doing it, and how to avoid it, and the most confusing part is that the guidance it gave me describes the things I am already doing on my channel.

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT

For “Originality and Transformation,” it said that content that is mass-produced or uses templates with little variation can be flagged, and that storytelling channels should add significant value through unique commentary, distinct narrative structures, or creative visual elements that go beyond simply reading or displaying existing text.

That is exactly why I do not understand this decision. My videos are not simple readings of existing text. Throughout the stories, I pause to add my own reactions, opinions, context, and commentary. I talk through the decisions being made, the emotional dynamics involved, and what viewers can take away from the situation. The value is not limited to a short summary at the end because my perspective is woven throughout the entire video.

My audience engages with that perspective directly. In the comments, viewers respond to the points I make, challenge my takes, agree with certain opinions, joke about my reactions, and continue the discussion around the commentary I added. That engagement shows they are not only consuming the story itself. They are responding to my voice, my judgment, and my personal contribution to the content.

I also use my own voice in every video, record my own gameplay/background footage, manually edit the videos myself, and use several custom avatars to represent myself while I am speaking to my viewers. Those avatars help add personality, emotion, and creative visual expression to the videos. This is a manual, personal, transformative process, not automated or mass-produced content.

For “Repetitious Content,” Studio AI said this refers to channels where the content is so similar that it is difficult to distinguish one video from another. It also said having a consistent theme or brand is fine, but the core substance of each video, including the story, analysis, and presentation, must be distinct.

Again, that does not describe my channel. Yes, my channel has a consistent theme: storytelling, commentary, and gameplay progression. But the core substance of each video is different. Each video is unique and different from the others because I am reading multiple different stories, and the topics of those stories vary widely from upload to upload.

The subject matter changes heavily from video to video. Some videos focus on broken friendships or family conflict, while others deal with serious relationship situations, housing disputes, workplace problems, or completely different personal dilemmas. The format may be recognizable, but the actual stories, themes, discussions, commentary, and takeaways are not interchangeable.

For “Spam and Deceptive Practices,” I am not doing what is described. I am not misleading viewers, manipulating engagement, mass-uploading low-effort content, or using deceptive practices.

For “AI and Synthetic Content,” I am also not doing what is described. My videos are voiced by me, edited by me, and built around my own commentary, reactions, gameplay, custom avatars, and personal expression. This is not AI-generated, synthetic, or automated content pretending to be something else.

So I am asking again for a fair manual review from a real person. YouTube’s own Studio AI gave me guidance for avoiding inauthentic content, and my channel already follows that guidance. If my content is still being labeled “inauthentic,” I desperately need a real human reviewer to explain what specifically violates the policy, because the examples and guidance I have been given do not match my content.

Please help me get a real manual review of ScalingStories.

Channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM
Public "Appeal" Video/Behind The Scenes (I have one unlisted that YouTube can view that has my face showing w/ webcam): https://t.co/1gX2fub8bK

#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview #fixyoutube

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”

My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.

The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”

I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”

I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.

To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.

My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM

[Mohamad Safa @mhdksafa]

Imagine if Iran bombed Washington and killed students in schools, what would you call it? Terrorists

The U.S. and Israel bombed Tehran and killed students in schools. Why do you call it a "pre-emptive strike"?

Bombing a school is a war crime under international humanitarian law

[Den @confi3312]

@MabelGaldamez12 @ponchohd Ya sientes señora

[z. @hrlequins]

I am never shutting up about this. not only because of the fact that she showed up to support benito but also because she literally rearranged the song and turned it into a salsa, it shows that she truly wanted to show her appreciation for our culture

[pop culture gal @allurequinn]

the fact that he only invited ONE non-latin person and it’s literally the biggest LGBTQ+ icon… he really did everything right with this performance

[Shakira @shakira]

Water bending! 💦 Tláloc y yo nos pusimos de acuerdo para que lloviera en el momento exacto!

[Horcus @Horcus]

Si esto te llega, gracias por confiar en mi, Jett

If this reaches you, thanks for trusting me, Jett

#VALORANT ❤️

[Den @confi3312]

@wenisprinkles Stay safe glitter, you are a strong badass woman

[Den @confi3312]

@CORPSE It's almost like my name 🥰

[CTWT PROJECTS @CHCBirthProject]

🚨ATTENTION🚨

We have 15 DAYS until corpse's birthday (August 8th) so we also have 15 DAYS to raise as much as we can for the FIBRROMYALGIA CARE SOCIETY OF AMERICA as a present for corpse!

RTs are very much appreciated!

https://t.co/7dqeBYbj2B