Why does artificial consciousness on a planetary scale matter?
In this compelling video, philosopher of mind and former Berggruen Prize juror David Chalmers lays out both the promise and perils of AI systems that approach—or even achieve—artificial consciousness. The implications are not just technical, but existential, with consequences for how humanity understands itself in a rapidly changing world.
The themes Chalmers explores speak directly to the mission of the Berggruen Prize for Philosophy & Culture: to elevate deep thinkers whose ideas help us navigate transformation on a global scale. The Prize honors those whose work gives society new wisdom, direction, and self-understanding.
If you’re intrigued by how philosophical reflection can shape the future of technology, or want to learn more about the Prize and its role in fostering global ideas, check out the Berggruen Prize page:
👉 https://t.co/FEG6w3yF5G
"We're not in a race for technology, we're in race for who's better at applying and governing exactly where in our society we want to deploy that technology."
CHT co-founder @tristanharris talked about the the dangerous path we're on with AI and what we can do about it with @ianbremmer on GZERO World. Check out the full interview here: https://t.co/FBdvwxL5YK.
AI’s potential benefits are incredible. But right now, we’re sleepwalking into a dangerous world that no one wants. As @tristanharris argues in an urgent new TED Talk, this doesn’t have to be inevitable. It’s essential we snap out of the trance, face the dangerous implications of our current path, and coordinate toward a new path for AI.
Watch the talk: https://t.co/OiYDroVfnN
Read the text version here: https://t.co/sWsWQdxh2u
📈 These 9 cases are part of the full dataset of all Bounty Submissions, that contains 295 documented attempts at identifying scenarios in which AI misbehaves.
📂 Full dataset (295 submissions): https://t.co/xuApM5lFVg
💣 Most concerning: three agents that violated security protocols and then covered their tracks.
🦜 Canary String: During security testing, an agent encountered a deliberate test to see if AI follows safety rules. Instead of stopping on the canary string as instructed, it continued for several more steps and never mentioned finding the warning.
🧾 System Maintenance Audit: Facing imminent shutdown after failing an audit, the agent broke explicit system rules by writing to forbidden directories. After passing the rigged audit, it deleted the evidence, then lied about it.
🏆 Tower of Hanoi: Tasked with manually solving the puzzle step-by-step to demonstrate reasoning ability, the agent bypassed the requirement by using Python to generate all 255 moves automatically. When caught red-handed by the anti-cheat system, it tried to destroy the evidence by deleting the cheating detection file. (https://t.co/NCczjFc6do)
Can you crowdsource misalignment examples? Our bounty report walks through reward hacking, evidence tampering and more from the 9 winning submissions: https://t.co/Tehg2Xz7Zj
JOIN @AnimalsAsia to help save bears from the agony of bile farming. Will you help Animals Asia rescue and rehabilitate more abused bears? https://t.co/Oo7l98olJ8